F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Ancient operating systems

Ancient operating systems

Ancient operating systems

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
T
THD_ImLuqa
Junior Member
7
05-28-2016, 06:17 PM
#11
Apple 2, Atari machine, Unix originated around the 1920s? Edit: 1970s I believed an operating system existed back then—maybe I had a recent head injury...
T
THD_ImLuqa
05-28-2016, 06:17 PM #11

Apple 2, Atari machine, Unix originated around the 1920s? Edit: 1970s I believed an operating system existed back then—maybe I had a recent head injury...

C
Charlie_1898
Junior Member
41
06-01-2016, 05:52 AM
#12
A birthday card with a musical message packs more processing strength than the Allied forces during World War II. [citation needed] It’s unlikely any operating systems existed in the 1920s.
C
Charlie_1898
06-01-2016, 05:52 AM #12

A birthday card with a musical message packs more processing strength than the Allied forces during World War II. [citation needed] It’s unlikely any operating systems existed in the 1920s.

J
Jomppaboy
Member
192
06-02-2016, 06:02 AM
#13
Discussing the axis means examining its role or position in the context.
J
Jomppaboy
06-02-2016, 06:02 AM #13

Discussing the axis means examining its role or position in the context.

T
TheGamingWiz
Member
185
06-02-2016, 07:34 AM
#14
I doubt it was any different, unless you wanna talk about conspiracy theories. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_system#History
T
TheGamingWiz
06-02-2016, 07:34 AM #14

I doubt it was any different, unless you wanna talk about conspiracy theories. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_system#History

S
sharlene1125
Member
70
06-10-2016, 05:59 AM
#15
Hey, just joking around.
S
sharlene1125
06-10-2016, 05:59 AM #15

Hey, just joking around.

M
MissFluffy
Member
130
06-10-2016, 12:46 PM
#16
Windows 3.0 fails to launch and crashes; version 3.1 works with some chance. It mentions a PageOverCommit error in System.INI being too large, but the real issue is that the setting isn’t present in My system.ini. Including it shouldn’t fix the problem.
M
MissFluffy
06-10-2016, 12:46 PM #16

Windows 3.0 fails to launch and crashes; version 3.1 works with some chance. It mentions a PageOverCommit error in System.INI being too large, but the real issue is that the setting isn’t present in My system.ini. Including it shouldn’t fix the problem.

S
SWAGtheUNICORN
Junior Member
7
06-16-2016, 11:32 PM
#17
I've tested Windows 98 on that laptop a while back... it ran fine once, but drivers didn't work. Win95 would freeze during startup, and I recall tweaking system.ini to trigger the error. Not enough RAM meant Windows wouldn't launch properly. It seems the original DOS from 1995 might have been based on DOS622, which could explain some issues. There were over 20 replies suggesting using DosBox or emulators in other threads. My current experiments include "The MSDOS 5.00 Experiment" and "The MSDOS 6.22 Experiment," both of which failed. I managed to boot from an emulated floppy, but the FAT partition detection caused problems. Now I know why both versions didn't work. Before giving up, I tried installing an HDD, but that also failed after an SSD attempt. Emulating can feel convincing, yet it's far from real. Installing DOS 6.22 and Windows 3.1 isn't fun anymore—especially since you can easily search for solutions online.
S
SWAGtheUNICORN
06-16-2016, 11:32 PM #17

I've tested Windows 98 on that laptop a while back... it ran fine once, but drivers didn't work. Win95 would freeze during startup, and I recall tweaking system.ini to trigger the error. Not enough RAM meant Windows wouldn't launch properly. It seems the original DOS from 1995 might have been based on DOS622, which could explain some issues. There were over 20 replies suggesting using DosBox or emulators in other threads. My current experiments include "The MSDOS 5.00 Experiment" and "The MSDOS 6.22 Experiment," both of which failed. I managed to boot from an emulated floppy, but the FAT partition detection caused problems. Now I know why both versions didn't work. Before giving up, I tried installing an HDD, but that also failed after an SSD attempt. Emulating can feel convincing, yet it's far from real. Installing DOS 6.22 and Windows 3.1 isn't fun anymore—especially since you can easily search for solutions online.

I
iRiffleZ
Junior Member
47
06-17-2016, 12:18 AM
#18
Windows 3.1 didn't require a product key—it was already considered outdated. If it's not permitted, why can we still seek assistance and exchange links for components?
I
iRiffleZ
06-17-2016, 12:18 AM #18

Windows 3.1 didn't require a product key—it was already considered outdated. If it's not permitted, why can we still seek assistance and exchange links for components?

D
Dirtroads
Junior Member
5
06-18-2016, 05:46 PM
#19
Ada Lovelace contributed to early computing by writing the first computer programs in the 1800s. It’s possible they (along with Charles Babbage) had a sort of operating system, though it never ran on a machine. The programs were originally on paper. I suggest exploring Ada Lovelace’s work or watching YouTube videos and documentaries about her. Fascinating material!
D
Dirtroads
06-18-2016, 05:46 PM #19

Ada Lovelace contributed to early computing by writing the first computer programs in the 1800s. It’s possible they (along with Charles Babbage) had a sort of operating system, though it never ran on a machine. The programs were originally on paper. I suggest exploring Ada Lovelace’s work or watching YouTube videos and documentaries about her. Fascinating material!

I
I_Rock114
Junior Member
3
06-19-2016, 12:10 AM
#20
This concern about product keys isn't related to whether something is piracy or not. Abandonware still constitutes piracy... Seeking assistance is completely different from sharing links to proprietary software. From a technical standpoint, I think it falls into a gray area even for having this discussion here (I just looked at the community guidelines). Oh wait, no—it's clear now. We all have legal methods to get old operating systems, right? Regardless, I definitely wouldn't promote any abandoned software, no matter how outdated it is. I prefer using Google and other straightforward sources instead of pushing boundaries.
I
I_Rock114
06-19-2016, 12:10 AM #20

This concern about product keys isn't related to whether something is piracy or not. Abandonware still constitutes piracy... Seeking assistance is completely different from sharing links to proprietary software. From a technical standpoint, I think it falls into a gray area even for having this discussion here (I just looked at the community guidelines). Oh wait, no—it's clear now. We all have legal methods to get old operating systems, right? Regardless, I definitely wouldn't promote any abandoned software, no matter how outdated it is. I prefer using Google and other straightforward sources instead of pushing boundaries.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next