F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Cable for Ethernet and fiber optics connection

Cable for Ethernet and fiber optics connection

Cable for Ethernet and fiber optics connection

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3
A
AaAschy
Junior Member
29
08-06-2025, 11:24 AM
#21
The line between considering long-term compatibility and taking extreme actions often blurs when expectations become unrealistic or pressures mount.
A
AaAschy
08-06-2025, 11:24 AM #21

The line between considering long-term compatibility and taking extreme actions often blurs when expectations become unrealistic or pressures mount.

W
WH0LEF33D
Member
141
08-06-2025, 01:34 PM
#22
It seems the location of that line isn't clear. Could you provide more details or clarify?
W
WH0LEF33D
08-06-2025, 01:34 PM #22

It seems the location of that line isn't clear. Could you provide more details or clarify?

N
Naethros
Junior Member
49
08-24-2025, 08:38 PM
#23
Many people remain unclear about their actual bandwidth needs; even fast Ethernet can barely fill a single channel. Although CAT6 may seem excessive, its cost advantage makes it worthwhile... probably. I find it funny how some claim CAT7 improved performance when it didn’t really matter.
N
Naethros
08-24-2025, 08:38 PM #23

Many people remain unclear about their actual bandwidth needs; even fast Ethernet can barely fill a single channel. Although CAT6 may seem excessive, its cost advantage makes it worthwhile... probably. I find it funny how some claim CAT7 improved performance when it didn’t really matter.

M
MettaloCaft
Senior Member
396
09-13-2025, 07:13 PM
#24
I agree with that assessment. The price gap between Cat 6 and the 5e version seems comparable. I’m choosing Cat 6 mainly because it’s a bit more reliable and less prone to interference. As for Cat 7, it’s often claimed to support 40 Gbps, but that’s still a long way off—most people are focusing on 10 Gbps now, which is starting to become more accessible.
M
MettaloCaft
09-13-2025, 07:13 PM #24

I agree with that assessment. The price gap between Cat 6 and the 5e version seems comparable. I’m choosing Cat 6 mainly because it’s a bit more reliable and less prone to interference. As for Cat 7, it’s often claimed to support 40 Gbps, but that’s still a long way off—most people are focusing on 10 Gbps now, which is starting to become more accessible.

S
Sufie
Member
51
09-14-2025, 08:58 PM
#25
The cost savings are worth it just to upgrade to Cat6. Ten gigabits is thrilling, but most people can't even approach using it, let alone reach 99.9% speeds. I have ten gigabits at home and with five 4K TVs, two PCs, four phones, Google Home devices, I typically get about 120-140 Mbps. Unless everyone starts using network traffic and sending 8K uncompressed video, one gigabit of Cat6 is more than sufficient! I really don’t know how to hit 40 gigabits without moving big files.
S
Sufie
09-14-2025, 08:58 PM #25

The cost savings are worth it just to upgrade to Cat6. Ten gigabits is thrilling, but most people can't even approach using it, let alone reach 99.9% speeds. I have ten gigabits at home and with five 4K TVs, two PCs, four phones, Google Home devices, I typically get about 120-140 Mbps. Unless everyone starts using network traffic and sending 8K uncompressed video, one gigabit of Cat6 is more than sufficient! I really don’t know how to hit 40 gigabits without moving big files.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3