chipset and antenna configuration
chipset and antenna configuration
When selecting a USB WiFi adapter for long-range performance, antenna size and quantity usually matter more than the chipset version. Prioritize better Mbps reception by choosing the right antenna setup. If two devices match in antennas and size but differ in chipset (WiFi5 vs. WiFi6), the difference in performance will be minimal since the physical components remain identical.
Bruh, how many times are you going to ask the SAME question. You've been told to death that there is no clear cut answer
at least 3 more times. As for your USB WiFi device, you can't just give vague features and make any conclusions. This is a really good wifi adapter from MSI: Any USB Wifi that looks like this is 110% garbage: USB Wifi that look like this will be hit or miss, depending on the exact device: But you can't just say "It's WIFI 5" and expect that to mean anything. That's like saying you're buying new pants and "It has 3 pockets!" And expecting someone to be able to tell if that's good or not.
As discussed earlier, the farther a router is from a device, the slower the connection tends to be. WiFi focuses more on reliability than speed, and physical barriers between the router and the device can disrupt the signal. The type of material these barriers are made from matters—such as drywall has less effect than concrete. Devices using 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz may also cause interference, especially if other networks are nearby. While the Wi-Fi chipset quality matters, it's hard to predict which will perform better. Generally, Intel adapters are regarded as top choices, though this might have changed. Ultimately, you should test it yourself to see what works best. If speed is your main priority, consider using an Ethernet cable or exploring alternatives like MOCA.