F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming ARMA 3 APEX is amazing

ARMA 3 APEX is amazing

ARMA 3 APEX is amazing

L
LumpiVader
Junior Member
31
03-09-2023, 12:16 AM
#1
I received the DLC with some exciting new features, but wow. The enhancements are incredible. The audio is great, the weapons perform well, and enemies now die with ragdolls for a more realistic feel. The lightning system is impressive. Arma 3 used to have poor optimization, especially in dense jungle areas, but this DLC and its upgrades make it look much more polished. With these changes, Arma 3 appears better than ever, and I’m actually maintaining a steady 50 FPS compared to my usual 30-40 FPS on standard maps!
L
LumpiVader
03-09-2023, 12:16 AM #1

I received the DLC with some exciting new features, but wow. The enhancements are incredible. The audio is great, the weapons perform well, and enemies now die with ragdolls for a more realistic feel. The lightning system is impressive. Arma 3 used to have poor optimization, especially in dense jungle areas, but this DLC and its upgrades make it look much more polished. With these changes, Arma 3 appears better than ever, and I’m actually maintaining a steady 50 FPS compared to my usual 30-40 FPS on standard maps!

A
AthenasLight
Posting Freak
781
03-10-2023, 08:53 AM
#2
too much
A
AthenasLight
03-10-2023, 08:53 AM #2

too much

N
NINJA5011
Member
82
03-11-2023, 03:31 AM
#3
It cost just $27 when I received it, and I’d pay around $60 for this DLC. The game is significantly more enjoyable now.
N
NINJA5011
03-11-2023, 03:31 AM #3

It cost just $27 when I received it, and I’d pay around $60 for this DLC. The game is significantly more enjoyable now.

A
a1ex2410
Member
56
03-11-2023, 04:45 AM
#4
nah
A
a1ex2410
03-11-2023, 04:45 AM #4

nah

Z
Zam_GM
Member
158
03-11-2023, 05:17 AM
#5
It looks like you're excited about your upcoming purchase!
Z
Zam_GM
03-11-2023, 05:17 AM #5

It looks like you're excited about your upcoming purchase!

E
EX232621
Junior Member
11
03-11-2023, 05:37 AM
#6
It's pleasant, but I'd like to see a real campaign mode option. Currently, it feels like you can't join a few teammates when you start solo play.
E
EX232621
03-11-2023, 05:37 AM #6

It's pleasant, but I'd like to see a real campaign mode option. Currently, it feels like you can't join a few teammates when you start solo play.

T
147
03-11-2023, 06:53 AM
#7
Delaying additional funds until the December 12th support update
T
TannerBannaner
03-11-2023, 06:53 AM #7

Delaying additional funds until the December 12th support update

W
137
03-24-2023, 04:45 PM
#8
Oh yes, i was playing it nonstop, and arma did an extrem good job in developing this game where others should just learn from them. On the apex they fixes alot of bugs and made the gameplay way more smoother. Opening the new arsenal was amazing. And the main thing that arma did always well is that its realistic "
W
willowengstrom
03-24-2023, 04:45 PM #8

Oh yes, i was playing it nonstop, and arma did an extrem good job in developing this game where others should just learn from them. On the apex they fixes alot of bugs and made the gameplay way more smoother. Opening the new arsenal was amazing. And the main thing that arma did always well is that its realistic "

D
DatNastySalad
Junior Member
47
03-31-2023, 11:21 PM
#9
Some players in my area tried the initial four missions of the coop campaign with a few modifications, and it was quite enjoyable. We observed Sandy Bridge PCs achieving 15-45 frames per second, mostly around the 30s range, while top-end systems (Skylake 6700k with 1080) reached 45-80 FPS, mostly around 60. This varies depending on your location on the map. Tanoa’s updated version runs about 30% slower than the original Altis version. I recorded a video from a week ago during testing, and it seems no significant improvements have been made recently. Let’s avoid getting excited about perfect optimization—there’s still no hardware that consistently hits 60 FPS. The best you can get for Arma 3 is around 45+, and most mid-range setups often fall below 30 FPS, sometimes even under 15. While the visuals look decent from a static perspective, the new map suffers from noticeable popping issues, especially in the jungle areas where LOD changes around 5 meters away. The overall experience feels less solid, and despite the fun we had in the coop, the game still struggles with performance and bugs compared to its previous versions. As someone who plays Arma for years, we can understand the frustrations, but this isn’t a fix; it’s just another example of the game’s ongoing challenges.
D
DatNastySalad
03-31-2023, 11:21 PM #9

Some players in my area tried the initial four missions of the coop campaign with a few modifications, and it was quite enjoyable. We observed Sandy Bridge PCs achieving 15-45 frames per second, mostly around the 30s range, while top-end systems (Skylake 6700k with 1080) reached 45-80 FPS, mostly around 60. This varies depending on your location on the map. Tanoa’s updated version runs about 30% slower than the original Altis version. I recorded a video from a week ago during testing, and it seems no significant improvements have been made recently. Let’s avoid getting excited about perfect optimization—there’s still no hardware that consistently hits 60 FPS. The best you can get for Arma 3 is around 45+, and most mid-range setups often fall below 30 FPS, sometimes even under 15. While the visuals look decent from a static perspective, the new map suffers from noticeable popping issues, especially in the jungle areas where LOD changes around 5 meters away. The overall experience feels less solid, and despite the fun we had in the coop, the game still struggles with performance and bugs compared to its previous versions. As someone who plays Arma for years, we can understand the frustrations, but this isn’t a fix; it’s just another example of the game’s ongoing challenges.