F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Compare the Intel Core i7 7700K and i7 8700K processors.

Compare the Intel Core i7 7700K and i7 8700K processors.

Compare the Intel Core i7 7700K and i7 8700K processors.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
J
Juliloe02
Junior Member
15
03-27-2017, 08:44 PM
#11
Tell me your budget or country and what you require from the PC, including monitor resolution and refresh rate.
J
Juliloe02
03-27-2017, 08:44 PM #11

Tell me your budget or country and what you require from the PC, including monitor resolution and refresh rate.

B
brian2001nl
Junior Member
41
03-27-2017, 09:36 PM
#12
No funds allocated. Play at 144 Hz, 1080p and 1440p (two screens).
B
brian2001nl
03-27-2017, 09:36 PM #12

No funds allocated. Play at 144 Hz, 1080p and 1440p (two screens).

R
Raidex20
Posting Freak
751
03-30-2017, 11:19 PM
#13
I understand that.
R
Raidex20
03-30-2017, 11:19 PM #13

I understand that.

O
Okeinshield
Senior Member
595
04-08-2017, 11:59 PM
#14
Battlefield 1, Witcher 3, Far Cry 5 and more games available.
O
Okeinshield
04-08-2017, 11:59 PM #14

Battlefield 1, Witcher 3, Far Cry 5 and more games available.

O
onelolo57
Member
62
04-09-2017, 04:08 AM
#15
You're focusing on performance without considering cost. Higher resolutions like 1440p offer better clarity and detail, which might be worth the investment if you need sharper visuals.
O
onelolo57
04-09-2017, 04:08 AM #15

You're focusing on performance without considering cost. Higher resolutions like 1440p offer better clarity and detail, which might be worth the investment if you need sharper visuals.

B
Bosnia25
Junior Member
21
04-09-2017, 04:42 AM
#16
BF1: Notable improvements such as 10% average increase, 20-30% boost in lowest frame rates. Witcher 3: Minimal progress, around 5% average FPS rise, 10-20% drop in minimum FPS. Far Cry 5: Very little improvement.
B
Bosnia25
04-09-2017, 04:42 AM #16

BF1: Notable improvements such as 10% average increase, 20-30% boost in lowest frame rates. Witcher 3: Minimal progress, around 5% average FPS rise, 10-20% drop in minimum FPS. Far Cry 5: Very little improvement.

A
alexFishh
Member
63
04-10-2017, 03:25 PM
#17
I choose 1440p and 1080p since I had a budget when they were first purchased, and upgrading doesn’t seem necessary because they already perform well.
A
alexFishh
04-10-2017, 03:25 PM #17

I choose 1440p and 1080p since I had a budget when they were first purchased, and upgrading doesn’t seem necessary because they already perform well.

P
Patu2010
Junior Member
34
04-14-2017, 07:58 PM
#18
Consider your needs and budget to pick the right CPU.
P
Patu2010
04-14-2017, 07:58 PM #18

Consider your needs and budget to pick the right CPU.

T
Taybaybay
Posting Freak
850
04-15-2017, 01:56 PM
#19
From the many benchmarks and reviews I've encountered, this doesn't seem to hold up. When it comes to value for money, the 8400 and then the i5 8600K clearly offer substantial improvements. Still, in raw performance, the i7 7700K remains ahead of the fully locked Coffee Lake i5s in most scenarios, particularly under heavy multi-threaded tasks and when boosted. That said, at the top end it sits in the 5-10 percent range, which is impressive. My i7 6700K runs a bit slower at stock speeds compared to the i5 8600K, but it edges ahead of the i5 8400. At around 4.7GHz, it slightly surpasses the stock 8600K. When boosted to that level, it edges out the 7700K by roughly a similar margin—perhaps around 10 percent, maybe even a touch more at about 15 percent. I’d argue that a 4c/8t setup performs much better than a 6c/6t in most tests.
T
Taybaybay
04-15-2017, 01:56 PM #19

From the many benchmarks and reviews I've encountered, this doesn't seem to hold up. When it comes to value for money, the 8400 and then the i5 8600K clearly offer substantial improvements. Still, in raw performance, the i7 7700K remains ahead of the fully locked Coffee Lake i5s in most scenarios, particularly under heavy multi-threaded tasks and when boosted. That said, at the top end it sits in the 5-10 percent range, which is impressive. My i7 6700K runs a bit slower at stock speeds compared to the i5 8600K, but it edges ahead of the i5 8400. At around 4.7GHz, it slightly surpasses the stock 8600K. When boosted to that level, it edges out the 7700K by roughly a similar margin—perhaps around 10 percent, maybe even a touch more at about 15 percent. I’d argue that a 4c/8t setup performs much better than a 6c/6t in most tests.

R
RegalRizu
Junior Member
37
04-17-2017, 01:41 AM
#20
When you don’t have a Z170 or Z270 card slot, it’s clear you’re using the 8700k. Even if you do, it’ll remain useful for a long time.
R
RegalRizu
04-17-2017, 01:41 AM #20

When you don’t have a Z170 or Z270 card slot, it’s clear you’re using the 8700k. Even if you do, it’ll remain useful for a long time.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next