Cable Ethernet used for connecting devices.
Cable Ethernet used for connecting devices.
Never considered that before purchasing that item. Could this setup function with CAT 5 and CAT 6 cables? The outlet plates would be CAT 6.
In this diagram, you've set up a CHANNEL. The largest patch cables allowed are 328 feet. The question arises: why choose Cat5e cables when the Permanent Link is Cat6? If you're operating at 1G, it should be sufficient. However, if you plan to transmit 10G, it may not work. A Fluke Certifier would likely approve your properly installed Permanent Link but would likely fail the channel overall.
Yes, it should function properly. Your performance will be constrained by the weakest link in the sequence. Using cat5e and cat6 together can mimic cat5e, offering up to 2.5 gbps or 1 gbps with standard Ethernet cards. In real scenarios, if the cat5e cables are short (1-3m) and the total length is under 40 meters, you should maintain around 10 gbps without noticeable issues (errors corrected). Consider Cat6 or Cat6a cables—they’re affordable. You don’t have to invest in UV-resistant or premium cables; sometimes buying generic plastic conduits or cable trays at stores like Home Depot, Praktiker, or Ikea is more economical.
The setup wasn't feasible because the cable length and configuration exceeded acceptable limits. The forum discussion suggests a shorter total run, so using higher-grade cables like Cat6 or Cat5e is recommended. Budget constraints might push for cheaper options, but performance limitations remain. The powerline adapters from TP Link included CAT5, which is a bit better than Cat5e but still not ideal for high-speed needs.