F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems AMD GPU Renderer in CINEMA 4D

AMD GPU Renderer in CINEMA 4D

AMD GPU Renderer in CINEMA 4D

G
GreenLightFabi
Senior Member
696
07-23-2016, 04:21 PM
#1
I'm looking for third-party Cinema 4D plugins that support GPU rendering using AMD GPUs. The ones I've seen only work with CUDA, which is frustrating since CPU rendering is extremely slow—like 1 hour 20 minutes for an 8-second clip on a 4790k.
G
GreenLightFabi
07-23-2016, 04:21 PM #1

I'm looking for third-party Cinema 4D plugins that support GPU rendering using AMD GPUs. The ones I've seen only work with CUDA, which is frustrating since CPU rendering is extremely slow—like 1 hour 20 minutes for an 8-second clip on a 4790k.

P
Pekoni
Junior Member
24
07-26-2016, 12:19 PM
#2
There are no OpenCL renderers available for Cinema 4D.
P
Pekoni
07-26-2016, 12:19 PM #2

There are no OpenCL renderers available for Cinema 4D.

B
Blureux
Posting Freak
797
07-26-2016, 08:38 PM
#3
Nvidia stands out for animation and 3D modeling or rendering tasks.
B
Blureux
07-26-2016, 08:38 PM #3

Nvidia stands out for animation and 3D modeling or rendering tasks.

L
loltribo
Posting Freak
870
07-26-2016, 09:43 PM
#4
It's feasible if the system backs OpenCL.
L
loltribo
07-26-2016, 09:43 PM #4

It's feasible if the system backs OpenCL.

P
150
07-28-2016, 05:08 AM
#5
No, octane 3 is not available yet.
P
petereater1003
07-28-2016, 05:08 AM #5

No, octane 3 is not available yet.

O
Orangenschale
Junior Member
7
07-28-2016, 08:04 AM
#6
Typically programs rely on CUDA, meaning all machines have NVIDIA GPUs. Since NVIDIA performs poorly with OpenCL, adding OpenCL support isn't necessary. The software costs tens of thousands for a single license. If you can pay, you can invest in a Quad-core processor.
O
Orangenschale
07-28-2016, 08:04 AM #6

Typically programs rely on CUDA, meaning all machines have NVIDIA GPUs. Since NVIDIA performs poorly with OpenCL, adding OpenCL support isn't necessary. The software costs tens of thousands for a single license. If you can pay, you can invest in a Quad-core processor.

A
ArisV
Member
129
07-28-2016, 03:27 PM
#7
Only a few programs are exclusive to CUDA. Also, AMD's processing power is significantly superior to Nvidia's—like the 290X easily outperforming a 980 Ti in computation so much it becomes impressive.
A
ArisV
07-28-2016, 03:27 PM #7

Only a few programs are exclusive to CUDA. Also, AMD's processing power is significantly superior to Nvidia's—like the 290X easily outperforming a 980 Ti in computation so much it becomes impressive.

F
FromTheJakob
Junior Member
2
07-31-2016, 03:33 PM
#8
Cuda was developed initially and promoted by Nvidia to be used in applications. Nvidia also produced renders such as iray, which are exclusive to Cuda. Cuda tends to be more straightforward for programming than OpenCL, although OpenCL can be quicker when implemented properly. Nvidia possesses significantly greater financial resources compared to AMD, enabling them to develop rendering software more extensively. They also dominate the professional graphics market.
F
FromTheJakob
07-31-2016, 03:33 PM #8

Cuda was developed initially and promoted by Nvidia to be used in applications. Nvidia also produced renders such as iray, which are exclusive to Cuda. Cuda tends to be more straightforward for programming than OpenCL, although OpenCL can be quicker when implemented properly. Nvidia possesses significantly greater financial resources compared to AMD, enabling them to develop rendering software more extensively. They also dominate the professional graphics market.

A
amberleenie
Member
174
08-05-2016, 04:22 AM
#9
Nvidia doesn't control the entire market because Maxwell isn't nearly as powerful as Kepler or Fermi. CUDA, their exclusive technology, isn't the only option and OpenCL support makes it seem less valuable. For instance, Sony Vegas users relying on CUDA get significantly less performance compared to OpenCL users. In about 75% of cases, both platforms work well with only a few exceptions.
A
amberleenie
08-05-2016, 04:22 AM #9

Nvidia doesn't control the entire market because Maxwell isn't nearly as powerful as Kepler or Fermi. CUDA, their exclusive technology, isn't the only option and OpenCL support makes it seem less valuable. For instance, Sony Vegas users relying on CUDA get significantly less performance compared to OpenCL users. In about 75% of cases, both platforms work well with only a few exceptions.