F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Compare G.Skill F4-4000C15Q-32GTZR and G.Skill F4-3800C14Q-32GTZN models for the 5900X.

Compare G.Skill F4-4000C15Q-32GTZR and G.Skill F4-3800C14Q-32GTZN models for the 5900X.

Compare G.Skill F4-4000C15Q-32GTZR and G.Skill F4-3800C14Q-32GTZN models for the 5900X.

J
jesse_64
Member
108
05-29-2020, 06:13 AM
#1
What do you believe about choosing the best kit for maximum performance with the 5900X? F4-4000C15Q-32GTZR and F4-3800C14Q-32GTZN both offer 32GB storage, but differ in speed and features. Are you sure they share the same Samsung B-Die chip? Your opinion matters!
J
jesse_64
05-29-2020, 06:13 AM #1

What do you believe about choosing the best kit for maximum performance with the 5900X? F4-4000C15Q-32GTZR and F4-3800C14Q-32GTZN both offer 32GB storage, but differ in speed and features. Are you sure they share the same Samsung B-Die chip? Your opinion matters!

P
Patrions_
Member
216
05-29-2020, 07:08 AM
#2
3800C14 appears to be the superior option. Not ideal for users who only use XMP.
P
Patrions_
05-29-2020, 07:08 AM #2

3800C14 appears to be the superior option. Not ideal for users who only use XMP.

O
Olliesimpo
Member
65
06-02-2020, 03:49 AM
#3
DDR4-3800 CL14 resembles Samsung B-Die, while DDR4-4000 CL15 could be Samsung D-Die or Hynix. Using simple calculations, the latency for DDR4-3800 CL14 is about 7.5 nanoseconds, and for DDR4-4000 CL15 it's roughly 7.37 nanoseconds.
O
Olliesimpo
06-02-2020, 03:49 AM #3

DDR4-3800 CL14 resembles Samsung B-Die, while DDR4-4000 CL15 could be Samsung D-Die or Hynix. Using simple calculations, the latency for DDR4-3800 CL14 is about 7.5 nanoseconds, and for DDR4-4000 CL15 it's roughly 7.37 nanoseconds.

F
Frankette44
Posting Freak
809
06-03-2020, 01:40 PM
#4
Not suitable for any other conditions at 1.5V and 4000MHz
F
Frankette44
06-03-2020, 01:40 PM #4

Not suitable for any other conditions at 1.5V and 4000MHz

E
Emperias
Junior Member
16
06-11-2020, 04:14 AM
#5
Agreed, that's a good observation.
E
Emperias
06-11-2020, 04:14 AM #5

Agreed, that's a good observation.

M
Maxh_
Junior Member
44
06-15-2020, 02:50 PM
#6
AMD describes the three clock domains as maintaining a perfect 1:1:1 sync, meaning the DRAM SDR clock matches uclk and fclk—such as in DDR4-3600 where the memory real clock, uclk, and fclk operate at 1800 MHz. The company also increased the fclk upper limit to 2000 MHz with Zen 3, allowing memory clocks up to DDR4-4000 without needing the mclk:fclk 1:2 adjustment. This means DDR4-4000 can achieve performance similar to DDR4-3800 in "Matisse." For AMD Ryzen processors, memory overclocking leverages the mclk and fclk alignment, enabling gains up to DDR4-4000 before hitting the 14 MHz ceiling. Beyond that, using the divider can still boost mclk further. I tested DDR4-4000 and found it works smoothly, delivering performance close to DDR4-3800 but with a tighter 14 MHz limit. The system paired with the 4000 model was chosen to tighten timing for optimal results. The monitor is an ASUS 27-inch 1440p display at 165 Hz.
M
Maxh_
06-15-2020, 02:50 PM #6

AMD describes the three clock domains as maintaining a perfect 1:1:1 sync, meaning the DRAM SDR clock matches uclk and fclk—such as in DDR4-3600 where the memory real clock, uclk, and fclk operate at 1800 MHz. The company also increased the fclk upper limit to 2000 MHz with Zen 3, allowing memory clocks up to DDR4-4000 without needing the mclk:fclk 1:2 adjustment. This means DDR4-4000 can achieve performance similar to DDR4-3800 in "Matisse." For AMD Ryzen processors, memory overclocking leverages the mclk and fclk alignment, enabling gains up to DDR4-4000 before hitting the 14 MHz ceiling. Beyond that, using the divider can still boost mclk further. I tested DDR4-4000 and found it works smoothly, delivering performance close to DDR4-3800 but with a tighter 14 MHz limit. The system paired with the 4000 model was chosen to tighten timing for optimal results. The monitor is an ASUS 27-inch 1440p display at 165 Hz.