AMD FX-8320 3.5GHz (Eight-Core)
AMD FX-8320 3.5GHz (Eight-Core)
"EVGA 600 WATT 80 Plus Power Supply"
I don't know why everyone is so squeamish, you're at 225w tdp for your cpu/gpu so its got plenty of wattage, and I've personally rocked that psu with a fx-8320 @ 4.2gz and a moderate oc on a gtx 760, and as far as headroom/durability it is taking in the teeth from my new build and running with no stability issues at around 545w (according to the psu calc) while I wait for my 750w to show up..
Overhead wattage isn't the sole reason against overclocking. The quality of the PSU is also important to consider. If it lacks stability, provides inconsistent power, or lacks safety features, overclocking isn't advised. Wattage isn't the only aspect that influences overclocking capability on a PSU.
The EVGA 600 watt power supply with 80 Plus certification is a solid choice. Many people hesitate because it delivers 225 watts, but I've used it with a 4.2gz FX-8320 and a moderate overclock on my GTX 760 without any stability problems. Around 545 watts is enough for my setup, and the build quality and durability are impressive. The real concern isn<|pad|>'s not having the maximum output, but rather the reliability and performance of the power supply itself.
It might not be the ideal choice, but it’s still a decent option for PSU's.
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/EVGA/600B/11.html
Advantages:
Cost-effective
Delivers full power at 46°C
Excellent ripple suppression compared to the 500B I tested
Stable voltage regulation at 5V
More silent operation than the 500B
Reduced inrush current
Slim profile
Disadvantages:
Lacks four PCIe connectors; additional peripherals would be nice
Not Haswell compatible (per Intel’s tests)
Short lifespan before holding capability
Average rating 8.3
If you check the 600B, it closely resembles its smaller sibling, the 500B, sharing the same platform and connectors, with only a slight power difference of about 100W. Yet the 600B outperformed the 500B due to superior ripple suppression, quieter performance, and nearly identical voltage regulation and stability. Although some changes were made to achieve these improvements, the 600B still failed Intel’s Haswell testing standards. It’s worth mentioning that the latter tests were conducted under extreme conditions, and EVGA confirmed they evaluated both 500B and 600B with Haswell chips, which performed consistently well. Nonetheless, I must rely on Intel’s guidelines, even if they seem unrealistic for standard PSUs, and to be honest, the specs here are challenging to achieve with group-regulated power supplies, especially for these Bronze models.
Just because it's a good entry-level price doesn't mean it's suited for overclocking. You can definitely manage it. I successfully reached 4.4GHz stability on my FX6100 using a CM GX 750, though the power supply wasn't ideal. It's definitely possible—just be aware you're taking a chance.
This mobile or CPU can be purchased for $225, but the main concern is how to best use your money. The $100 could go toward a decent mid-range power supply, which would help protect the $225 investment. I suggest keeping the PSU and using the remaining funds for additional RAM or a Samsung Evo, since upgrading the motherboard would be even more costly.