Community size of PC players in Infinite Warfare
Community size of PC players in Infinite Warfare
I observed on the Steam Stats page that Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare appears to be struggling on PC. Currently, the highest numbers are around 9,000 players, with a running count near 6,000. These figures aren’t necessarily peak times, but I’ve checked several days ago and haven’t seen the numbers exceed about 15,000. It’s unusual that no one is discussing this issue on forums or in gaming media. The reviews and player feedback are varied, as expected for a CoD launch, yet I haven’t noticed such poor performance rankings so soon. Am I overlooking something?
Audiences showed little interest in Infinite Warfare. Fans preferred Modern Warfare Remastered, while Activision missed the chance to respond.
AngryJoe created a video discussing the foolish choice by Activision to divide the already tiny PC community across Steam and Windows Store.
Perhaps this FPS problem will disappear completely. How often do you replay the same game? It really messed up my experience with SP WWI/WWII shooters. (Yes, even though newer versions feel more current doesn’t alter my opinion.)
I share your view on hashing identical games using varied maps and settings. It’s about enjoying the challenge of random layouts versus fixed ones. I appreciate survival games since unpredictable maps always offer a fresh experience. If COD could generate procedurally different maps each time, it would be fascinating—no one would get comfortable knowing all the spawn points or ammo locations.
I believe Call of Duty faces much unfair criticism for its lack of meaningful changes, whether it's in kill streaks, perks, or movement systems. They keep introducing new elements just to refresh the experience. For instance, the latest campaign added space flight mechanics. There’s also a feature allowing players to hack enemy robots and control them temporarily. Even if some additions seem unexciting, it’s hard to deny they’ve tried to evolve the franchise. On the other hand, Battlefield 1 continues to resonate with fans, making the series feel like a refreshed look rather than a complete overhaul. It seems the only way to innovate might be by shifting the genre itself.
CoD generated huge profits using their proven approach. While some worry about change, the majority sticks with what works. The most significant updates that drew criticism were those the community found unappealing. Efforts to introduce new ideas often fell short, as they didn’t force a major shift in gameplay. Many of these mechanics already exist in other titles. Ultimately, it seems sales and feedback suggest players aren’t eager for more innovation. As someone who plays Battlefield but hasn’t played CoD since Call of Duty 2, it’s reasonable to point out the same issues with Battlefield.
Requesting a change to their 'Core Formula' essentially means asking them to create an entirely new experience. Most gaming franchises remain distinct due to their unique mechanics, which define what makes them special—whether it's Gears of War, Halo, or Civ. While some elements may be altered, the fundamental gameplay stays recognizable. It’s reasonable to point out issues, but doing so requires genuine engagement with the product. If people truly played the game, they’d notice the differences and understand that it’s not just a rehash of the same title each year.