F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Compare the I7 5820K and 6950X in the context of music production.

Compare the I7 5820K and 6950X in the context of music production.

Compare the I7 5820K and 6950X in the context of music production.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
Streiyn
Posting Freak
768
10-27-2017, 02:48 PM
#1
Hey there, I've got a bit of a situation with my old PC setup. I bought it about five years ago with an i7-5820k and am thinking about swapping it out for a faster CPU. My motherboard is also quite outdated—MSI X99 SLI PLUS—and I checked their website to see what CPUs they currently support. The link you shared points to the latest supported models, but it doesn’t mention my 5820k at all.

I’m curious about two things:
1. Is it safe to assume that i7-6950x is the newest CPU they list for this board?
2. Should I go from the 5820k to the 6950x? Would it really make a difference? And if not, should I look into a new motherboard with an i7-8700k?

Since I’m mainly using my system for music production and need to handle CPU-intensive VSTs, I want to make sure I’m making the right choice. Thanks in advance for your help!
S
Streiyn
10-27-2017, 02:48 PM #1

Hey there, I've got a bit of a situation with my old PC setup. I bought it about five years ago with an i7-5820k and am thinking about swapping it out for a faster CPU. My motherboard is also quite outdated—MSI X99 SLI PLUS—and I checked their website to see what CPUs they currently support. The link you shared points to the latest supported models, but it doesn’t mention my 5820k at all.

I’m curious about two things:
1. Is it safe to assume that i7-6950x is the newest CPU they list for this board?
2. Should I go from the 5820k to the 6950x? Would it really make a difference? And if not, should I look into a new motherboard with an i7-8700k?

Since I’m mainly using my system for music production and need to handle CPU-intensive VSTs, I want to make sure I’m making the right choice. Thanks in advance for your help!

S
Sven_Weetj
Member
220
10-29-2017, 06:20 AM
#2
You should definitely avoid Intel and those outdated X99 CPUs from five years back. Opt for a Ryzen 7 3700X paired with a B550 motherboard. It offers better performance than the 6950X and 8700K while being more affordable. Plus, it will run cooler and consume less power.
S
Sven_Weetj
10-29-2017, 06:20 AM #2

You should definitely avoid Intel and those outdated X99 CPUs from five years back. Opt for a Ryzen 7 3700X paired with a B550 motherboard. It offers better performance than the 6950X and 8700K while being more affordable. Plus, it will run cooler and consume less power.

J
jjsoini
Posting Freak
809
11-19-2017, 06:21 AM
#3
I made a mistake with the naming again. Sorry about that. I don’t really know much about music production or how tough it can be, but this is definitely an improvement. Not sure if the 8700k would actually count as an upgrade in certain situations—stick with your current board or wait for Zen 3 and see what it offers before deciding to switch platforms. Edited July 20, 2020 by TofuHaroto
J
jjsoini
11-19-2017, 06:21 AM #3

I made a mistake with the naming again. Sorry about that. I don’t really know much about music production or how tough it can be, but this is definitely an improvement. Not sure if the 8700k would actually count as an upgrade in certain situations—stick with your current board or wait for Zen 3 and see what it offers before deciding to switch platforms. Edited July 20, 2020 by TofuHaroto

J
Josh83089
Junior Member
2
11-20-2017, 01:28 AM
#4
Thanks for the questions. Considering a 5x5 upgrade, would switching to the Ryzen 7 3700X offer noticeable speed improvements over the 8700K? Let me know!
J
Josh83089
11-20-2017, 01:28 AM #4

Thanks for the questions. Considering a 5x5 upgrade, would switching to the Ryzen 7 3700X offer noticeable speed improvements over the 8700K? Let me know!

T
TwiistedFalcon
Junior Member
48
11-20-2017, 03:57 AM
#5
For music production, the choice of software plays a significant role.
T
TwiistedFalcon
11-20-2017, 03:57 AM #5

For music production, the choice of software plays a significant role.

J
jkrmnj
Junior Member
3
12-10-2017, 12:03 AM
#6
You're good to go with Ableton Live 10. Loading multiple CPU-intensive VSTs like Diva can be tricky, but it's manageable. Make sure your system has enough RAM and consider using a DAW with better multitasking support if needed.
J
jkrmnj
12-10-2017, 12:03 AM #6

You're good to go with Ableton Live 10. Loading multiple CPU-intensive VSTs like Diva can be tricky, but it's manageable. Make sure your system has enough RAM and consider using a DAW with better multitasking support if needed.

A
anthonyyy388
Member
184
12-10-2017, 01:38 AM
#7
Broadwell-E performs better on single-core tasks compared to Haswell-E when measured directly. The gap isn’t huge, but it’s noticeable especially with higher-end chips like the 6950X. The Haswells tend to run faster and match the performance. The 6950X is great for applications needing many cores, though I’m still unsure if it’s a solid investment. I secured a good price on mine—still around $500—which is significantly lower than the typical $750–1000+ range. For those who don’t need strong single-core speed, Xeon models are usually more affordable, but higher core versions remain costly. Avoid ES-based chips; they often don’t fit most motherboards. You’ll want a QS or full release chip if you need top performance.
A
anthonyyy388
12-10-2017, 01:38 AM #7

Broadwell-E performs better on single-core tasks compared to Haswell-E when measured directly. The gap isn’t huge, but it’s noticeable especially with higher-end chips like the 6950X. The Haswells tend to run faster and match the performance. The 6950X is great for applications needing many cores, though I’m still unsure if it’s a solid investment. I secured a good price on mine—still around $500—which is significantly lower than the typical $750–1000+ range. For those who don’t need strong single-core speed, Xeon models are usually more affordable, but higher core versions remain costly. Avoid ES-based chips; they often don’t fit most motherboards. You’ll want a QS or full release chip if you need top performance.

R
Redstoner137
Posting Freak
811
12-10-2017, 02:17 AM
#8
Sky Lake-X isn't compatible with this setup. It was designed for the LGA 2066 connector, while the X99 chipset works with the LGA 2011-3 socket.
R
Redstoner137
12-10-2017, 02:17 AM #8

Sky Lake-X isn't compatible with this setup. It was designed for the LGA 2066 connector, while the X99 chipset works with the LGA 2011-3 socket.

X
XephCraft
Junior Member
5
12-10-2017, 02:54 AM
#9
I believe upgrading to an 8-core Ryzen processor makes sense. But the 4th generation chips could arrive soon, so it might be better to hold off.
X
XephCraft
12-10-2017, 02:54 AM #9

I believe upgrading to an 8-core Ryzen processor makes sense. But the 4th generation chips could arrive soon, so it might be better to hold off.

J
JasonStudios
Junior Member
48
12-10-2017, 11:43 AM
#10
Yeah, I made a mistake. Sorry about that!
J
JasonStudios
12-10-2017, 11:43 AM #10

Yeah, I made a mistake. Sorry about that!

Pages (2): 1 2 Next