BF3 generally offers better MAPs compared to BF4 Premium (both).
BF3 generally offers better MAPs compared to BF4 Premium (both).
BF3 offers extensive canal and metro routes. BFBC2 had the top maps in the series, though I think so.
Battlefield titles are excellent, yet levelcap posted a video comparing BF3 and BF4. http://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?...ploademail
BF3 offers superior maps, yet BF4 stands out as a significantly improved experience. I wish they would update BF3 more often, since its maps are the most compelling part of the game.
Bad Company 2 stands out as the top choice. Battlefield 4 closely resembles Battlefield 3, which initially seemed like just a rebrand. I favor the earlier title's mechanics. Still, I’d pay for BF4’s updates since it’s newer. But that wasn’t your request. I think Battlefield 3 offers more distinctive maps than its successor. Both games struggled with impressive destruction, but 3 delivered it better. With that kind of impact, you’ll remember the scenes of shattering walls over tanks. Regarding map layout, Battlefield 4’s designs feel awkward. Operation Locker attempts to blend cold weather with indoor action, but it falls flat—play becomes confined and restrictive on servers with around 16 players. For open areas, building placement feels unnatural, making it easy for snipers to target. The only standout map in BF4 is Golmud Railway, which shines mainly in Conquest Large. Battlefield 3’s maps are diverse—close encounters and armored challenges provided varied experiences. BF4’s feel is more mechanical and less engaging.