F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Check if 1.4375 volts is suitable for Bordwell-e with a 240mm aio.

Check if 1.4375 volts is suitable for Bordwell-e with a 240mm aio.

Check if 1.4375 volts is suitable for Bordwell-e with a 240mm aio.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
T
thibdu87
Member
229
05-17-2016, 11:02 PM
#11
Have you ever handled a Broadwell chip? Anything above 1.35V from the VCCore (or whatever it's called in their BIOS) is bad for it and can speed up wear.
T
thibdu87
05-17-2016, 11:02 PM #11

Have you ever handled a Broadwell chip? Anything above 1.35V from the VCCore (or whatever it's called in their BIOS) is bad for it and can speed up wear.

N
NaiROolF
Senior Member
685
05-18-2016, 10:48 AM
#12
Imagine having a cooler with a better ID, similar to yours. You could push 1.75V on your E5400 for 4.8 or 4.9GHz. The real bottleneck is the cooler itself. Your board might have an auto-shutdown if it senses 1.9V or more, so it alerts you when voltage isn't safe. I accidentally put in 2V on my 45nm chip twice, but that’s just because the board turned off voltage detection via BIOS—voltages are still visible on the CPUZ. Still curious if newer boards have similar protection features.
N
NaiROolF
05-18-2016, 10:48 AM #12

Imagine having a cooler with a better ID, similar to yours. You could push 1.75V on your E5400 for 4.8 or 4.9GHz. The real bottleneck is the cooler itself. Your board might have an auto-shutdown if it senses 1.9V or more, so it alerts you when voltage isn't safe. I accidentally put in 2V on my 45nm chip twice, but that’s just because the board turned off voltage detection via BIOS—voltages are still visible on the CPUZ. Still curious if newer boards have similar protection features.

T
truji8tarifa
Member
193
05-18-2016, 07:40 PM
#13
I assure you these clocks are unreliable.
T
truji8tarifa
05-18-2016, 07:40 PM #13

I assure you these clocks are unreliable.

C
ChristobalMC_
Member
102
05-18-2016, 09:33 PM
#14
I've worked with core chips and pushing 1.75v is completely okay. I've also tried 2v and even booted with 2v without any issues. It hasn't degraded or failed at all. Probably these old CPUs are built to last, as some people have used them at 1.7v with 1.6v VTT on 45nm cores and still performed well after a month. I think this might be an older discussion thread, but I probably missed it in the forum.
C
ChristobalMC_
05-18-2016, 09:33 PM #14

I've worked with core chips and pushing 1.75v is completely okay. I've also tried 2v and even booted with 2v without any issues. It hasn't degraded or failed at all. Probably these old CPUs are built to last, as some people have used them at 1.7v with 1.6v VTT on 45nm cores and still performed well after a month. I think this might be an older discussion thread, but I probably missed it in the forum.

M
minedead278y
Member
65
05-25-2016, 06:12 PM
#15
These chips are vastly distinct from what Intel released after 2011, let alone comparable to Broadwell.
M
minedead278y
05-25-2016, 06:12 PM #15

These chips are vastly distinct from what Intel released after 2011, let alone comparable to Broadwell.

X
xl97
Member
104
05-26-2016, 02:37 AM
#16
The main issue is the PLD voltage. On the E5800 I can boot into BIOS around 5 or 5.01, but I need about 2V PLD. If it’s only 1.8V it works fine, but anything higher than that causes problems. Trying to raise it further would likely break the system, especially after the P4 631 failed from 2.4V at 5.656GHz. It’s tough—pushing voltage isn’t safe or comfortable for me.
X
xl97
05-26-2016, 02:37 AM #16

The main issue is the PLD voltage. On the E5800 I can boot into BIOS around 5 or 5.01, but I need about 2V PLD. If it’s only 1.8V it works fine, but anything higher than that causes problems. Trying to raise it further would likely break the system, especially after the P4 631 failed from 2.4V at 5.656GHz. It’s tough—pushing voltage isn’t safe or comfortable for me.

F
FrozenCinders
Junior Member
20
05-26-2016, 10:53 AM
#17
I don't understand why you keep discussing those designs while I'm just focusing on what needs to be done with Broadwell, right?
F
FrozenCinders
05-26-2016, 10:53 AM #17

I don't understand why you keep discussing those designs while I'm just focusing on what needs to be done with Broadwell, right?

C
CoolCow247
Member
105
05-26-2016, 11:16 AM
#18
I have nothing better than my E5400. The latest CPUs I can reach are some mediocre Gen-9 Lake chips, like the Celeron N4000. They easily outperform my 45nm processors at standard speeds. Is Broadwell or the 5000/6000 series better for you?
C
CoolCow247
05-26-2016, 11:16 AM #18

I have nothing better than my E5400. The latest CPUs I can reach are some mediocre Gen-9 Lake chips, like the Celeron N4000. They easily outperform my 45nm processors at standard speeds. Is Broadwell or the 5000/6000 series better for you?

A
AnnieDreams_
Member
67
05-26-2016, 11:25 AM
#19
Hey, I wasn’t that intense with those heavy voltage sessions back then—I could handle it in the summer unless it got really chilly. Now I’m using air conditioning, which is great.
A
AnnieDreams_
05-26-2016, 11:25 AM #19

Hey, I wasn’t that intense with those heavy voltage sessions back then—I could handle it in the summer unless it got really chilly. Now I’m using air conditioning, which is great.

C
carp3
Senior Member
572
05-26-2016, 02:08 PM
#20
Mainstream players expected around 5000 and HEDT around 6000 performance. This chip was Intel’s first 14mm design, full of issues, and never saw gaming chips because it lagged behind Haswell in speed and stability. That’s why Broadwell refresh models like the 4790K and 4690K were needed since mainstream buyers wouldn’t want them. Now I wonder why someone would answer such a crucial question without any background on these processors.
C
carp3
05-26-2016, 02:08 PM #20

Mainstream players expected around 5000 and HEDT around 6000 performance. This chip was Intel’s first 14mm design, full of issues, and never saw gaming chips because it lagged behind Haswell in speed and stability. That’s why Broadwell refresh models like the 4790K and 4690K were needed since mainstream buyers wouldn’t want them. Now I wonder why someone would answer such a crucial question without any background on these processors.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next