F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Check if your system supports 5GHz Wi-Fi over a PCI-E x1 port.

Check if your system supports 5GHz Wi-Fi over a PCI-E x1 port.

Check if your system supports 5GHz Wi-Fi over a PCI-E x1 port.

D
Diego_HC
Junior Member
40
04-24-2016, 03:45 PM
#1
I'm still trying to figure out why this idea never came to mind before. I was considering using a PCI-E slot for USB 3.0 on my older PC, thinking about transfer speeds and bandwidth. That made me think about my Wi-Fi card, which is in a PCI-E x1 slot on the motherboard. It's working, but it's an older v2.0 version, so the maximum speed is around 500MB/s. How could I actually reach the theoretical 867MB/s? Probably I'd need a newer motherboard that supports at least v3.0 to achieve those speeds. So in a way, I'm limited by my hardware. That sounds frustrating, but maybe that's just how things are. If you have any clarification, I appreciate it. Hope this helps, Ed.
D
Diego_HC
04-24-2016, 03:45 PM #1

I'm still trying to figure out why this idea never came to mind before. I was considering using a PCI-E slot for USB 3.0 on my older PC, thinking about transfer speeds and bandwidth. That made me think about my Wi-Fi card, which is in a PCI-E x1 slot on the motherboard. It's working, but it's an older v2.0 version, so the maximum speed is around 500MB/s. How could I actually reach the theoretical 867MB/s? Probably I'd need a newer motherboard that supports at least v3.0 to achieve those speeds. So in a way, I'm limited by my hardware. That sounds frustrating, but maybe that's just how things are. If you have any clarification, I appreciate it. Hope this helps, Ed.

S
Sythe135
Junior Member
32
04-26-2016, 04:34 PM
#2
The performance is constrained by the motherboard's bandwidth, yet expecting a full 5GHz is probably not feasible.
S
Sythe135
04-26-2016, 04:34 PM #2

The performance is constrained by the motherboard's bandwidth, yet expecting a full 5GHz is probably not feasible.

B
BergliaNils
Member
199
05-02-2016, 02:36 PM
#3
Network speeds are expressed in megabits per second. This means it's not 867 megabytes per second, but rather 867 megabits per second, which is roughly 100 megabytes per second (using 8-bit bytes and accounting for some overhead)
B
BergliaNils
05-02-2016, 02:36 PM #3

Network speeds are expressed in megabits per second. This means it's not 867 megabytes per second, but rather 867 megabits per second, which is roughly 100 megabytes per second (using 8-bit bytes and accounting for some overhead)

M
miner3378
Member
248
05-02-2016, 03:45 PM
#4
Network speeds are measured in MegaBITS, not bytes. That means 867Mbps equals approximately 108.375 Megabytes per second. It operates at 8 bits per byte. For context, 1000 Mbps translates to about 125 Megabytes per second. Remember, wireless connections rarely reach these full rates.
M
miner3378
05-02-2016, 03:45 PM #4

Network speeds are measured in MegaBITS, not bytes. That means 867Mbps equals approximately 108.375 Megabytes per second. It operates at 8 bits per byte. For context, 1000 Mbps translates to about 125 Megabytes per second. Remember, wireless connections rarely reach these full rates.

L
livvy66
Member
129
05-02-2016, 04:20 PM
#5
867 megabits per second, not megabytes per second.
L
livvy66
05-02-2016, 04:20 PM #5

867 megabits per second, not megabytes per second.