F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Another instance of swapping parts once the reputation is set?

Another instance of swapping parts once the reputation is set?

Another instance of swapping parts once the reputation is set?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
F
favio31
Junior Member
12
06-28-2023, 07:09 PM
#1
Alfa Network (alfa.com.tw) is known for manufacturing premium network equipment, with several items favored by Linux enthusiasts and recommended for Kali Linux testing, especially for WiFi security assessments. Their products are widely discussed online, and their AWUS036NHA model is particularly popular among users. This device features the well-known Atheros AR9271 Wi-Fi chip. I possess two units, one with the original seal and another with German revision. Upon inspection, both did not meet the advertised performance claims, prompting me to examine a third ALFA USB Wi-Fi adapter—a now end-of-life AWUS036NH model equipped with the RALINK RT3070 Wi-Fi chip. The findings indicate that neither adapter contains the original chip as advertised. For the AWUS036NHA models, both have the AR9271L chip (low-cost variant labeled L). The AWUS036NH, however, uses the RT3070L. Based on naming conventions, low-cost or low-power variants are likely candidates. Images: overview shows the NHA should display an AAR9271, whereas the table confirms: ALFA AWUS036NH = AtherosAR9271L. ALFA AWUS036NHA = AtherosAR9271L. Sources: product pages on Alfa.com.tw (and technical details) - AWUS036NH - AWUS036NHA further information available on techinfodepot - Atheros_AR9271 - ALFA_Network_AWUS036NHA - ALFA_Network_AWUS036NH Edited August 4, 2021 by Herr.Snatzer (note: typo)
F
favio31
06-28-2023, 07:09 PM #1

Alfa Network (alfa.com.tw) is known for manufacturing premium network equipment, with several items favored by Linux enthusiasts and recommended for Kali Linux testing, especially for WiFi security assessments. Their products are widely discussed online, and their AWUS036NHA model is particularly popular among users. This device features the well-known Atheros AR9271 Wi-Fi chip. I possess two units, one with the original seal and another with German revision. Upon inspection, both did not meet the advertised performance claims, prompting me to examine a third ALFA USB Wi-Fi adapter—a now end-of-life AWUS036NH model equipped with the RALINK RT3070 Wi-Fi chip. The findings indicate that neither adapter contains the original chip as advertised. For the AWUS036NHA models, both have the AR9271L chip (low-cost variant labeled L). The AWUS036NH, however, uses the RT3070L. Based on naming conventions, low-cost or low-power variants are likely candidates. Images: overview shows the NHA should display an AAR9271, whereas the table confirms: ALFA AWUS036NH = AtherosAR9271L. ALFA AWUS036NHA = AtherosAR9271L. Sources: product pages on Alfa.com.tw (and technical details) - AWUS036NH - AWUS036NHA further information available on techinfodepot - Atheros_AR9271 - ALFA_Network_AWUS036NHA - ALFA_Network_AWUS036NH Edited August 4, 2021 by Herr.Snatzer (note: typo)

C
cocochip50
Member
193
06-28-2023, 08:11 PM
#2
I understand you're asking about the production timeline, possibly influenced by current supply challenges.
C
cocochip50
06-28-2023, 08:11 PM #2

I understand you're asking about the production timeline, possibly influenced by current supply challenges.

R
64
07-15-2023, 05:47 PM
#3
They continue to offer a lower-priced alternative while maintaining the same price as the original hardware.
R
RorroFuture420
07-15-2023, 05:47 PM #3

They continue to offer a lower-priced alternative while maintaining the same price as the original hardware.

A
Alan4041
Member
210
07-15-2023, 09:03 PM
#4
I fully understand. I wasn’t aiming to please anyone, just to grasp the reasoning behind it beyond just causing trouble for the customer.
A
Alan4041
07-15-2023, 09:03 PM #4

I fully understand. I wasn’t aiming to please anyone, just to grasp the reasoning behind it beyond just causing trouble for the customer.

G
GameBoosh
Senior Member
470
07-16-2023, 12:33 AM
#5
Is it really called Costumer overseas? I keep seeing it all the time. It seems like a frequent mistake. In the U.S., a costumer is a real job in theater productions, TV, or film. Customers are the ones who purchase goods.
G
GameBoosh
07-16-2023, 12:33 AM #5

Is it really called Costumer overseas? I keep seeing it all the time. It seems like a frequent mistake. In the U.S., a costumer is a real job in theater productions, TV, or film. Customers are the ones who purchase goods.

Z
Zamorak_boys
Junior Member
43
07-21-2023, 08:14 AM
#6
In strict English terms, it refers to a consumer or customer. I believe it comes from an unintended combination of the words.
Z
Zamorak_boys
07-21-2023, 08:14 AM #6

In strict English terms, it refers to a consumer or customer. I believe it comes from an unintended combination of the words.

M
Mister1Craft
Junior Member
2
07-21-2023, 01:32 PM
#7
Certainly, the shift isn't just about turning buyers into customers.
M
Mister1Craft
07-21-2023, 01:32 PM #7

Certainly, the shift isn't just about turning buyers into customers.

C
Captin_sponge
Member
175
07-21-2023, 02:43 PM
#8
It's a simple typo. Most learners pick up English by mimicking sounds similar to many Germanic languages, where you write what you hear. The "CU" in Customer isn't a typical sound, so we often render it as an "O," which leads to confusion. Plus, since "Costumer" is a real word and spellcheck doesn't flag it, the error keeps happening.
C
Captin_sponge
07-21-2023, 02:43 PM #8

It's a simple typo. Most learners pick up English by mimicking sounds similar to many Germanic languages, where you write what you hear. The "CU" in Customer isn't a typical sound, so we often render it as an "O," which leads to confusion. Plus, since "Costumer" is a real word and spellcheck doesn't flag it, the error keeps happening.

A
asianxxnation
Junior Member
18
07-26-2023, 05:32 PM
#9
I sent an email to Alpha Networks regarding this matter. Since two out of three have their seals, they appear authentic. I also reached out to the store where I purchased the three units—located in the Netherlands (https://wifihouse.nl/), a dedicated Wi-Fi shop. They informed me they are the only Alpha Network location accessible from the German distribution hub there. I requested they update their website images and specifications so customers are clearly informed about what they receive. So far, they haven’t responded... ) back to my original email. No reply, not even an automated message from a bot. If nothing comes within a week, I’ll try alternative contact points within the company, this time using general customer support.

Additionally, I couldn’t locate any documentation explaining what distinguishes an L version from an L version. Some sources mention the L version clearly, but no detailed specs are available for comparison. For the Ralink model, it seems significant changes exist, possibly due to the Mediakick takeover of the company, which now holds all Ralink product documentation. I suspect this could explain why certain features differ even when other products use the non-L version.

In terms of the AWUSB036NH (Ralink), it’s promoted as a 2000mW high-power Wi-Fi adapter. However, the USB device specs show only 450mA maximum. It’s unclear how it achieves 2000mA over a USB 2.0 connection, especially since my fast-charging port only supports up to 1500mA.

Lastly, I discovered that the Ralink model is advertised with specific technical details. If anyone owns a unit or knows someone who does, could you share your experience? Also, note that the AWUSB036NH is listed as a 802.11 n WLAN adapter with serial number 1.0, and the manufacturer is Ralink.
A
asianxxnation
07-26-2023, 05:32 PM #9

I sent an email to Alpha Networks regarding this matter. Since two out of three have their seals, they appear authentic. I also reached out to the store where I purchased the three units—located in the Netherlands (https://wifihouse.nl/), a dedicated Wi-Fi shop. They informed me they are the only Alpha Network location accessible from the German distribution hub there. I requested they update their website images and specifications so customers are clearly informed about what they receive. So far, they haven’t responded... ) back to my original email. No reply, not even an automated message from a bot. If nothing comes within a week, I’ll try alternative contact points within the company, this time using general customer support.

Additionally, I couldn’t locate any documentation explaining what distinguishes an L version from an L version. Some sources mention the L version clearly, but no detailed specs are available for comparison. For the Ralink model, it seems significant changes exist, possibly due to the Mediakick takeover of the company, which now holds all Ralink product documentation. I suspect this could explain why certain features differ even when other products use the non-L version.

In terms of the AWUSB036NH (Ralink), it’s promoted as a 2000mW high-power Wi-Fi adapter. However, the USB device specs show only 450mA maximum. It’s unclear how it achieves 2000mA over a USB 2.0 connection, especially since my fast-charging port only supports up to 1500mA.

Lastly, I discovered that the Ralink model is advertised with specific technical details. If anyone owns a unit or knows someone who does, could you share your experience? Also, note that the AWUSB036NH is listed as a 802.11 n WLAN adapter with serial number 1.0, and the manufacturer is Ralink.

3
3gilad3
Senior Member
735
07-27-2023, 02:08 AM
#10
I never understood the advertised 2000mW anyway, AFAIK there is no country where that would be legal to use. As for "how do they push 2W from USB 2.0" the simple answer I suspect is, they don't. It probably refers to ERP (Effective Radiated Power) which a quick Googling suggests that can be 3-6 times the actual input power. So they're basically saying you can achieve 2W ERP with a high-gain directional antenna, not really anything to brag about. Very disturbing to see them using Ralink, AFAIK they are the absolute bargain basement, maybe slightly better or equal to Realtek.
3
3gilad3
07-27-2023, 02:08 AM #10

I never understood the advertised 2000mW anyway, AFAIK there is no country where that would be legal to use. As for "how do they push 2W from USB 2.0" the simple answer I suspect is, they don't. It probably refers to ERP (Effective Radiated Power) which a quick Googling suggests that can be 3-6 times the actual input power. So they're basically saying you can achieve 2W ERP with a high-gain directional antenna, not really anything to brag about. Very disturbing to see them using Ralink, AFAIK they are the absolute bargain basement, maybe slightly better or equal to Realtek.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next