F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Check if an i7 7700k with 4.6ghz and 1.170 vcore is feasible.

Check if an i7 7700k with 4.6ghz and 1.170 vcore is feasible.

Check if an i7 7700k with 4.6ghz and 1.170 vcore is feasible.

B
Butterfly1416
Senior Member
701
08-11-2017, 06:04 AM
#1
yo guys im facing a little problem while im overcloking my cpu
specs
i7 7700k
Asus prime z270p
Coolermasterbox lite 5
Season 630W
Coolermaster Siedon 240p
Crucail Ballistic 16GBx1 DDR4 2400mhz
Asus GTX 1070 Strix OC 8GB
so my problem is. when im inreassing core voltage my temp goes thru the sky... i followed alot of guide on the net but still dont have a stable overclock..
its like 4.8ghz on 1.200 core voltage whenever my voltage is low my temp is under 70.. now im stable 4.6 at 1.170 core voltage.. so my case why do i get high temp if im raising my core voltage or im doing something wrong.. any help please.. sry for my shit english..
here a pic where's im standing
i just want overlock to 4.8 with a stable system.
http://prntscr.com/hos4w5
B
Butterfly1416
08-11-2017, 06:04 AM #1

yo guys im facing a little problem while im overcloking my cpu
specs
i7 7700k
Asus prime z270p
Coolermasterbox lite 5
Season 630W
Coolermaster Siedon 240p
Crucail Ballistic 16GBx1 DDR4 2400mhz
Asus GTX 1070 Strix OC 8GB
so my problem is. when im inreassing core voltage my temp goes thru the sky... i followed alot of guide on the net but still dont have a stable overclock..
its like 4.8ghz on 1.200 core voltage whenever my voltage is low my temp is under 70.. now im stable 4.6 at 1.170 core voltage.. so my case why do i get high temp if im raising my core voltage or im doing something wrong.. any help please.. sry for my shit english..
here a pic where's im standing
i just want overlock to 4.8 with a stable system.
http://prntscr.com/hos4w5

A
alexagas
Member
210
08-17-2017, 12:38 PM
#2
Your temperature is fine, aim to stay below 80°C around the clock. Switch to HWmonitor for better temperature and voltage tracking.
This graph can illustrate potential results – http://www.overclock.net/t/1621347/kaby-...statistics
1.200v is too low for a stable 4.8; raise the vcore by 0.010v until it settles. Overclocking levels differ between chips, making it a bit of a silicon lottery. Some devices require more voltage than others—it's all about chance.
A
alexagas
08-17-2017, 12:38 PM #2

Your temperature is fine, aim to stay below 80°C around the clock. Switch to HWmonitor for better temperature and voltage tracking.
This graph can illustrate potential results – http://www.overclock.net/t/1621347/kaby-...statistics
1.200v is too low for a stable 4.8; raise the vcore by 0.010v until it settles. Overclocking levels differ between chips, making it a bit of a silicon lottery. Some devices require more voltage than others—it's all about chance.

L
lil_G_savage
Junior Member
6
08-17-2017, 08:32 PM
#3
another trial on intel extreme tuning program for 10 mins
http://prntscr.com/hoshiw
L
lil_G_savage
08-17-2017, 08:32 PM #3

another trial on intel extreme tuning program for 10 mins
http://prntscr.com/hoshiw

L
lukeisawesome8
Junior Member
14
08-18-2017, 02:20 AM
#4
Makentox :
Your temperature is fine, aim to keep it below 80C around the clock. Consider using HWmonitor for better monitoring of temperature, voltage, and usage.
You can refer to this graph as a reference for what you might achieve:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1621347/kaby-...statistics
1.200v is too low for stable 4.8; raise VCORE until it stabilizes. Also, note that overclocking varies between chips—what some call a silicon lottery.
I found the info, but when I changed the core voltage, my temperature spiked a lot. The only solution was to set the Vcore very low and sometimes it caused crashes.
L
lukeisawesome8
08-18-2017, 02:20 AM #4

Makentox :
Your temperature is fine, aim to keep it below 80C around the clock. Consider using HWmonitor for better monitoring of temperature, voltage, and usage.
You can refer to this graph as a reference for what you might achieve:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1621347/kaby-...statistics
1.200v is too low for stable 4.8; raise VCORE until it stabilizes. Also, note that overclocking varies between chips—what some call a silicon lottery.
I found the info, but when I changed the core voltage, my temperature spiked a lot. The only solution was to set the Vcore very low and sometimes it caused crashes.

D
Dire_Storm
Member
65
08-18-2017, 03:13 AM
#5
I don't think so. Which program are you trying to use for stability testing? I suggest OCCT, as it will display your temperatures too; though I prefer RealTemp GT for that.
D
Dire_Storm
08-18-2017, 03:13 AM #5

I don't think so. Which program are you trying to use for stability testing? I suggest OCCT, as it will display your temperatures too; though I prefer RealTemp GT for that.

M
mineuout482
Posting Freak
812
08-18-2017, 05:25 AM
#6
Makentox suggests maintaining your temperature below 80°C continuously. Consider using HWmonitor for better monitoring of temperature, voltage, and usage. The provided graph illustrates potential achievements. You can view the example here: http://www.overclock.net/t/1621347/kaby-...statistics.

1.200v is not ideal for stable 4.8 performance; adjust VCORE until it stabilizes. Overclocking results differ by chip, making it somewhat like a silicon lottery.

Your temperature is acceptable, just ensure it stays at or below 80°C.
M
mineuout482
08-18-2017, 05:25 AM #6

Makentox suggests maintaining your temperature below 80°C continuously. Consider using HWmonitor for better monitoring of temperature, voltage, and usage. The provided graph illustrates potential achievements. You can view the example here: http://www.overclock.net/t/1621347/kaby-...statistics.

1.200v is not ideal for stable 4.8 performance; adjust VCORE until it stabilizes. Overclocking results differ by chip, making it somewhat like a silicon lottery.

Your temperature is acceptable, just ensure it stays at or below 80°C.

J
JdGamingShow
Member
180
08-27-2017, 07:38 PM
#7
Makentox suggests maintaining a temperature below 80°C continuously and recommends using HWmonitor for better monitoring of temperature, voltage, and usage. The provided graph serves as an example of potential results. You can find more details here: http://www.overclock.net/t/1621347/kaby-...statistics.

1.200v is not ideal for stable 4.8 performance; increase VCORE until it stabilizes. Overclocking varies by chip, making it somewhat like a silicon lottery.

If you raise the core voltage too much, your temperature spikes significantly. The best approach seems to be setting the VCore very low, though this can cause crashes and instability.
J
JdGamingShow
08-27-2017, 07:38 PM #7

Makentox suggests maintaining a temperature below 80°C continuously and recommends using HWmonitor for better monitoring of temperature, voltage, and usage. The provided graph serves as an example of potential results. You can find more details here: http://www.overclock.net/t/1621347/kaby-...statistics.

1.200v is not ideal for stable 4.8 performance; increase VCORE until it stabilizes. Overclocking varies by chip, making it somewhat like a silicon lottery.

If you raise the core voltage too much, your temperature spikes significantly. The best approach seems to be setting the VCore very low, though this can cause crashes and instability.

G
gumibearluver
Junior Member
25
08-31-2017, 05:19 AM
#8
it's not crashing right now, i ran a few tests... atm 4.6 with 1.170 vcore. but i just wanted to let you know that i went to bios then set manuel and 1.170 at vcores—that’s the only setting i changed so far. if there are any other options you’d like to know about, just let me know for an asus z270p .tnx.
G
gumibearluver
08-31-2017, 05:19 AM #8

it's not crashing right now, i ran a few tests... atm 4.6 with 1.170 vcore. but i just wanted to let you know that i went to bios then set manuel and 1.170 at vcores—that’s the only setting i changed so far. if there are any other options you’d like to know about, just let me know for an asus z270p .tnx.

B
154
09-01-2017, 09:25 PM
#9
it's not crashing at the moment, i just ran a few tests... atm 4.6 with 1.170 vcore. but i'm just trying to let you know that i went to bios then set manuel and 1.170 at vcores, that's the only setting i changed so far. if there are any other options you'd like to know about, just let me know. for an asus z270p .tnx
Download CPU-Z, run the stress test and take a screenshot of CPU=Z while the test is running.
You did read this right.
B
Bellabell11295
09-01-2017, 09:25 PM #9

it's not crashing at the moment, i just ran a few tests... atm 4.6 with 1.170 vcore. but i'm just trying to let you know that i went to bios then set manuel and 1.170 at vcores, that's the only setting i changed so far. if there are any other options you'd like to know about, just let me know. for an asus z270p .tnx
Download CPU-Z, run the stress test and take a screenshot of CPU=Z while the test is running.
You did read this right.

N
nicjohn2000
Member
149
09-01-2017, 11:25 PM
#10
It's not crashing at the moment, I ran some tests... currently running at 4.6 with 1.170 vcore. I just wanted to let you know that I went to BIOS, set manual and 1.170 at vcores, which is the only setting I changed so far. If there are any other options you recommend for an ASUS Z270P, please let me know. For reference, check out these links:
https://www.extremetech.com/computing/24...erclocking
Here are some useful tools:
http://prntscr.com/hosrzf
http://prntscr.com/hossoz
My mouse became sluggish during the stress test on CPU-Z.
N
nicjohn2000
09-01-2017, 11:25 PM #10

It's not crashing at the moment, I ran some tests... currently running at 4.6 with 1.170 vcore. I just wanted to let you know that I went to BIOS, set manual and 1.170 at vcores, which is the only setting I changed so far. If there are any other options you recommend for an ASUS Z270P, please let me know. For reference, check out these links:
https://www.extremetech.com/computing/24...erclocking
Here are some useful tools:
http://prntscr.com/hosrzf
http://prntscr.com/hossoz
My mouse became sluggish during the stress test on CPU-Z.