F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Cinebench low performance on few cores

Cinebench low performance on few cores

Cinebench low performance on few cores

J
josuaa2001
Junior Member
Find
37
09-23-2017, 04:28 AM
#1
It seems your results are lower than expected despite the 3200MHz RAM. This might not be unusual, especially on a B350 board. Checking temperature limits and ensuring proper cooling could help improve performance.
Reply
Reply
J
josuaa2001
09-23-2017, 04:28 AM #1

It seems your results are lower than expected despite the 3200MHz RAM. This might not be unusual, especially on a B350 board. Checking temperature limits and ensuring proper cooling could help improve performance.

Reply
Reply
F
fiona12
Member
Find
139
09-30-2017, 03:20 PM
#2
i used my ram up to 3600 and there were no problems. i think it could go even higher if i pushed it further. ram speed doesn’t really matter much for this test—raising it from 3200 to 3600 adds about 100-150 points, which is a big jump. most people underestimate how important ram speeds are. actually, this is completely irrelevant; what matters most is temperature. the higher the temp limit, the lower the actual clock speed you get. you want consistently low temps for maximum performance.
Reply
Reply
F
fiona12
09-30-2017, 03:20 PM #2

i used my ram up to 3600 and there were no problems. i think it could go even higher if i pushed it further. ram speed doesn’t really matter much for this test—raising it from 3200 to 3600 adds about 100-150 points, which is a big jump. most people underestimate how important ram speeds are. actually, this is completely irrelevant; what matters most is temperature. the higher the temp limit, the lower the actual clock speed you get. you want consistently low temps for maximum performance.

Reply
Reply
S
snoepjez
Member
Find
60
10-01-2017, 07:40 PM
#3
Was alles anderes noch im System läuft, während du die Ausführung durchführest? Es könnte auch ein Problem mit dem VRM auf der B350-Boarding sein. Ich habe gerade ein Problem mit meinem X470-Board bemerkt – bei 3900A ist der VRM normalerweise auf 100A begrenzt, aber in der Praxis liegt er oft bei etwa 95A. Meine Chips benötigen mehr Leistung, aber der VRM kann das nicht liefern.
Reply
Reply
S
snoepjez
10-01-2017, 07:40 PM #3

Was alles anderes noch im System läuft, während du die Ausführung durchführest? Es könnte auch ein Problem mit dem VRM auf der B350-Boarding sein. Ich habe gerade ein Problem mit meinem X470-Board bemerkt – bei 3900A ist der VRM normalerweise auf 100A begrenzt, aber in der Praxis liegt er oft bei etwa 95A. Meine Chips benötigen mehr Leistung, aber der VRM kann das nicht liefern.

Reply
Reply
Y
yzikage
Junior Member
Find
14
10-03-2017, 12:23 AM
#4
I often overlook it because the VRMs on my B350M perform well—no buzzing, around 70°C max (CPU) and draws about 90W, which seems high for a 3600 with negative voltage offset.
Reply
Reply
Y
yzikage
10-03-2017, 12:23 AM #4

I often overlook it because the VRMs on my B350M perform well—no buzzing, around 70°C max (CPU) and draws about 90W, which seems high for a 3600 with negative voltage offset.

Reply
Reply
G
Gorofex
Junior Member
Find
27
10-08-2017, 12:44 PM
#5
I was taken aback by the performance at around 110 watts, especially with the cooling in place. The VRMs and temperatures were stable in the high 60s, so I should have noted the specific board model. It seems like a Strix B350 F Gaming might be the right choice.
Reply
Reply
G
Gorofex
10-08-2017, 12:44 PM #5

I was taken aback by the performance at around 110 watts, especially with the cooling in place. The VRMs and temperatures were stable in the high 60s, so I should have noted the specific board model. It seems like a Strix B350 F Gaming might be the right choice.

Reply
Reply