Checked the calculations for 9700X versus 9800X3D and 7800X3D. Mainly focused on gaming at 3440x1440 and 4K resolution.
Checked the calculations for 9700X versus 9800X3D and 7800X3D. Mainly focused on gaming at 3440x1440 and 4K resolution.
I chose the 9700X first because of the 9800X3D video below. From that clip I realized how effectively it performed despite being close to 1080p standards. I also found it on sale for $275. Recently, I moved from a 13900K to a 14900KF and now to a Ryzen 7 9700X. This upgrade feels justified since I no longer experience random BSOD crashes thanks to Intel's 13th and 14th generation stability improvements and the previous issues. The main specs include a B650E-F Mobo with 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5 6000 CL36 RTX 4090 990 Pro NVMe CPU, and a custom liquid-cooled GPU with two 360mm radiators and a D5 pump. I’m currently playing Assassin’s Creed Shadows on both my QD-OLED 34" and 4K OLED 55", depending on whether I play at my desk or lay down on the bed with the TV. I set graphics to max ultra, using ray tracing and DLSS at quality, with frame rates off. On 4K I average 50-65 fps, and 3440x1440 I average 65-75 fps. I don’t remember my exact 1% low numbers, but if you need them, I’ll check later after adjusting settings. I’ve noticed slight lag or stuttering when playing 4K on the TV—possibly around 1% lows. I’m not sure if this is the same on my 34" monitor, but I plan to get a 5090 soon once things stabilize. I usually don’t play at 1080p, so I wonder if the 9800X3D or even the 7800X3D would really help with fps on 1440p or 4K, or if it would mainly improve low-frame performance? I’m considering selling it for about $200–$250 if I get around $200–$250 from a loss, or $150–$200 for the 7800X3D. What do you think? Thanks ahead for any advice!
From that review, it seems the 4K experience with a 5090 delivers only a tiny FPS boost—just a single digit improvement—especially in CPU-intensive titles. Compared to the 5800x3D, the jump isn’t noticeable. Whether the extra points justify the cost is unclear; after all, your budget matters.
I upgraded from a 7700X to a 7800X3D for $100. I sold my 7700X for $200 and purchased the 7800X3D for $299 at Microcenter. There was a noticeable improvement in both lows and highs, especially since I mostly play MMO games and congested areas feel smoother now. The 9700X to 9800X3D upgrade would provide even more benefits, as you can overclock the 9800X3D. @Hinjima might be interested—he’d love to share his personal experience. I’d have returned the 14900K and kept it instead. It’s a solid CPU, only surpassed by X3D chips. If RMA wasn’t an option, sorry. Just remember, while X3D chips are great, the 9700X remains a strong gaming CPU on its own. If you’re aiming for top performance, stick with it. If you regret not getting the best, go for the 9800X3D. A few hundred more bucks won’t hurt much, especially since you’re already spending a lot on high-end Intel parts.
I haven't even watched that video yet, thanks for sharing. Even though they only released 7700X, it seems close to 9700X. That’s confusing because I just saw another video, but I’m not sure how reliable it is. I think I should trust the HW Unboxed one more, but it looks like a joke or a lighthearted clip from April 1st.
For the 14900KF, good news—Intel fully reimbursed me the chip, allowing me to revert my platform to AMD. The slight performance drops are appealing if the X3D cache helps, and I’m weighing whether to upgrade to 9800X3D or stick with the 7800X3D I already own. While it might feel like a waste of money on components, I’m trying to stay cautious right now. After receiving my refund, I used it entirely for both the 9700X and the motherboard. Normally I’d get an ASUS Hero board, but this time I chose a Strix board instead. I was even thinking about TUF boards, but now I have a premium paperweight—an LGA1700 Z690 Hero board priced at $250, which is overpriced compared to its $500 purchase. It wasn’t the best choice. Appreciate your reply!
In the bigger picture, a $100 extra over the total build cost isn't significant. It's like deciding whether to buy the $3000 Bowers & Wilkins stereo for a $65,000 vehicle. Is $3k that much when you're already close to $70k? I’d really go for 9800X3D. Because I’m impressed by how the 7800X3D performs and I want not just the upgrade of my chip, but also to customize it. That’s what excites me. Your model has a 4090, so I’d definitely get the 9800X3D to ensure that GPU runs smoothly every frame. As mentioned, you save on the motherboard, so focus your investment on the real performance boost.
This video is clearly a joke for April Fool's Day. He's making light of claims about testing CPUs at 4K resolution. While 4K isn't available yet, the X3D is expected to perform better over time, leading to more noticeable differences in future CPU-intensive games.
Taking into account the current market value of a 4090, it turns out it wasn't as significant as thought. I won't hide the truth—wasn't it a big one? Not really. There are some worries about the 9800x3d dying and the 10800x3d being rumored to be 12 cores. I'm still weighing the advantages and disadvantages in my mind, and I almost grabbed a 7800x3d for 300 USD yesterday.
If you want to sell, I’m open to it and will cover the shipping cost right now with a Ryzen 1600… It’s not great, but for the $200 purchase price, I’ll go ahead.