F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Bus frequency stands at 99.98 MHz, not the standard 100 MHz.

Bus frequency stands at 99.98 MHz, not the standard 100 MHz.

Bus frequency stands at 99.98 MHz, not the standard 100 MHz.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
B
bengalwatcher
Posting Freak
801
07-13-2016, 12:51 AM
#1
It’s not 100MHz because your current overclock setting is 4.398.97GHz, not the default 4.4GHz. The CPUZ shows a higher value due to the specific overclock configuration you’re using.
B
bengalwatcher
07-13-2016, 12:51 AM #1

It’s not 100MHz because your current overclock setting is 4.398.97GHz, not the default 4.4GHz. The CPUZ shows a higher value due to the specific overclock configuration you’re using.

1
10ukkie10
Member
180
07-13-2016, 07:28 AM
#2
It explains how overclocking functions.
1
10ukkie10
07-13-2016, 07:28 AM #2

It explains how overclocking functions.

B
BroZockerLuca
Member
73
07-13-2016, 08:35 AM
#3
CPU fluctuates around 4.400GHz instead of staying steady; the behavior is essentially typical, and similar patterns occur with BCLK as well, with a small change of about 0.0013GHz unlikely to cause major issues.
B
BroZockerLuca
07-13-2016, 08:35 AM #3

CPU fluctuates around 4.400GHz instead of staying steady; the behavior is essentially typical, and similar patterns occur with BCLK as well, with a small change of about 0.0013GHz unlikely to cause major issues.

B
BlueStar_LH
Posting Freak
842
07-13-2016, 10:24 AM
#4
Absolutely typical.
B
BlueStar_LH
07-13-2016, 10:24 AM #4

Absolutely typical.

S
SuperScout345
Member
217
07-13-2016, 05:37 PM
#5
Ignored the update, showing 100MHz which equals 4.399 GHz.
S
SuperScout345
07-13-2016, 05:37 PM #5

Ignored the update, showing 100MHz which equals 4.399 GHz.

K
Krazykitten
Junior Member
31
07-15-2016, 02:48 AM
#6
That's just a tiny 0.00103MHz variation, not a big deal. Don't stress about it.
K
Krazykitten
07-15-2016, 02:48 AM #6

That's just a tiny 0.00103MHz variation, not a big deal. Don't stress about it.

F
FeetGreen
Junior Member
47
07-20-2016, 03:45 PM
#7
Counting up to 100,000,000 every second seems simple, but it’s actually more challenging than it looks. Accuracy isn’t the main concern here, so they opted for a cost-effective approach.
F
FeetGreen
07-20-2016, 03:45 PM #7

Counting up to 100,000,000 every second seems simple, but it’s actually more challenging than it looks. Accuracy isn’t the main concern here, so they opted for a cost-effective approach.

R
Rank_plains
Junior Member
16
07-22-2016, 03:14 PM
#8
All CPU did this from the cheap ass Pentium 1 to expensive 5960X, so dont worry
R
Rank_plains
07-22-2016, 03:14 PM #8

All CPU did this from the cheap ass Pentium 1 to expensive 5960X, so dont worry

D
Dacaspex
Member
156
07-22-2016, 05:14 PM
#9
The base clock isn't perfectly steady—everything in a PC changes slightly. It tends to hover near 100, but it can drift or stay far from that value depending on the specific component. This isn't a major issue.
D
Dacaspex
07-22-2016, 05:14 PM #9

The base clock isn't perfectly steady—everything in a PC changes slightly. It tends to hover near 100, but it can drift or stay far from that value depending on the specific component. This isn't a major issue.

S
Sp00key
Junior Member
9
07-23-2016, 12:29 AM
#10
Bruh, I don’t think you grasp how CPUs function. They handle data and operate at a pace they can only closely estimate for themselves. A processor locks into a specific frequency and we rely on that setting. At 4.4GHz, each cycle lasts a tiny part of a nanosecond. Most tools can’t capture events that occur so rapidly. It’s sufficient to time them down to milliseconds. It’s similar to a mechanical clock. The parts inside don’t know the speed; they just function as designed. An outside observer is needed to determine the exact rate.
S
Sp00key
07-23-2016, 12:29 AM #10

Bruh, I don’t think you grasp how CPUs function. They handle data and operate at a pace they can only closely estimate for themselves. A processor locks into a specific frequency and we rely on that setting. At 4.4GHz, each cycle lasts a tiny part of a nanosecond. Most tools can’t capture events that occur so rapidly. It’s sufficient to time them down to milliseconds. It’s similar to a mechanical clock. The parts inside don’t know the speed; they just function as designed. An outside observer is needed to determine the exact rate.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next