F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Asrock h97m pro4 OC

Asrock h97m pro4 OC

Asrock h97m pro4 OC

D
deathleaf
Member
108
01-23-2016, 04:51 AM
#1
Hi,
I'm currently overclocking an i7 4790k on an Asrock H97m pro4 with BIOS 1.90 that supports overclocking. At 4.6Ghz @1.210vcore and 1.900vccin, I notice the issue only appears when trying to hit 4.7Ghz, which seems unusually high. I checked at 4.7Ghz @1.23 and it crashed. My PSU is an evga supernova g3 750w. Is this a normal behavior?
D
deathleaf
01-23-2016, 04:51 AM #1

Hi,
I'm currently overclocking an i7 4790k on an Asrock H97m pro4 with BIOS 1.90 that supports overclocking. At 4.6Ghz @1.210vcore and 1.900vccin, I notice the issue only appears when trying to hit 4.7Ghz, which seems unusually high. I checked at 4.7Ghz @1.23 and it crashed. My PSU is an evga supernova g3 750w. Is this a normal behavior?

J
JonaxWTF
Member
221
01-23-2016, 01:04 PM
#2
You can enjoy 4.6 Ghz with just 1.21V. Intel's specifications allow up to 1.35V for extended use, leaving room for further adjustments. The main consideration is whether the extra 100 MHz is worth the higher voltage, increased heat, and power usage. It might be better to settle at 4.6 and remain satisfied with that setting.
J
JonaxWTF
01-23-2016, 01:04 PM #2

You can enjoy 4.6 Ghz with just 1.21V. Intel's specifications allow up to 1.35V for extended use, leaving room for further adjustments. The main consideration is whether the extra 100 MHz is worth the higher voltage, increased heat, and power usage. It might be better to settle at 4.6 and remain satisfied with that setting.

X
xIEruptor
Junior Member
1
01-25-2016, 10:47 AM
#3
You can enjoy 4.6 Ghz with just 1.21V. Intel's specifications allow up to 1.35V for longer use, leaving room for further adjustments. The main question is whether it's worth increasing the frequency by 100 MHz for a higher voltage and more heat and power usage. I'd prefer to keep at 4.6 and be content with that setting.
X
xIEruptor
01-25-2016, 10:47 AM #3

You can enjoy 4.6 Ghz with just 1.21V. Intel's specifications allow up to 1.35V for longer use, leaving room for further adjustments. The main question is whether it's worth increasing the frequency by 100 MHz for a higher voltage and more heat and power usage. I'd prefer to keep at 4.6 and be content with that setting.

G
Grimm_E
Member
103
02-08-2016, 04:56 PM
#4
That's what I expected, but this 100Mhz causes me to score over 60 in Cinebench lol
G
Grimm_E
02-08-2016, 04:56 PM #4

That's what I expected, but this 100Mhz causes me to score over 60 in Cinebench lol

M
MarioCovrigel
Member
195
02-08-2016, 05:38 PM
#5
Do those 60 points hold any value for you?
😉
If they do, don't hesitate to try. In my opinion, it's better to aim for "optimum overclock" (reaching the highest possible speed before voltage must jump sharply to maintain frequency). This way, the CPU stays cooler, and the performance gap remains minimal.
M
MarioCovrigel
02-08-2016, 05:38 PM #5

Do those 60 points hold any value for you?
😉
If they do, don't hesitate to try. In my opinion, it's better to aim for "optimum overclock" (reaching the highest possible speed before voltage must jump sharply to maintain frequency). This way, the CPU stays cooler, and the performance gap remains minimal.