F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Celeron G3950 setup for Minecraft server Optimized configuration for smooth gameplay and performance

Celeron G3950 setup for Minecraft server Optimized configuration for smooth gameplay and performance

Celeron G3950 setup for Minecraft server Optimized configuration for smooth gameplay and performance

E
edo12121313
Junior Member
12
09-30-2016, 02:48 AM
#1
I have an older ASUS Z170-P motherboard running a Celeron G3950. I’m curious about its performance for hosting a Minecraft server with up to 15 players. No other tasks are available right now. Thanks ahead!
E
edo12121313
09-30-2016, 02:48 AM #1

I have an older ASUS Z170-P motherboard running a Celeron G3950. I’m curious about its performance for hosting a Minecraft server with up to 15 players. No other tasks are available right now. Thanks ahead!

F
Fantatrol_HD
Member
64
10-06-2016, 12:31 PM
#2
Terrible. This low-frequency dual-core device struggles to handle single-player performance, let alone 15.
F
Fantatrol_HD
10-06-2016, 12:31 PM #2

Terrible. This low-frequency dual-core device struggles to handle single-player performance, let alone 15.

P
Puppypower48
Member
147
10-10-2016, 03:38 AM
#3
I realized this too, really, I was just trying to find a purpose. It was only necessary to get an external validation.
P
Puppypower48
10-10-2016, 03:38 AM #3

I realized this too, really, I was just trying to find a purpose. It was only necessary to get an external validation.

B
Biiloute
Junior Member
27
10-10-2016, 03:58 AM
#4
It really depends on the setup and game. A basic 2-player version of e8400 can handle over 80fps with a decent render distance and enough RAM—possibly supporting 5 to 8 players. A Pentium would have been ideal, but testing it is worth considering. A cheaper quad-core i5 or even a Pentium would make a big difference.
B
Biiloute
10-10-2016, 03:58 AM #4

It really depends on the setup and game. A basic 2-player version of e8400 can handle over 80fps with a decent render distance and enough RAM—possibly supporting 5 to 8 players. A Pentium would have been ideal, but testing it is worth considering. A cheaper quad-core i5 or even a Pentium would make a big difference.

E
enderbrine5661
Junior Member
17
10-10-2016, 08:50 AM
#5
Frame rate isn't the main concern in Minecraft; missing redstone ticks are more noticeable. A slow CPU is usually caused by the latter, not the former.
E
enderbrine5661
10-10-2016, 08:50 AM #5

Frame rate isn't the main concern in Minecraft; missing redstone ticks are more noticeable. A slow CPU is usually caused by the latter, not the former.

J
Jordi0610
Junior Member
8
10-10-2016, 03:17 PM
#6
It really hinges on how intricate your redstone setup is. For a simple secret door, any PC should work fine. However, if you're managing a fully automated farm or handling destructive mods, you'll need a powerful CPU. It's not a major concern for casual players just exploring and defeating the enderdragon.
J
Jordi0610
10-10-2016, 03:17 PM #6

It really hinges on how intricate your redstone setup is. For a simple secret door, any PC should work fine. However, if you're managing a fully automated farm or handling destructive mods, you'll need a powerful CPU. It's not a major concern for casual players just exploring and defeating the enderdragon.

F
FairyGirl21
Member
193
10-10-2016, 11:36 PM
#7
Avoiding redstone ticks in the game doesn't just impact redstone players—it changes item drops, physics behavior, chunk loading, and more. On a 5010U (which runs about two-thirds the speed of a G3950), the game can process thousands of redstone ticks in minutes, making vanilla play feel unstable and glitchy.
F
FairyGirl21
10-10-2016, 11:36 PM #7

Avoiding redstone ticks in the game doesn't just impact redstone players—it changes item drops, physics behavior, chunk loading, and more. On a 5010U (which runs about two-thirds the speed of a G3950), the game can process thousands of redstone ticks in minutes, making vanilla play feel unstable and glitchy.

E
ErikPlays0605
Member
59
10-10-2016, 11:47 PM
#8
That's why I talked about farms rather than complicated computer stuff. (Auto farms usually put a strain on CPUs when things drop) But Minecraft works fine on a potato. I don't know about your 5010U, it runs well with low-end CPUs like an i3 3220 and affordable GPUs. EDIT: you should have mentioned "chunk updates" instead of "redstone ticks" because those are the official names for them (and that's the only one I'm aware of).
E
ErikPlays0605
10-10-2016, 11:47 PM #8

That's why I talked about farms rather than complicated computer stuff. (Auto farms usually put a strain on CPUs when things drop) But Minecraft works fine on a potato. I don't know about your 5010U, it runs well with low-end CPUs like an i3 3220 and affordable GPUs. EDIT: you should have mentioned "chunk updates" instead of "redstone ticks" because those are the official names for them (and that's the only one I'm aware of).

J
Jqcked
Junior Member
8
10-11-2016, 04:11 AM
#9
The system is redstone ticking, at least that’s what the old Minecraft debug screen said (around the 1.6 version). I didn’t even touch any of those features—just loading a standard world was enough to make things tough.
J
Jqcked
10-11-2016, 04:11 AM #9

The system is redstone ticking, at least that’s what the old Minecraft debug screen said (around the 1.6 version). I didn’t even touch any of those features—just loading a standard world was enough to make things tough.

C
CosmicStarsYT
Member
58
10-11-2016, 09:53 AM
#10
You can use Tuinity to manage the server efficiently. Preloading the world with a plugin like Chunky adds extra benefits. The CPU isn't always the fastest, but I've tested servers on slower machines too. Success depends mainly on how much you invest in optimization.
C
CosmicStarsYT
10-11-2016, 09:53 AM #10

You can use Tuinity to manage the server efficiently. Preloading the world with a plugin like Chunky adds extra benefits. The CPU isn't always the fastest, but I've tested servers on slower machines too. Success depends mainly on how much you invest in optimization.