F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Choose between Call of Duty and Battlefield for your gaming experience.

Choose between Call of Duty and Battlefield for your gaming experience.

Choose between Call of Duty and Battlefield for your gaming experience.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3
A
Amicaty
Member
Find
140
10-13-2016, 11:09 PM
#21
Battlefield 1942 offered a solid experience, consistently enjoyable at local gatherings. The use of the nuke missile vehicle alongside unpleasant helicopter players added an extra layer of challenge.
Reply
Reply
A
Amicaty
10-13-2016, 11:09 PM #21

Battlefield 1942 offered a solid experience, consistently enjoyable at local gatherings. The use of the nuke missile vehicle alongside unpleasant helicopter players added an extra layer of challenge.

Reply
Reply
H
Hidekih
Posting Freak
Find
849
10-14-2016, 12:08 AM
#22
Battlefield could have performed better. It shouldn't release every year. In fact, I believe it would be more enjoyable if both series stopped releasing annually. Honestly, I wish Battlefield focused solely on multiplayer with infantry-only gameplay. The experience should be richer and more immersive.
Reply
Reply
H
Hidekih
10-14-2016, 12:08 AM #22

Battlefield could have performed better. It shouldn't release every year. In fact, I believe it would be more enjoyable if both series stopped releasing annually. Honestly, I wish Battlefield focused solely on multiplayer with infantry-only gameplay. The experience should be richer and more immersive.

Reply
Reply
C
catseecoo
Senior Member
Find
662
10-14-2016, 06:18 AM
#23
I believe if both titles examined their rivals and adopted elements from other games, they’d create a stronger final product. They seem to be losing their edge. I appreciate the small touches from various titles—Battlefield offers appealing maps, COD brings engaging gadgets, Arma excels in weapon dynamics, and CS:GO delivers an exceptional TDM mode. If they could collaborate and combine these strengths, it would be a game-changer. Until then...
Reply
Reply
C
catseecoo
10-14-2016, 06:18 AM #23

I believe if both titles examined their rivals and adopted elements from other games, they’d create a stronger final product. They seem to be losing their edge. I appreciate the small touches from various titles—Battlefield offers appealing maps, COD brings engaging gadgets, Arma excels in weapon dynamics, and CS:GO delivers an exceptional TDM mode. If they could collaborate and combine these strengths, it would be a game-changer. Until then...

Reply
Reply
V
Vogel88
Junior Member
Find
3
10-26-2016, 10:48 AM
#24
Battlefield leans more toward a PC title rather than a mobile one. Frostbite was originally developed for PC and later released for consoles.
Reply
Reply
V
Vogel88
10-26-2016, 10:48 AM #24

Battlefield leans more toward a PC title rather than a mobile one. Frostbite was originally developed for PC and later released for consoles.

Reply
Reply
A
AlmightyEag
Posting Freak
Find
785
10-27-2016, 06:41 AM
#25
Really dislike this kind of shooter—it feels too straightforward and reliant on chance. It doesn’t offer much depth or strategy.
Reply
Reply
A
AlmightyEag
10-27-2016, 06:41 AM #25

Really dislike this kind of shooter—it feels too straightforward and reliant on chance. It doesn’t offer much depth or strategy.

Reply
Reply
Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3