F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Comcast options

Comcast options

Comcast options

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
J
jada2003
Member
67
10-01-2023, 12:18 AM
#11
This relates to how city governments manage telecommunications. Typically, they permit a single cable company and one telco operator in a given area. But they aren’t obligated to do so. You may need local experts on your city council to push for more choices, which is worth the effort. Understanding local governance is important. The current providers usually prefer maintaining their monopoly and may act aggressively against competition—be cautious.
J
jada2003
10-01-2023, 12:18 AM #11

This relates to how city governments manage telecommunications. Typically, they permit a single cable company and one telco operator in a given area. But they aren’t obligated to do so. You may need local experts on your city council to push for more choices, which is worth the effort. Understanding local governance is important. The current providers usually prefer maintaining their monopoly and may act aggressively against competition—be cautious.

N
NinofanTOG
Member
211
10-06-2023, 08:35 AM
#12
The quality of internet services varies greatly depending on your location within the United States.
N
NinofanTOG
10-06-2023, 08:35 AM #12

The quality of internet services varies greatly depending on your location within the United States.

S
Slaythoms
Member
139
10-14-2023, 12:36 AM
#13
It really depends on both your location and your specific address. Could you provide details about what you're looking for? Please share a list of options so we can assist further.
S
Slaythoms
10-14-2023, 12:36 AM #13

It really depends on both your location and your specific address. Could you provide details about what you're looking for? Please share a list of options so we can assist further.

R
renliff
Member
240
10-19-2023, 03:22 PM
#14
They also need businesses to join. We told our neighbors we lacked sufficient interest for them to visit. Despite strong dislike for Comcast in the neighborhood, the exclusive deal they had with my city is now over. This means any company can enter. The challenge lies in the high costs of setting up a citywide network. ISPs decide whether to enter or improve a market based on local wealth. It's straightforward business logic. Those without much income order less service. Consequently, AT&T focuses only on profitable regions. Not every ISP serves all areas—Verizon is absent except for mobile coverage. I believe there are no wired connections available in Michigan. That’s why I remain confident in my earlier comments. It’s not simple; you accept what comes or face the consequences.
R
renliff
10-19-2023, 03:22 PM #14

They also need businesses to join. We told our neighbors we lacked sufficient interest for them to visit. Despite strong dislike for Comcast in the neighborhood, the exclusive deal they had with my city is now over. This means any company can enter. The challenge lies in the high costs of setting up a citywide network. ISPs decide whether to enter or improve a market based on local wealth. It's straightforward business logic. Those without much income order less service. Consequently, AT&T focuses only on profitable regions. Not every ISP serves all areas—Verizon is absent except for mobile coverage. I believe there are no wired connections available in Michigan. That’s why I remain confident in my earlier comments. It’s not simple; you accept what comes or face the consequences.

Z
Zmondy
Senior Member
405
10-22-2023, 02:06 PM
#15
I believe both sides have valid points. Local authorities can fund infrastructure upgrades and help ISPs manage expenses via tax incentives and related fees tied to cable operations. If they decide to use telephone poles, they must compensate the owners—often AT&T or Verizon in the US. The focus on wealthier cities stems from needing to cover the costs of running cables there. The company I worked with previously used Megapath, while our last-mile provider was Verizon, since they held the rights to the access path. This situation has recently gained public notice. Last-mile providers often work with city officials to prevent new entrants. Depending on your budget, you might choose a major carrier like Verizon or AT&T to lay fiber directly, though that can cost over $100,000 depending on distance from available nodes. Companies needing this service usually share the expense through business parks or community partnerships. If only uploading is required, paying for cloud-based solutions monthly could be more economical.
Z
Zmondy
10-22-2023, 02:06 PM #15

I believe both sides have valid points. Local authorities can fund infrastructure upgrades and help ISPs manage expenses via tax incentives and related fees tied to cable operations. If they decide to use telephone poles, they must compensate the owners—often AT&T or Verizon in the US. The focus on wealthier cities stems from needing to cover the costs of running cables there. The company I worked with previously used Megapath, while our last-mile provider was Verizon, since they held the rights to the access path. This situation has recently gained public notice. Last-mile providers often work with city officials to prevent new entrants. Depending on your budget, you might choose a major carrier like Verizon or AT&T to lay fiber directly, though that can cost over $100,000 depending on distance from available nodes. Companies needing this service usually share the expense through business parks or community partnerships. If only uploading is required, paying for cloud-based solutions monthly could be more economical.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2