F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Compare the Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 3 3300X to see which offers better performance for your needs.

Compare the Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 3 3300X to see which offers better performance for your needs.

Compare the Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 3 3300X to see which offers better performance for your needs.

W
Way2Meke
Member
235
04-21-2019, 04:52 AM
#1
Hey, consider the Ryzen 5 3500 with its six cores and six threads versus the Ryzen 3 3300X which offers four cores and eight threads. Right now, the R5 3500 is cheaper by about 1000 rupees in India. Since you're focusing on gaming, the choice depends on how much performance boost you need for that workload.
W
Way2Meke
04-21-2019, 04:52 AM #1

Hey, consider the Ryzen 5 3500 with its six cores and six threads versus the Ryzen 3 3300X which offers four cores and eight threads. Right now, the R5 3500 is cheaper by about 1000 rupees in India. Since you're focusing on gaming, the choice depends on how much performance boost you need for that workload.

X
XxPandaxX_74
Member
179
04-21-2019, 09:02 AM
#2
3500x outperforms 3300X slightly. The benefit is minor, yet it makes sense to choose it since R5 is more affordable at the same time.
X
XxPandaxX_74
04-21-2019, 09:02 AM #2

3500x outperforms 3300X slightly. The benefit is minor, yet it makes sense to choose it since R5 is more affordable at the same time.

R
Raze_FR
Member
200
05-04-2019, 03:44 PM
#3
6 processing units with 6 threads versus 4 processing units with 8 threads, all using the same platform – the more affordable option wins
R
Raze_FR
05-04-2019, 03:44 PM #3

6 processing units with 6 threads versus 4 processing units with 8 threads, all using the same platform – the more affordable option wins

C
chickentrot
Member
70
05-09-2019, 09:23 AM
#4
The C++ layout choice can impact performance, but the difference is usually subtle. For casual gaming, both configurations should work well, though higher-end setups like R5 3500 with 3+3 or R3 3300 with 4+0 may offer slight gains in efficiency.
C
chickentrot
05-09-2019, 09:23 AM #4

The C++ layout choice can impact performance, but the difference is usually subtle. For casual gaming, both configurations should work well, though higher-end setups like R5 3500 with 3+3 or R3 3300 with 4+0 may offer slight gains in efficiency.

M
mezaa_eclipse
Member
67
05-09-2019, 10:40 AM
#5
I would choose the 3300x version.
M
mezaa_eclipse
05-09-2019, 10:40 AM #5

I would choose the 3300x version.

V
VinLark
Member
74
05-11-2019, 02:12 AM
#6
The C++ layout affects performance, but the difference in gaming isn't huge. For casual play, both setups work well, though higher-end chips like the R5 3500 tend to shine better. The R3 3300 with 4+0 ccx usually handles games smoothly, while the R3 3300 with 3+3 offers a bit more flexibility.
V
VinLark
05-11-2019, 02:12 AM #6

The C++ layout affects performance, but the difference in gaming isn't huge. For casual play, both setups work well, though higher-end chips like the R5 3500 tend to shine better. The R3 3300 with 4+0 ccx usually handles games smoothly, while the R3 3300 with 3+3 offers a bit more flexibility.

H
HotMilkTea
Member
204
05-13-2019, 02:30 AM
#7
Having over four cores ensures continuous multi-CCX usage, which remains a good value, and the boost clock stays better than the 3300X.
H
HotMilkTea
05-13-2019, 02:30 AM #7

Having over four cores ensures continuous multi-CCX usage, which remains a good value, and the boost clock stays better than the 3300X.