F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Are these temps normal?

Are these temps normal?

Are these temps normal?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
F
FatihTerim
Member
184
04-02-2016, 11:05 AM
#1
I've boosted my i5-4690k to 4.4 Ghz @1.27V. During stress tests, the temperature fluctuated a lot, similar to how my emotions shift while playing League of Legends.
I'll share a screenshot below—was this typical?
F
FatihTerim
04-02-2016, 11:05 AM #1

I've boosted my i5-4690k to 4.4 Ghz @1.27V. During stress tests, the temperature fluctuated a lot, similar to how my emotions shift while playing League of Legends.
I'll share a screenshot below—was this typical?

X
x_roow_x
Junior Member
13
04-02-2016, 12:15 PM
#2
Deniedstingray:
Faux_Grey:
darkguset:
Yeap, perfectly normal! Nothing to worry about.
1.27 was leading to crashes during load in games.
I had to revert it back to 1.3 for now. Appreciate the assistance!
Have you considered lowering the Cache/ringbus ratio?
With a Cache/ringbus ratio of 3.5Ghz, I can reach significantly lower temps and higher core overclocking.
To be honest, this is my first overclock attempt and I’m not sure what the settings are doing. What adjustments should I make?
The cache/ringbus (named differently depending on the board) refers to the clock speed your CPU uses to access its local memory.
When you increase the core frequency, in certain situations it can automatically overclock the cache...
X
x_roow_x
04-02-2016, 12:15 PM #2

Deniedstingray:
Faux_Grey:
darkguset:
Yeap, perfectly normal! Nothing to worry about.
1.27 was leading to crashes during load in games.
I had to revert it back to 1.3 for now. Appreciate the assistance!
Have you considered lowering the Cache/ringbus ratio?
With a Cache/ringbus ratio of 3.5Ghz, I can reach significantly lower temps and higher core overclocking.
To be honest, this is my first overclock attempt and I’m not sure what the settings are doing. What adjustments should I make?
The cache/ringbus (named differently depending on the board) refers to the clock speed your CPU uses to access its local memory.
When you increase the core frequency, in certain situations it can automatically overclock the cache...

A
audi497mks
Senior Member
601
04-02-2016, 08:19 PM
#3
Absolutely, everything is fine!
A
audi497mks
04-02-2016, 08:19 PM #3

Absolutely, everything is fine!

I
i0cean
Member
218
04-02-2016, 11:08 PM
#4
DarkGuest:
Yeah, that's completely fine! No need to be concerned.
1.27 was leading to crashes when loading games.
I had to revert it back to version 1.3 temporarily. Appreciate the assistance!
I
i0cean
04-02-2016, 11:08 PM #4

DarkGuest:
Yeah, that's completely fine! No need to be concerned.
1.27 was leading to crashes when loading games.
I had to revert it back to version 1.3 temporarily. Appreciate the assistance!

K
kk900314
Junior Member
29
04-09-2016, 05:13 PM
#5
No problem, buddy. It seems 1.3V is a great balance for keeping your CPU steady and cool without any issues.
K
kk900314
04-09-2016, 05:13 PM #5

No problem, buddy. It seems 1.3V is a great balance for keeping your CPU steady and cool without any issues.

J
Jaws_01
Member
60
04-14-2016, 05:16 PM
#6
Looks good to me, got my 4690K on 1.29v 4.5Ghz.
What CPU cooler are you using?
Any temps under 75 degrees max load should be okay.
With my Corsair H80iGT cooler, my max temp is 72.
J
Jaws_01
04-14-2016, 05:16 PM #6

Looks good to me, got my 4690K on 1.29v 4.5Ghz.
What CPU cooler are you using?
Any temps under 75 degrees max load should be okay.
With my Corsair H80iGT cooler, my max temp is 72.

F
FaZe_RAIN69
Junior Member
15
04-14-2016, 07:03 PM
#7
Deniedstingray :
darkguset :
Yes, everything is fine! No need to be concerned.
1.27 was leading to crashes during load in games.
I had to revert it back to 1.3 temporarily. Appreciate the advice!
Have you considered lowering the Cache/ringbus ratio?
With a Cache/ringbus ratio of 3.5Ghz, I can reach much cooler temps and higher core overclocking.
F
FaZe_RAIN69
04-14-2016, 07:03 PM #7

Deniedstingray :
darkguset :
Yes, everything is fine! No need to be concerned.
1.27 was leading to crashes during load in games.
I had to revert it back to 1.3 temporarily. Appreciate the advice!
Have you considered lowering the Cache/ringbus ratio?
With a Cache/ringbus ratio of 3.5Ghz, I can reach much cooler temps and higher core overclocking.

C
Chiller9592
Senior Member
670
04-16-2016, 09:20 AM
#8
Deniedstingray:
darkguset :
Yeap, perfectly normal! Nothing to worry about.
1.27 was leading to crashes during load in games.
I had to revert it back to 1.3 for now. Thanks for the assistance!
Have you considered lowering the Cache/ringbus ratio?
With a Cache/ringbus ratio of 3.5Ghz, I can reach much lower temperatures and higher core overclocking.
To be honest, this is my first overclock attempt and I’m not sure what the settings are doing. What adjustments should I make?
C
Chiller9592
04-16-2016, 09:20 AM #8

Deniedstingray:
darkguset :
Yeap, perfectly normal! Nothing to worry about.
1.27 was leading to crashes during load in games.
I had to revert it back to 1.3 for now. Thanks for the assistance!
Have you considered lowering the Cache/ringbus ratio?
With a Cache/ringbus ratio of 3.5Ghz, I can reach much lower temperatures and higher core overclocking.
To be honest, this is my first overclock attempt and I’m not sure what the settings are doing. What adjustments should I make?

D
DaRabbit
Junior Member
39
05-03-2016, 04:14 PM
#9
I'm using a 212 EVO with a maximum temperature of 71, and I believe it's holding steady at 1.29V now.
D
DaRabbit
05-03-2016, 04:14 PM #9

I'm using a 212 EVO with a maximum temperature of 71, and I believe it's holding steady at 1.29V now.

T
TheWolfGrave
Member
62
05-05-2016, 09:49 AM
#10
Deniedstingray:
Faux_Grey:
darkguset :
Yeap, perfectly normal! Nothing to worry about.
1.27 was leading to crashes during load in games.
I had to revert it back to 1.3 for now. Appreciate the assistance!
Have you considered lowering the Cache/ringbus ratio?
With a Cache/ringbus ratio of 3.5Ghz, I can reach significantly lower temps and higher core overclocking.
To be honest, this is my first overclock attempt and I’m not sure what the settings are doing. What adjustments should I make?
The cache/ringbus—different names on different boards—is essentially the clock speed your CPU uses to access its local memory.
When you increase the core frequency, sometimes it automatically boosts the cache as well. In some scenarios, the cache becomes the source of instability first, not the core.
Benchmarks indicate that a ratio between 3.5Ghz and 4.5Ghz has minimal impact on games or similar applications for our processors (just remember where I found this—search Google).
It’s generally advised to fix the Cache ratio at 35x (3.5Ghz) and keep the CACHE voltage set to Auto.
Using this approach tends to stabilize the cache while allowing the core to overclock further, since you’re not constrained by cache stability.
T
TheWolfGrave
05-05-2016, 09:49 AM #10

Deniedstingray:
Faux_Grey:
darkguset :
Yeap, perfectly normal! Nothing to worry about.
1.27 was leading to crashes during load in games.
I had to revert it back to 1.3 for now. Appreciate the assistance!
Have you considered lowering the Cache/ringbus ratio?
With a Cache/ringbus ratio of 3.5Ghz, I can reach significantly lower temps and higher core overclocking.
To be honest, this is my first overclock attempt and I’m not sure what the settings are doing. What adjustments should I make?
The cache/ringbus—different names on different boards—is essentially the clock speed your CPU uses to access its local memory.
When you increase the core frequency, sometimes it automatically boosts the cache as well. In some scenarios, the cache becomes the source of instability first, not the core.
Benchmarks indicate that a ratio between 3.5Ghz and 4.5Ghz has minimal impact on games or similar applications for our processors (just remember where I found this—search Google).
It’s generally advised to fix the Cache ratio at 35x (3.5Ghz) and keep the CACHE voltage set to Auto.
Using this approach tends to stabilize the cache while allowing the core to overclock further, since you’re not constrained by cache stability.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next