F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop AMD FX 4300 is a processor model from AMD.

AMD FX 4300 is a processor model from AMD.

AMD FX 4300 is a processor model from AMD.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
B
Berry_Burst
Member
60
07-07-2016, 01:44 AM
#1
The AMD FX 4300 is designed for high-performance use, which is why it requires more robust cooling compared to many Intel CPUs. Your friend likely recommended a better cooler because the FX tends to generate more heat under load, making effective cooling essential for stability and longevity.
B
Berry_Burst
07-07-2016, 01:44 AM #1

The AMD FX 4300 is designed for high-performance use, which is why it requires more robust cooling compared to many Intel CPUs. Your friend likely recommended a better cooler because the FX tends to generate more heat under load, making effective cooling essential for stability and longevity.

J
jojobobo04
Member
170
07-12-2016, 02:21 PM
#2
It's challenging to give a clear response. This CPU is quite outdated, which makes it slow compared to modern processors, making it unsuitable from a performance standpoint. When it first came out, it was also slower than Intel chips but offered better value for money. If you had a tight budget, it could have been a solid choice. Upgrading the cooler wouldn't significantly boost performance unless overheating was an issue. Since it uses the AM3 socket, upgrading might be possible, but AM3 chips remain relatively costly for the performance gain they provide, so it's not a worthwhile investment.
J
jojobobo04
07-12-2016, 02:21 PM #2

It's challenging to give a clear response. This CPU is quite outdated, which makes it slow compared to modern processors, making it unsuitable from a performance standpoint. When it first came out, it was also slower than Intel chips but offered better value for money. If you had a tight budget, it could have been a solid choice. Upgrading the cooler wouldn't significantly boost performance unless overheating was an issue. Since it uses the AM3 socket, upgrading might be possible, but AM3 chips remain relatively costly for the performance gain they provide, so it's not a worthwhile investment.

G
gogofrgl1234
Senior Member
718
07-14-2016, 03:17 AM
#3
Held an FX-4100, it was in rough shape. Still, the FX-4300 should work with most average coolers; it doesn’t pack a powerful chip, let alone the eight cores.
G
gogofrgl1234
07-14-2016, 03:17 AM #3

Held an FX-4100, it was in rough shape. Still, the FX-4300 should work with most average coolers; it doesn’t pack a powerful chip, let alone the eight cores.

U
UnderZero17
Member
124
07-20-2016, 04:34 PM
#4
FX 4300 is quite outdated. It's been ten years. Avoid spending money on it and opt for a current Ryzen 3 3100 instead.
U
UnderZero17
07-20-2016, 04:34 PM #4

FX 4300 is quite outdated. It's been ten years. Avoid spending money on it and opt for a current Ryzen 3 3100 instead.

Z
Zerstouerneun
Member
186
07-20-2016, 05:09 PM
#5
The FX lineup struggled with poor performance because of its limited cache relative to a high core count. During that period, games were heavily optimized for multiple cores, and its IPC lagged behind Intel significantly. Back then, I could achieve solid results with a heavily overclocked FX 8450, but now it barely functions.
Z
Zerstouerneun
07-20-2016, 05:09 PM #5

The FX lineup struggled with poor performance because of its limited cache relative to a high core count. During that period, games were heavily optimized for multiple cores, and its IPC lagged behind Intel significantly. Back then, I could achieve solid results with a heavily overclocked FX 8450, but now it barely functions.

E
emsbabygirl
Member
52
07-22-2016, 10:46 AM
#6
Sure, you'd also need to replace the motherboard and RAM. Purchasing a 50$ Ryzen 1200 or a 3000g motherboard with a 50-60$ A320 chipset and 8-16 GB DDR4 memory would cost about 30$. That gives you a solid upgrade for around $150.
E
emsbabygirl
07-22-2016, 10:46 AM #6

Sure, you'd also need to replace the motherboard and RAM. Purchasing a 50$ Ryzen 1200 or a 3000g motherboard with a 50-60$ A320 chipset and 8-16 GB DDR4 memory would cost about 30$. That gives you a solid upgrade for around $150.

N
70
07-24-2016, 05:14 PM
#7
You'll likely be working with around 60 frames per second in low settings for games like Apex Legends.
N
NoHaxJustADoge
07-24-2016, 05:14 PM #7

You'll likely be working with around 60 frames per second in low settings for games like Apex Legends.

I
iNap
Junior Member
47
07-24-2016, 05:55 PM
#8
No, I didn't.
I
iNap
07-24-2016, 05:55 PM #8

No, I didn't.

R
raider112233
Member
168
07-24-2016, 08:25 PM
#9
It’s going to be quite limited... modern graphics cards will struggle to keep up, making it hard to predict the actual frames per second. The main issue is that upgrading the processor isn’t really worthwhile since even with a better chip, performance will still be poor. You might be able to resell the motherboard, CPU, and RAM as a package for around 80-100 dollars, then buy an AM4 socket solution for about 150 dollars. Instead of spending 50 dollars on eBay for an FX8300 or FX8350, you could add roughly 70-80 dollars to the kit’s cost and still get a significant boost in performance. People would likely buy your package if the price is reasonable, because it’s suitable for older Windows XP systems, home servers, or similar uses.
R
raider112233
07-24-2016, 08:25 PM #9

It’s going to be quite limited... modern graphics cards will struggle to keep up, making it hard to predict the actual frames per second. The main issue is that upgrading the processor isn’t really worthwhile since even with a better chip, performance will still be poor. You might be able to resell the motherboard, CPU, and RAM as a package for around 80-100 dollars, then buy an AM4 socket solution for about 150 dollars. Instead of spending 50 dollars on eBay for an FX8300 or FX8350, you could add roughly 70-80 dollars to the kit’s cost and still get a significant boost in performance. People would likely buy your package if the price is reasonable, because it’s suitable for older Windows XP systems, home servers, or similar uses.

D
161
07-26-2016, 01:27 AM
#10
I don’t have funds for an AM4 motherboard and compatible components, which is why I’m opting for AM3+ instead.
D
Deathangel2005
07-26-2016, 01:27 AM #10

I don’t have funds for an AM4 motherboard and compatible components, which is why I’m opting for AM3+ instead.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next