Choose the correct socket type: AM4, AM5 or LGA1700.
Choose the correct socket type: AM4, AM5 or LGA1700.
It seems the decision hinges on current GPU prices and budget. Likely purchasing the setup later in the month or soon after. I already have an old CPU cooler suitable for AM4 or 5 chips. The most affordable 6800xt I found has many reported issues, so I won’t go for it. I might start with a 5600 to save money, then consider upgrading to a 5900 or 5800X3D later. If I choose the 5800X3D now, I’d probably opt for an AM5 system. To my mind, the 5800X3D remains quite costly. I updated the main post with the latest status as of September 25, 2023. Edited by Deathcorner
The price gap between the Ryzen 7600/7500F and the 5600 is notable. You can purchase the 7600 or 7500F now and later upgrade to newer models like the 7800X3D or 8800X3D. With AM5 support, you're already using DDR5 RAM and PCI-E 5.0 boards, while sticking with DDR4 and PCI-E 4.0 on AM4 remains a limitation.
AM4 will cost less and a solid AM4 processor can handle most games or programs for years, making it a smart choice if budget matters. Another reason to consider AM5 is its LGA design, which eliminates bent pins and adds safety when upgrading later. It also means you can use a used CPU now and upgrade without issues, potentially saving money later.
It's frustrating how things turned out. I haven't felt any disappointment with my setup thus far.
I understand your perspective. You'll notice two concepts in the main post—one for AM4 and another for AM5. The platform cost difference is around 200 euros, which is significant when considering a better GPU. That's why I'm leaning toward the path of upgrading. In the Netherlands, 7500F isn't available, so the price gap between 5600 and 7600x is 115 euros. The 7600 non-x model is 10 euros cheaper than the x version. With that margin, I prefer the superior option. I'll check my budget in a few months before making the purchase. Both choices seem strong. The ability to upgrade when AM5 nears the end of its life adds value. A 200 euro extra might be worth considering.
I recommend opting for the latest available system, irrespective of your display settings. Many assume higher resolutions diminish the importance of CPU selection, yet this perspective mainly appears in theoretical studies where GPU capabilities are constrained. In reality, most players connect to servers and have CPU-rendered enemies, which significantly affects frame rates based on processor performance. For gaming purposes, CPU choice should prioritize the newest platform you can afford to achieve optimal single-threaded performance and sufficient multicore support for your tasks. AM4 is no longer viable; instead, a budget Intel 12th or 13th generation LGA 1700 chip is preferable unless you have specific needs. While Intel’s 12th gen and earlier models overlap with AM4, the LGA 1700 can handle up to the (soon) 14900K compared to AM4’s 5800X3D. The latter remains a respectable CPU, but it doesn’t justify being part of a completely new setup at this stage.
So you would suguest something like this that i can upgrade down the road? https://nl.pcpartpicker.com/list/PtsGqR Picked 12400 as a cheap entry lvl chip
I agree with your concept. Choosing 1700 instead of AM4 could be a smarter move. Since I haven’t purchased the system yet, it lets me consider my needs more carefully. Everyone strives for the top performance, but is that truly achievable?
Intel's 14th generation remains on the same platform, making the 14600K a potential new leader. Intel 14th Gen Meteor Lake details: release info, specifications, GPU options, and more. Beebom might consider the 14900K, but it's still uncertain.