F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Comparing CPUs and HandBrake highlights their distinct roles in computing tasks.

Comparing CPUs and HandBrake highlights their distinct roles in computing tasks.

Comparing CPUs and HandBrake highlights their distinct roles in computing tasks.

1
12conker26
Member
59
08-25-2023, 10:48 PM
#1
I've never found a resource comparing handbrake encoding times across different CPUs with detailed video file info. Sources like Anandtech seem to rely on preset settings that mainly focus on FPS rather than actual performance data. You might want to look for benchmarks that track encoding speed per core or per thread, and ideally include the input file size and output format. If you'd like, I can help you design a testing plan to gather this information yourself.
1
12conker26
08-25-2023, 10:48 PM #1

I've never found a resource comparing handbrake encoding times across different CPUs with detailed video file info. Sources like Anandtech seem to rely on preset settings that mainly focus on FPS rather than actual performance data. You might want to look for benchmarks that track encoding speed per core or per thread, and ideally include the input file size and output format. If you'd like, I can help you design a testing plan to gather this information yourself.

H
HorseyHay
Member
208
08-27-2023, 03:51 PM
#2
Boosting FPS means improving the game's frame rate. You require specific detail levels in your data for accurate comparisons. Handbrake tests usually offer thorough and reliable information to guide buying choices.
H
HorseyHay
08-27-2023, 03:51 PM #2

Boosting FPS means improving the game's frame rate. You require specific detail levels in your data for accurate comparisons. Handbrake tests usually offer thorough and reliable information to guide buying choices.

T
TheFreshestAC
Member
182
08-28-2023, 01:27 AM
#3
Encoding performance depends heavily on chosen settings and file complexity. The process differs from simply compressing a video captured on an iPhone or DSLR versus a Bluray. Using a standard x265 preset works well if frame rate matches the source for accuracy. I’m unsure how much newer CPUs outperform my 7700, though I saw a review mentioning over 100 FPS on a 10700k recently. It seems either advanced CPUs use special tech or the test was too simple. The review method lacks consistent results across different processors.
T
TheFreshestAC
08-28-2023, 01:27 AM #3

Encoding performance depends heavily on chosen settings and file complexity. The process differs from simply compressing a video captured on an iPhone or DSLR versus a Bluray. Using a standard x265 preset works well if frame rate matches the source for accuracy. I’m unsure how much newer CPUs outperform my 7700, though I saw a review mentioning over 100 FPS on a 10700k recently. It seems either advanced CPUs use special tech or the test was too simple. The review method lacks consistent results across different processors.

S
supercoose145
Member
59
09-03-2023, 06:30 AM
#4
Gather the data and execute it – this will help you contrast performance between CPUs with 1080p and 4K resolution. You can also visit HWbot to compare your tested chip against others. Have fun! HWBOT X265 Benchmark – Hardware Museum
S
supercoose145
09-03-2023, 06:30 AM #4

Gather the data and execute it – this will help you contrast performance between CPUs with 1080p and 4K resolution. You can also visit HWbot to compare your tested chip against others. Have fun! HWBOT X265 Benchmark – Hardware Museum

M
MikkeJakke
Junior Member
35
09-03-2023, 06:50 AM
#5
The benchmarking approach often varies from the original source speed. Methodology details are typically found in reviews. Excerpts are usually shared for consistency, ensuring tests follow the same process. Outcomes from different configurations rarely align on charts, as they would undermine the benchmark's purpose. The 10700k offers double the cores and faster performance compared to the 7700. For benchmarks that benefit from more cores, like Cinebench, it outperforms the 7700 by over twice as much. https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/compare_cp...re_i7_7700 Anandtech's handbrake data supports comparable findings. The 10700k delivers double the frames per second versus the 6700k, matching the 7700 closely. https://www.anandtech.com/show/15785/the...go-again/9 The 7700 marked a lull in Intel's flagship releases and was the final high-end quad-core i7 before upgrades to 16 cores with a blend of performance and efficiency cores in the 13700k.
M
MikkeJakke
09-03-2023, 06:50 AM #5

The benchmarking approach often varies from the original source speed. Methodology details are typically found in reviews. Excerpts are usually shared for consistency, ensuring tests follow the same process. Outcomes from different configurations rarely align on charts, as they would undermine the benchmark's purpose. The 10700k offers double the cores and faster performance compared to the 7700. For benchmarks that benefit from more cores, like Cinebench, it outperforms the 7700 by over twice as much. https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/compare_cp...re_i7_7700 Anandtech's handbrake data supports comparable findings. The 10700k delivers double the frames per second versus the 6700k, matching the 7700 closely. https://www.anandtech.com/show/15785/the...go-again/9 The 7700 marked a lull in Intel's flagship releases and was the final high-end quad-core i7 before upgrades to 16 cores with a blend of performance and efficiency cores in the 13700k.

D
DECOoconnor296
Junior Member
39
09-03-2023, 09:30 AM
#6
Thank you!
D
DECOoconnor296
09-03-2023, 09:30 AM #6

Thank you!