F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Check your hardware or if the OS/drivers are too large.

Check your hardware or if the OS/drivers are too large.

Check your hardware or if the OS/drivers are too large.

S
SwerPent
Junior Member
36
07-22-2016, 06:38 PM
#1
I rely on my primary W10 setup for years now. A few units are Insider builds. The latest version is 21313.1000. Everything else works fine, but RAM performance drops noticeably on this OS—uncertain if it's an Insider issue. The secondary main branch 10 is normal, especially regarding RAM speeds. What could be the reason? I'll include the Aida64 benchmark results for both. Which one is affected more? Also, the cache seems much faster, and my tests consistently show similar outcomes.
S
SwerPent
07-22-2016, 06:38 PM #1

I rely on my primary W10 setup for years now. A few units are Insider builds. The latest version is 21313.1000. Everything else works fine, but RAM performance drops noticeably on this OS—uncertain if it's an Insider issue. The secondary main branch 10 is normal, especially regarding RAM speeds. What could be the reason? I'll include the Aida64 benchmark results for both. Which one is affected more? Also, the cache seems much faster, and my tests consistently show similar outcomes.

M
mumien350
Member
82
07-23-2016, 06:49 PM
#2
CPU microcode is provided via both BIOS and operating system. A newer Intel microcode might be included in the current build affecting performance. Consider power management settings—enable "Ultimate Performance" in Power Options. From an elevated command prompt, execute: powercfg -duplicatescheme e9a42b02-d5df-448d-aa00-03f14749eb61
M
mumien350
07-23-2016, 06:49 PM #2

CPU microcode is provided via both BIOS and operating system. A newer Intel microcode might be included in the current build affecting performance. Consider power management settings—enable "Ultimate Performance" in Power Options. From an elevated command prompt, execute: powercfg -duplicatescheme e9a42b02-d5df-448d-aa00-03f14749eb61

R
rafagp08
Junior Member
20
07-23-2016, 10:57 PM
#3
Applied the duplicate scheme command, then adjusted power settings to "ultimate performance," but the performance remained unsatisfactory after a restart.
R
rafagp08
07-23-2016, 10:57 PM #3

Applied the duplicate scheme command, then adjusted power settings to "ultimate performance," but the performance remained unsatisfactory after a restart.

R
RattenFanger
Member
199
07-24-2016, 03:04 AM
#4
Their site suggests creating a bootable USB that runs WoW64 to launch AIDA64. They don’t provide specific steps, possibly due to licensing concerns. A possible approach is building a WinPE or using a Windows 10 installer USB for command-line access.
R
RattenFanger
07-24-2016, 03:04 AM #4

Their site suggests creating a bootable USB that runs WoW64 to launch AIDA64. They don’t provide specific steps, possibly due to licensing concerns. A possible approach is building a WinPE or using a Windows 10 installer USB for command-line access.

C
Checkers
Junior Member
18
08-12-2016, 10:25 PM
#5
You can transform a Windows 10 ISO into a bootable USB using Rufus. This allows you to compare with previous versions for compatibility checks. Feel free to share your results if you try it.
C
Checkers
08-12-2016, 10:25 PM #5

You can transform a Windows 10 ISO into a bootable USB using Rufus. This allows you to compare with previous versions for compatibility checks. Feel free to share your results if you try it.

M
Marcustheduke
Senior Member
679
08-13-2016, 06:13 PM
#6
I believe the issue lies in the security settings—when "Core Isolation" is turned on, performance suffers. I’d rather prioritize speed than a known security flaw. The problem seems to vary depending on the version: on secondary 10 it can be toggled, but on my main 10 (Insider) the switch doesn’t work as expected and a bug blocks its activation. I suspect a registry entry might be responsible, and the main culprits are Meltdown and Spectre.
M
Marcustheduke
08-13-2016, 06:13 PM #6

I believe the issue lies in the security settings—when "Core Isolation" is turned on, performance suffers. I’d rather prioritize speed than a known security flaw. The problem seems to vary depending on the version: on secondary 10 it can be toggled, but on my main 10 (Insider) the switch doesn’t work as expected and a bug blocks its activation. I suspect a registry entry might be responsible, and the main culprits are Meltdown and Spectre.

C
Click4300
Member
61
08-17-2016, 01:47 PM
#7
This approach aligns with the fact that Spectre countermeasures introduce a minor slowdown.
C
Click4300
08-17-2016, 01:47 PM #7

This approach aligns with the fact that Spectre countermeasures introduce a minor slowdown.

S
SissyClairie
Junior Member
11
08-17-2016, 03:43 PM
#8
Yes, turning off VT-x in the BIOS did improve performance previously.
S
SissyClairie
08-17-2016, 03:43 PM #8

Yes, turning off VT-x in the BIOS did improve performance previously.