F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Choose between a boot or an emulator for your Duel.

Choose between a boot or an emulator for your Duel.

Choose between a boot or an emulator for your Duel.

W
wahleno
Member
243
11-28-2016, 09:13 AM
#1
Hello! You have a powerful setup but face challenges with performance in professional applications. Your goal is to balance gaming and GIS workloads efficiently. Consider exploring options that let you run both OSes simultaneously, such as a dual-boot configuration or partitioning the SSD for each environment. Running GTX drivers alongside Quadro drivers might cause conflicts, so testing one at a time could help. Alternatively, emulating another OS might simplify management but could complicate driver compatibility. Your current setup is solid for gaming, but you’ll need a solution that supports your GIS studies without sacrificing performance. Let me know if you’d like more details!
W
wahleno
11-28-2016, 09:13 AM #1

Hello! You have a powerful setup but face challenges with performance in professional applications. Your goal is to balance gaming and GIS workloads efficiently. Consider exploring options that let you run both OSes simultaneously, such as a dual-boot configuration or partitioning the SSD for each environment. Running GTX drivers alongside Quadro drivers might cause conflicts, so testing one at a time could help. Alternatively, emulating another OS might simplify management but could complicate driver compatibility. Your current setup is solid for gaming, but you’ll need a solution that supports your GIS studies without sacrificing performance. Let me know if you’d like more details!

M
Moritania
Member
56
11-28-2016, 09:51 AM
#2
The issue with Quadro cards lies in their performance limitations, making them more suited for office work than high-performance gaming.
M
Moritania
11-28-2016, 09:51 AM #2

The issue with Quadro cards lies in their performance limitations, making them more suited for office work than high-performance gaming.

P
ProGaben69
Member
117
11-30-2016, 03:33 AM
#3
Not all options work the same, which is why it matters. Purchasing a cheaper quadro card probably won’t match the performance of a 1070.
P
ProGaben69
11-30-2016, 03:33 AM #3

Not all options work the same, which is why it matters. Purchasing a cheaper quadro card probably won’t match the performance of a 1070.

C
chuckaknuckle
Member
126
11-30-2016, 09:32 PM
#4
You could sell the 1070 and use the proceeds to buy a Quadro. It makes sense, I think.
C
chuckaknuckle
11-30-2016, 09:32 PM #4

You could sell the 1070 and use the proceeds to buy a Quadro. It makes sense, I think.

D
Drago776
Member
59
12-06-2016, 01:21 PM
#5
It relies on the individual's task load and the framework they're evaluating. We also lack that information, though it would be useful!
D
Drago776
12-06-2016, 01:21 PM #5

It relies on the individual's task load and the framework they're evaluating. We also lack that information, though it would be useful!

B
BookMix
Member
207
12-07-2016, 03:45 AM
#6
I think I need to improve my explanation. Right now I'm focused on my senior project. I plan to use Arc GIS to chart a large mountain area and analyze the data. However, when I try to render the 3D image, the program often crashes. I suspect the drivers for my 1070 are causing this issue. I don’t want to replace my 1070 since I just bought a monitor with G-Sync and I don’t want to waste money. So far, it seems unlikely that adding a quadro or Radeon Workstation card would work without driver conflicts. Instead, I’m considering setting up a second operating system on an SSD. There I could install the drivers for the workstation card and turn off the 1070 in Device Manager. This way I’d have one OS running with the 1070 active (and the workstation card disabled) and another with the workstation card enabled (but the 1070 off). In short, I want separate operating systems for work and personal use. (Just a note, I already know disabling graphics cards doesn’t actually power them down.) After some research, it looks like the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers good value for a workstation card. Would this approach be feasible? Or am I missing simpler alternatives?
B
BookMix
12-07-2016, 03:45 AM #6

I think I need to improve my explanation. Right now I'm focused on my senior project. I plan to use Arc GIS to chart a large mountain area and analyze the data. However, when I try to render the 3D image, the program often crashes. I suspect the drivers for my 1070 are causing this issue. I don’t want to replace my 1070 since I just bought a monitor with G-Sync and I don’t want to waste money. So far, it seems unlikely that adding a quadro or Radeon Workstation card would work without driver conflicts. Instead, I’m considering setting up a second operating system on an SSD. There I could install the drivers for the workstation card and turn off the 1070 in Device Manager. This way I’d have one OS running with the 1070 active (and the workstation card disabled) and another with the workstation card enabled (but the 1070 off). In short, I want separate operating systems for work and personal use. (Just a note, I already know disabling graphics cards doesn’t actually power them down.) After some research, it looks like the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers good value for a workstation card. Would this approach be feasible? Or am I missing simpler alternatives?

X
xXkappa2Xx
Junior Member
37
12-23-2016, 07:43 AM
#7
You mentioned experiencing problems mainly with RAM and HDD loading, not GPU performance. Could you clarify the file sizes you typically handle?
X
xXkappa2Xx
12-23-2016, 07:43 AM #7

You mentioned experiencing problems mainly with RAM and HDD loading, not GPU performance. Could you clarify the file sizes you typically handle?

K
Kavenoke
Member
242
12-23-2016, 08:47 AM
#8
the arcmap file is quite large at 3,896 KB. with 16 GB of RAM you're doing fine, and usage stays under eight gigabytes. the storage is a 500 GB SSD. it might be a software problem rather than a hardware issue.
K
Kavenoke
12-23-2016, 08:47 AM #8

the arcmap file is quite large at 3,896 KB. with 16 GB of RAM you're doing fine, and usage stays under eight gigabytes. the storage is a 500 GB SSD. it might be a software problem rather than a hardware issue.

X
xSkylerr
Member
177
12-29-2016, 10:49 AM
#9
That's a small file. It seems there may be an issue with how the 3D render functions. This looks like my work PC with insufficient VRAM, especially with an older Quadro. Have you tried using fewer points or segments first to get some output? Reaching out to Esri directly with your hardware details and crash logs could also be helpful—they’ll likely have the best insight. As for the OS setup, a dual boot would probably work best for you.
X
xSkylerr
12-29-2016, 10:49 AM #9

That's a small file. It seems there may be an issue with how the 3D render functions. This looks like my work PC with insufficient VRAM, especially with an older Quadro. Have you tried using fewer points or segments first to get some output? Reaching out to Esri directly with your hardware details and crash logs could also be helpful—they’ll likely have the best insight. As for the OS setup, a dual boot would probably work best for you.