Are you facing challenges because of your equipment?
Are you facing challenges because of your equipment?
I know it is a bit of a odd question because 80-149FPS is above 60, but I am still asking. I have an old AMD system that has been broken for like 3 months now and am going to fix it ASAP now I have spare cash... Damn Christmas But I have heard and seen written that 200-300fps is competitively superior for CS. As of the time my PC broke I was DMG and winning a lot of games in a row so was close to LE I suspect. Now i will have no rank and am at a deficit of 3 months. From my starting rank of Silver 3 this took me 7 months and I solo Q'd 99% of it.
It could help if the frame rate was around 200–300 frames per second. Most displays can't actually reach that speed, but it’s still useful for smoother visuals. The current standard is about 144 fps, though newer tech might push beyond that.
gaming screens can only show 144 frames per second, so anything higher is just wasted effort. I own one myself and can say that 80 FPS feels much smoother than 60 FPS, while 100 FPS is only slightly smoother than 80. Above 100 FPS you usually don’t notice the difference.
They say a higher frame rate than the refresh rate appears better because they turned off V-Sync, which cuts down input lag. This makes the visuals seem smoother. Edited December 5, 2015 by Godlygamer23
My friend is a top performer in his field. He uses a 60Hz display and works around 70 frames per second.
Thanks for the feedback! Your help really made a difference. :-)
He who said otherwise doesn't understand the matter. Plus, you'd have to be an expert to truly benefit from a 120hz display. Even then, it usually doesn't impact your gameplay much.
Eliminate Vsync for a snappier experience, it really reduces input lag. Using a 60Hz monitor helped me get the best performance in games like BF4—capping the frame rate to 65FPS with Rivatuner and turning off Vsync made things smoother compared to letting it run at 80 or 90FPS.