F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems BSOD occurs often. (resolved)

BSOD occurs often. (resolved)

BSOD occurs often. (resolved)

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
N
ndiezel
Member
60
12-25-2025, 12:27 AM
#1
Hi everyone,
I'm experiencing several BSODs lately, often showing errors such as irql_not_less_or_equal or hypervisor issues. I ran memtest on my RAM and all tests passed. I also stress-tested the CPU and GPU, and there were no problems even at low temperatures. The only part I couldn't verify was the motherboard (B350m Tomahawk, in use for three years).

What I did:
- Updated drivers for the GPU using ddu
- Reinstalled chipset and CPU drivers
- Tested each RAM individually
- Switched RAM positions to see if crashes changed (initial: slots 2 & 4, then 1 & 3, then 2, then 1)
- Used BlueScreenView to analyze the dump files; BSODs were linked to ntoskrnl.exe, but I’m unsure how to resolve them
- Ran sfc /scannow without issues
- Did not overclock any devices
- Reset CMOS

At this stage, I’m unsure what further testing is needed.
I have the dump file available for analysis if anyone wants to help.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/2yaxqhz6m...p.rar/file
N
ndiezel
12-25-2025, 12:27 AM #1

Hi everyone,
I'm experiencing several BSODs lately, often showing errors such as irql_not_less_or_equal or hypervisor issues. I ran memtest on my RAM and all tests passed. I also stress-tested the CPU and GPU, and there were no problems even at low temperatures. The only part I couldn't verify was the motherboard (B350m Tomahawk, in use for three years).

What I did:
- Updated drivers for the GPU using ddu
- Reinstalled chipset and CPU drivers
- Tested each RAM individually
- Switched RAM positions to see if crashes changed (initial: slots 2 & 4, then 1 & 3, then 2, then 1)
- Used BlueScreenView to analyze the dump files; BSODs were linked to ntoskrnl.exe, but I’m unsure how to resolve them
- Ran sfc /scannow without issues
- Did not overclock any devices
- Reset CMOS

At this stage, I’m unsure what further testing is needed.
I have the dump file available for analysis if anyone wants to help.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/2yaxqhz6m...p.rar/file

S
spadewade101
Member
205
12-25-2025, 12:27 AM
#2
verify your power cord
also check your power supply and graphics card
ensure the chipset driver and BIOS are both current
S
spadewade101
12-25-2025, 12:27 AM #2

verify your power cord
also check your power supply and graphics card
ensure the chipset driver and BIOS are both current

Y
YoungVerzide
Member
180
12-25-2025, 12:27 AM
#3
Power cord connected fully. I'm running Rosewill capstone 650w and Zotac rtx 3070 Twin Edge with Ryzen 5 3600.
I've updated the chipset and bios too.
Update: After replacing a new pair of RAM, it still crashed, but the RAM seems fine.
Y
YoungVerzide
12-25-2025, 12:27 AM #3

Power cord connected fully. I'm running Rosewill capstone 650w and Zotac rtx 3070 Twin Edge with Ryzen 5 3600.
I've updated the chipset and bios too.
Update: After replacing a new pair of RAM, it still crashed, but the RAM seems fine.

R
RiverStar12
Junior Member
6
12-25-2025, 12:27 AM
#4
Almost no details regarding this bug check have been shared. As the title implies, it functions as a Hyper V exception.
R
RiverStar12
12-25-2025, 12:27 AM #4

Almost no details regarding this bug check have been shared. As the title implies, it functions as a Hyper V exception.

1
10th_Doctor_
Posting Freak
768
12-25-2025, 12:28 AM
#5
I also noticed that so I attempted to turn off virtualization in BIOS. It still crashed, but the unusual aspect is that when virtualization is enabled, the BSOD error changes to a Hypervisor Error. When virtualization is disabled, the error differs, usually showing rql_not_less_or_equal. Can I try testing the CPU somehow? I ran stress tests and it worked without any issues.
1
10th_Doctor_
12-25-2025, 12:28 AM #5

I also noticed that so I attempted to turn off virtualization in BIOS. It still crashed, but the unusual aspect is that when virtualization is enabled, the BSOD error changes to a Hypervisor Error. When virtualization is disabled, the error differs, usually showing rql_not_less_or_equal. Can I try testing the CPU somehow? I ran stress tests and it worked without any issues.

M
Maisiemoo12
Member
154
12-25-2025, 12:28 AM
#6
Check this out!
Rich (BB code):
IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL (a)
A try was made to reach a pageable or invalid address during an interrupt request level (IRQL) that exceeds the allowed limit. This typically happens when drivers use incorrect addresses.
If a kernel debugger is accessible, retrieve the stack trace.
Arguments:
Arg1: 0000000000000080, memory accessed
Arg2: 0000000000000002, IRQL
Arg3: 0000000000000001, bitfield:
bit 0 : value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation
bit 3 : value 0 = not an execute operation, 1 = execute operation (only on chips supporting this level)
Arg4: fffff80709c2ef21, address that was referenced
The system experienced two crashes on this file! The second crash triggered a Hyper v exception once more. Likely connected to CPU interrupts – addresses being accessed.
Rich (BB code):
8: kd> KnL
# Child-SP RetAddr Call Site
00 ffffc88c`4a3a9a78 fffff807`09c2de29 nt!KeBugCheckEx
01 ffffc88c`4a3a9a80 fffff807`09c29289 nt!KiBugCheckDispatch+0x69
02 ffffc88c`4a3a9bc0 fffff807`09c2ef21
nt!KiPageFault+0x489
03 ffffc88c`4a3a9d58 fffff807`09bcb587 nt!memset+0x61
04 ffffc88c`4a3a9d60 fffff807`09d42560
nt!HvcallInitiateHypercall+0x57
05 ffffc88c`4a3a9de0 fffff807`09d6589a nt!HvlNotifyRootCrashdump+0x68
06 ffffc88c`4a3a9e50 fffff807`09c18087 nt!KeBugCheck2+0xca
07 ffffc88c`4a3aa5c0 fffff807`09c97d4e nt!KeBugCheckEx+0x107
08 ffffc88c`4a3aa600 fffff807`09c921bc nt!MiCheckSystemNxFault+0x1f638a
09 ffffc88c`4a3aa640 fffff807`09a30213 nt!MiRaisedIrqlFault+0x200e38
0a ffffc88c`4a3aa690 fffff807`09c2917e nt!MmAccessFault+0x363
0b ffffc88c`4a3aa7b0 fffff807`09af7420
nt!KiPageFault+0x37e
0c ffffc88c`4a3aa940 00000000`00000000
nt!KxReleaseQueuedSpinLock
Prime95. In fact, based on my experience, it’s not always the case that every CPU fails under stress testing. It might be wiser to test with a different processor.
M
Maisiemoo12
12-25-2025, 12:28 AM #6

Check this out!
Rich (BB code):
IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL (a)
A try was made to reach a pageable or invalid address during an interrupt request level (IRQL) that exceeds the allowed limit. This typically happens when drivers use incorrect addresses.
If a kernel debugger is accessible, retrieve the stack trace.
Arguments:
Arg1: 0000000000000080, memory accessed
Arg2: 0000000000000002, IRQL
Arg3: 0000000000000001, bitfield:
bit 0 : value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation
bit 3 : value 0 = not an execute operation, 1 = execute operation (only on chips supporting this level)
Arg4: fffff80709c2ef21, address that was referenced
The system experienced two crashes on this file! The second crash triggered a Hyper v exception once more. Likely connected to CPU interrupts – addresses being accessed.
Rich (BB code):
8: kd> KnL
# Child-SP RetAddr Call Site
00 ffffc88c`4a3a9a78 fffff807`09c2de29 nt!KeBugCheckEx
01 ffffc88c`4a3a9a80 fffff807`09c29289 nt!KiBugCheckDispatch+0x69
02 ffffc88c`4a3a9bc0 fffff807`09c2ef21
nt!KiPageFault+0x489
03 ffffc88c`4a3a9d58 fffff807`09bcb587 nt!memset+0x61
04 ffffc88c`4a3a9d60 fffff807`09d42560
nt!HvcallInitiateHypercall+0x57
05 ffffc88c`4a3a9de0 fffff807`09d6589a nt!HvlNotifyRootCrashdump+0x68
06 ffffc88c`4a3a9e50 fffff807`09c18087 nt!KeBugCheck2+0xca
07 ffffc88c`4a3aa5c0 fffff807`09c97d4e nt!KeBugCheckEx+0x107
08 ffffc88c`4a3aa600 fffff807`09c921bc nt!MiCheckSystemNxFault+0x1f638a
09 ffffc88c`4a3aa640 fffff807`09a30213 nt!MiRaisedIrqlFault+0x200e38
0a ffffc88c`4a3aa690 fffff807`09c2917e nt!MmAccessFault+0x363
0b ffffc88c`4a3aa7b0 fffff807`09af7420
nt!KiPageFault+0x37e
0c ffffc88c`4a3aa940 00000000`00000000
nt!KxReleaseQueuedSpinLock
Prime95. In fact, based on my experience, it’s not always the case that every CPU fails under stress testing. It might be wiser to test with a different processor.

R
ReborntoKill
Posting Freak
821
12-25-2025, 12:28 AM
#7
I just tested prime95 and occt, and some cores aren't working properly. Is this the issue? OCCT reported errors right away when I started using it.
https://imgur.com/a/3hW30VV
R
ReborntoKill
12-25-2025, 12:28 AM #7

I just tested prime95 and occt, and some cores aren't working properly. Is this the issue? OCCT reported errors right away when I started using it.
https://imgur.com/a/3hW30VV

V
Vector_VIP
Junior Member
35
12-25-2025, 12:28 AM
#8
There are numerous elements influencing Prime95's performance. Let's review the tests conducted. Examples include Small, Smallest, Large...
V
Vector_VIP
12-25-2025, 12:28 AM #8

There are numerous elements influencing Prime95's performance. Let's review the tests conducted. Examples include Small, Smallest, Large...

R
ReiltasGaming
Junior Member
12
12-25-2025, 12:28 AM
#9
Used the standard setting.
R
ReiltasGaming
12-25-2025, 12:28 AM #9

Used the standard setting.

M
Mannagryn1
Member
122
12-25-2025, 12:28 AM
#10
Blend is a demanding process that impacts various components. It can be challenging to grasp. For the CPU, it's best to opt for the simplest and most minimal tests.
M
Mannagryn1
12-25-2025, 12:28 AM #10

Blend is a demanding process that impacts various components. It can be challenging to grasp. For the CPU, it's best to opt for the simplest and most minimal tests.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next