F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Cable connection for phone jack via Ethernet

Cable connection for phone jack via Ethernet

Cable connection for phone jack via Ethernet

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
166
10-30-2016, 05:28 PM
#1
I set up my internet in an upstairs room near the phone line. Downstairs I have my computer and phone jack, but space is tight. Bringing the modem downstairs is inconvenient, and I’m limited to Wi-Fi now. I’m wondering if there’s another way to use the phone jack without moving the modem. I’ve considered power adapters, but I’m not sure they’re worth it for me.
S
Sailor_Does_MC
10-30-2016, 05:28 PM #1

I set up my internet in an upstairs room near the phone line. Downstairs I have my computer and phone jack, but space is tight. Bringing the modem downstairs is inconvenient, and I’m limited to Wi-Fi now. I’m wondering if there’s another way to use the phone jack without moving the modem. I’ve considered power adapters, but I’m not sure they’re worth it for me.

X
XknockMC
Member
121
11-02-2016, 05:32 PM
#2
You can't use your jack since Ethernet requires a minimum of two pairs (four wires). I’d consider going with Ethernet over power instead—it’s clearly the superior option.
X
XknockMC
11-02-2016, 05:32 PM #2

You can't use your jack since Ethernet requires a minimum of two pairs (four wires). I’d consider going with Ethernet over power instead—it’s clearly the superior option.

X
xAquamarine
Member
70
11-04-2016, 10:36 AM
#3
It's possible with only 100MB using two pairs of cables; you might connect RJ11 first, then RJ45, followed by the wall jack, and finally the computer. But this setup could interfere with phones or modems above. I think the signals are distinct, though it might cause problems. If you have a crimper, you can splice them together—RJ45 over RJ11, then RJ11 over the wall jack, etc. If budget allows, spending around $50 on a powerline adapter would work well for higher speeds.
X
xAquamarine
11-04-2016, 10:36 AM #3

It's possible with only 100MB using two pairs of cables; you might connect RJ11 first, then RJ45, followed by the wall jack, and finally the computer. But this setup could interfere with phones or modems above. I think the signals are distinct, though it might cause problems. If you have a crimper, you can splice them together—RJ45 over RJ11, then RJ11 over the wall jack, etc. If budget allows, spending around $50 on a powerline adapter would work well for higher speeds.

T
240
11-04-2016, 11:26 AM
#4
You already have a phone cable from your modem to where you plan to use the wired connection. You’re looking to swap it for Ethernet if feasible. If not, powerlines might be an option. Keep in mind that ideally your powerline adapter and receiver should be near each other on the electrical circuit, avoiding the breaker box. We have Devolo powerlines at home and are satisfied with them; they no longer seem to be widely available. Depending on your ISP’s speed, you might need a more powerful set—like 1.2Gbps—for high internal speeds between devices such as a laptop and storage.
T
TheDonnelTrain
11-04-2016, 11:26 AM #4

You already have a phone cable from your modem to where you plan to use the wired connection. You’re looking to swap it for Ethernet if feasible. If not, powerlines might be an option. Keep in mind that ideally your powerline adapter and receiver should be near each other on the electrical circuit, avoiding the breaker box. We have Devolo powerlines at home and are satisfied with them; they no longer seem to be widely available. Depending on your ISP’s speed, you might need a more powerful set—like 1.2Gbps—for high internal speeds between devices such as a laptop and storage.

K
kreptedcannon
Member
227
11-08-2016, 01:14 AM
#5
It looks like a smart price. Back then, we spent more than €100 for a bundle including a 500Mbps adapter and receiver with 3*LAN and Wi-Fi.
K
kreptedcannon
11-08-2016, 01:14 AM #5

It looks like a smart price. Back then, we spent more than €100 for a bundle including a 500Mbps adapter and receiver with 3*LAN and Wi-Fi.

D
Dual_Wielder_
Junior Member
14
11-27-2016, 09:41 PM
#6
They mentioned the early speeds were quite expensive, even at 200mbit/s. I believe I'm running a slightly newer setup with a phone and AP, which is functioning perfectly.
D
Dual_Wielder_
11-27-2016, 09:41 PM #6

They mentioned the early speeds were quite expensive, even at 200mbit/s. I believe I'm running a slightly newer setup with a phone and AP, which is functioning perfectly.

S
staairs
Junior Member
13
12-04-2016, 08:48 PM
#7
The primary issue involves most internal phone wires being just one pair. The second pair remains idle at the NID, indicating possibly insufficient pairs overall.
S
staairs
12-04-2016, 08:48 PM #7

The primary issue involves most internal phone wires being just one pair. The second pair remains idle at the NID, indicating possibly insufficient pairs overall.

C
chikimonster
Member
151
12-08-2016, 05:00 PM
#8
Most US homes are two walls away from the wall, unless they're very old—which can happen. It's smart to check before investing any funds (though if you must spend, consider powerline). Still, it's unclear whether using it would affect DSL service.
C
chikimonster
12-08-2016, 05:00 PM #8

Most US homes are two walls away from the wall, unless they're very old—which can happen. It's smart to check before investing any funds (though if you must spend, consider powerline). Still, it's unclear whether using it would affect DSL service.

U
UltimaArtz
Member
64
12-08-2016, 05:32 PM
#9
It's a much higher frequency, which shouldn't affect DSL...DSL is the problem with DSL...lol
U
UltimaArtz
12-08-2016, 05:32 PM #9

It's a much higher frequency, which shouldn't affect DSL...DSL is the problem with DSL...lol

T
TheFamousFilms
Junior Member
16
12-08-2016, 05:50 PM
#10
I’d need a new router, and I was thinking about a model supporting 5GHz/ac. If the wiring is outdated—probably because of an older home—I might be holding back.
T
TheFamousFilms
12-08-2016, 05:50 PM #10

I’d need a new router, and I was thinking about a model supporting 5GHz/ac. If the wiring is outdated—probably because of an older home—I might be holding back.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next