F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Can you increase the clock speed of an Intel Core I5 750 processor?

Can you increase the clock speed of an Intel Core I5 750 processor?

Can you increase the clock speed of an Intel Core I5 750 processor?

C
CrazyBessyCat
Posting Freak
912
05-20-2016, 09:54 PM
#1
Hello everyone, I'm trying to increase my CPU's clock speed from 2.67ghz to 3.20ghz. Do you think it's possible? (I'm familiar with CPU overclocking)
System details:
- GigaByte motherboard GA-P55M-UD2
- Intel Core I5 750 at 2.67ghz
- GeForce GT 9800
- Corsair 12GB RAM at 1333mhz
- PSU SL-8500BTX
- Windows 10 PRO 64Bit
C
CrazyBessyCat
05-20-2016, 09:54 PM #1

Hello everyone, I'm trying to increase my CPU's clock speed from 2.67ghz to 3.20ghz. Do you think it's possible? (I'm familiar with CPU overclocking)
System details:
- GigaByte motherboard GA-P55M-UD2
- Intel Core I5 750 at 2.67ghz
- GeForce GT 9800
- Corsair 12GB RAM at 1333mhz
- PSU SL-8500BTX
- Windows 10 PRO 64Bit

E
Emperias
Junior Member
16
05-22-2016, 10:50 PM
#2
Technically, the BIOS settings are available, but many reviews on NewEgg mention that users experienced instability issues after overclocking their CPU. It seems unclear why someone would attempt this given the age of the chipset and its limited impact on current applications. Additionally, I’m concerned about overclocking a nearly nine-year-old component—it’s likely to fail soon, and stressing it further is unnecessary. I’m also puzzled about how you managed to run Windows 10 on such an old system.
E
Emperias
05-22-2016, 10:50 PM #2

Technically, the BIOS settings are available, but many reviews on NewEgg mention that users experienced instability issues after overclocking their CPU. It seems unclear why someone would attempt this given the age of the chipset and its limited impact on current applications. Additionally, I’m concerned about overclocking a nearly nine-year-old component—it’s likely to fail soon, and stressing it further is unnecessary. I’m also puzzled about how you managed to run Windows 10 on such an old system.

S
ShoowChoco
Member
71
05-23-2016, 05:14 AM
#3
If you believe it's possible, then go for it!... I'm looking into the most effective method to overclock my i7 950. Since it's nearly ten years old and mostly worthless now (except for the power supply and graphics card), I want to try doing it myself. If it fails or causes damage, I won't have lost much. It seems like a decision that matches yours! Good luck!
S
ShoowChoco
05-23-2016, 05:14 AM #3

If you believe it's possible, then go for it!... I'm looking into the most effective method to overclock my i7 950. Since it's nearly ten years old and mostly worthless now (except for the power supply and graphics card), I want to try doing it myself. If it fails or causes damage, I won't have lost much. It seems like a decision that matches yours! Good luck!

M
missbatmanxox
Member
111
06-13-2016, 06:25 AM
#4
No, it's secured, but if you understand how to bypass it then 3.3 ghz works fine
M
missbatmanxox
06-13-2016, 06:25 AM #4

No, it's secured, but if you understand how to bypass it then 3.3 ghz works fine

M
markrawle
Junior Member
8
06-13-2016, 02:26 PM
#5
Yes, it's possible to push the performance further. Assuming you have a suitable cooler (which isn't specified), the CPU should likely hit around 3.2GHz without major issues.

What are your plans for this system? I suspect the bottleneck will be the graphics card if you're aiming for gaming.
10tacle :
I'm not too keen on pushing an old chip to its limits. It's inevitable that either the CPU or the motherboard will fail eventually, so it might be better to let it age naturally rather than risking damage by overstressing it. I'm also surprised you managed to get Windows 10 running on such an outdated configuration.
CPU longevity is impressive. I still own a Socket 939 (dated mid-2006) with an Athlon 64 X2 that's been overclocked and is still functioning well, as well as a 45nm Xeon from the C2Q era running at 4.1GHz without any signs of slowing down. Both are older than the i5 model you mentioned, so it seems your setup is solid. Overclocking (mainly overvolting) does shorten the chip's life, but that's usually a trade-off for performance. It won't be a major issue unless it starts to fail prematurely.
Looking at the Pentium 4 and earlier Athlon models, you're in good shape.

As for Windows 10, it's not a slow system. While newer versions are faster, older systems still handle them reasonably well—except for very basic setups like the Atom 330 HTPC with limited RAM (2GB single channel DDR2 at 533MHz). It's running smoothly enough despite those constraints.
Kenton82 :
I'm looking for the optimal method to boost my i7 950's performance. Since it's nine years old, it's not much of a challenge.
Overclocking can indeed reduce the chip's lifespan slightly, but since we're talking decades, that's probably not a big concern. The system will likely become too slow for modern applications before it actually stops working. Think about the Pentium 4 and older Athlon 64/Phenom models—similar concerns apply.
Sandy Bridge and later versions are much faster, but they're still capable CPUs. Windows 10 also performs well on budget systems, though I haven't seen it run flawlessly on an older Atom 330 HTPC with limited resources.
Jake_142 :
It's not possible to unlock it, but reaching 3.3GHz is sufficient.
The first-generation Core i series can be overclocked without needing a multiplier unlock. On systems using the 1156/1366 architecture, the system bus clock ran at 133MHZ and wasn't constrained by older models like SB or newer ones. This allowed for much higher speeds than in today's Core i systems, enabling a significant boost similar to older FSB-based setups.
M
markrawle
06-13-2016, 02:26 PM #5

Yes, it's possible to push the performance further. Assuming you have a suitable cooler (which isn't specified), the CPU should likely hit around 3.2GHz without major issues.

What are your plans for this system? I suspect the bottleneck will be the graphics card if you're aiming for gaming.
10tacle :
I'm not too keen on pushing an old chip to its limits. It's inevitable that either the CPU or the motherboard will fail eventually, so it might be better to let it age naturally rather than risking damage by overstressing it. I'm also surprised you managed to get Windows 10 running on such an outdated configuration.
CPU longevity is impressive. I still own a Socket 939 (dated mid-2006) with an Athlon 64 X2 that's been overclocked and is still functioning well, as well as a 45nm Xeon from the C2Q era running at 4.1GHz without any signs of slowing down. Both are older than the i5 model you mentioned, so it seems your setup is solid. Overclocking (mainly overvolting) does shorten the chip's life, but that's usually a trade-off for performance. It won't be a major issue unless it starts to fail prematurely.
Looking at the Pentium 4 and earlier Athlon models, you're in good shape.

As for Windows 10, it's not a slow system. While newer versions are faster, older systems still handle them reasonably well—except for very basic setups like the Atom 330 HTPC with limited RAM (2GB single channel DDR2 at 533MHz). It's running smoothly enough despite those constraints.
Kenton82 :
I'm looking for the optimal method to boost my i7 950's performance. Since it's nine years old, it's not much of a challenge.
Overclocking can indeed reduce the chip's lifespan slightly, but since we're talking decades, that's probably not a big concern. The system will likely become too slow for modern applications before it actually stops working. Think about the Pentium 4 and older Athlon 64/Phenom models—similar concerns apply.
Sandy Bridge and later versions are much faster, but they're still capable CPUs. Windows 10 also performs well on budget systems, though I haven't seen it run flawlessly on an older Atom 330 HTPC with limited resources.
Jake_142 :
It's not possible to unlock it, but reaching 3.3GHz is sufficient.
The first-generation Core i series can be overclocked without needing a multiplier unlock. On systems using the 1156/1366 architecture, the system bus clock ran at 133MHZ and wasn't constrained by older models like SB or newer ones. This allowed for much higher speeds than in today's Core i systems, enabling a significant boost similar to older FSB-based setups.