F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Amd 7500f vs intel i5 14400f

Amd 7500f vs intel i5 14400f

Amd 7500f vs intel i5 14400f

T
thehwk223
Member
169
10-09-2023, 06:56 AM
#1
Hello everyone. I'm considering a new PC build and feeling uncertain between an Intel i5-14400 and an AMD 7500F. While I think AMD could be better, I've had some issues with my current AMD GPU (RX 470). I'm leaning toward choosing an AMD CPU instead. My existing setup includes: Intel i5-14400, Asus Tuf Gaming B760M Plus II motherboard, DDR5 16x2 5600 RAM. For AMD, I have the Ryzen 5 7500F, ASUS PRIME A620M-K motherboard, and DDR5 16x2 5600 RAM. My friend mentioned that the A620M-K might struggle with more powerful CPUs because of its basic motherboard specs. Upgrading the motherboard later would mean swapping out the CPU, which could complicate things. If I want a better upgrade path, I'd need to replace the motherboard, making the AMD build similar to Intel's where I'd have to change both components. For a more advanced motherboard like ASUS TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI, I'd have to spend an extra 220 dollars on the card, which is more than the motherboard itself. I'm torn between these choices and unsure what to decide. Also, I know going with Intel might put me on a less favorable path. Please remember that my options are limited to what's available locally, and I can't order online. Do cores or threads really matter for gaming? Will the 4 cores in the i5-14400 still help me? I've heard that AMD CPUs with six cores could become a bottleneck soon, while Intel's ten-core option might be more future-proof? Thank you in advance.
T
thehwk223
10-09-2023, 06:56 AM #1

Hello everyone. I'm considering a new PC build and feeling uncertain between an Intel i5-14400 and an AMD 7500F. While I think AMD could be better, I've had some issues with my current AMD GPU (RX 470). I'm leaning toward choosing an AMD CPU instead. My existing setup includes: Intel i5-14400, Asus Tuf Gaming B760M Plus II motherboard, DDR5 16x2 5600 RAM. For AMD, I have the Ryzen 5 7500F, ASUS PRIME A620M-K motherboard, and DDR5 16x2 5600 RAM. My friend mentioned that the A620M-K might struggle with more powerful CPUs because of its basic motherboard specs. Upgrading the motherboard later would mean swapping out the CPU, which could complicate things. If I want a better upgrade path, I'd need to replace the motherboard, making the AMD build similar to Intel's where I'd have to change both components. For a more advanced motherboard like ASUS TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI, I'd have to spend an extra 220 dollars on the card, which is more than the motherboard itself. I'm torn between these choices and unsure what to decide. Also, I know going with Intel might put me on a less favorable path. Please remember that my options are limited to what's available locally, and I can't order online. Do cores or threads really matter for gaming? Will the 4 cores in the i5-14400 still help me? I've heard that AMD CPUs with six cores could become a bottleneck soon, while Intel's ten-core option might be more future-proof? Thank you in advance.

K
KablooieKablam
Posting Freak
908
10-11-2023, 03:29 AM
#2
Offers additional capabilities and possible speed improvement over the standard AM board... The 7500f provides nearly identical performance, uses less power, and features a disabled motherboard. I recommend the 14400f.
K
KablooieKablam
10-11-2023, 03:29 AM #2

Offers additional capabilities and possible speed improvement over the standard AM board... The 7500f provides nearly identical performance, uses less power, and features a disabled motherboard. I recommend the 14400f.

C
Cow_Boi
Member
153
10-12-2023, 03:35 AM
#3
I found Timme's reply convincing. To test it, I’d consider AMD. The socket compatibility might let you upgrade later if needed. However, given your budget, I’d prefer Intel instead.
C
Cow_Boi
10-12-2023, 03:35 AM #3

I found Timme's reply convincing. To test it, I’d consider AMD. The socket compatibility might let you upgrade later if needed. However, given your budget, I’d prefer Intel instead.

J
jabbathehutt99
Junior Member
5
10-12-2023, 09:02 AM
#4
the cl latency on ram is 5600mhz, which can be slow. high latency might hurt performance. the prices seem similar, but the cpu costs are comparable while the prime board is significantly more expensive than a 620. where exactly are you purchasing? i wouldn’t even consider buying an asus board right now because of how frustrating amoury crate is with self-installing.
J
jabbathehutt99
10-12-2023, 09:02 AM #4

the cl latency on ram is 5600mhz, which can be slow. high latency might hurt performance. the prices seem similar, but the cpu costs are comparable while the prime board is significantly more expensive than a 620. where exactly are you purchasing? i wouldn’t even consider buying an asus board right now because of how frustrating amoury crate is with self-installing.

M
master_scope
Posting Freak
794
10-19-2023, 11:20 PM
#5
The 14400F/13400F model is considered faster in theory, particularly when handling multiple tasks, though it's only slightly less efficient. The B760 offers better input/output performance, and AM5 support remains assured through at least 2027. You may want to explore other memory options and compare pricing. Be cautious about the core stepping issue; many non-K Raptor Lake CPUs are essentially Alder Lake rebrands, like the 12600K. Performance differences mainly affect power consumption and temperatures. It's interesting that this hasn't been widely discussed by tech reviewers.
M
master_scope
10-19-2023, 11:20 PM #5

The 14400F/13400F model is considered faster in theory, particularly when handling multiple tasks, though it's only slightly less efficient. The B760 offers better input/output performance, and AM5 support remains assured through at least 2027. You may want to explore other memory options and compare pricing. Be cautious about the core stepping issue; many non-K Raptor Lake CPUs are essentially Alder Lake rebrands, like the 12600K. Performance differences mainly affect power consumption and temperatures. It's interesting that this hasn't been widely discussed by tech reviewers.

R
Ravi
Member
65
10-20-2023, 11:02 AM
#6
E-Cores are not designed for gaming purposes. They manage background operations and boost multi-core efficiency for overall productivity. You can observe performance trends since the 14400 offers similar results to the 13400, albeit with marginally higher power usage. The 13400 remains a superior option when considering performance per watt or cost. If you have access to a 13400F model in your region, it could provide a more economical choice, allowing you to allocate savings toward a better motherboard or a dual 16GB memory package. Don’t overlook the opportunity to invest in a high-quality tower cooler—around 20 to 30 dollars is reasonable. For instance, the Thermalright Assassin X 120 R SE delivers solid performance at an affordable price. Tom’s review highlighted the Core i5-13400 as a strong contender on gaming CPU lists thanks to its excellent value compared to Ryzen 5 chips. While the newer $225 Core i5-14400 offers similar silicon, it doesn’t provide substantial real-world gains over its predecessor. Both the 13th and 14th generation models faced stability challenges. The 13400 and 14400 chips lag behind K-series but still perform adequately. Intel claims fixes are available via BIOS updates, but confidence in those changes is questionable. LGA1700 platforms are outdated, whereas AM5 continues to evolve through 2027. The R5 7500F also delivers competitive gaming results, nearing the performance of the 7600 series. Check the charts linked for a detailed comparison. Linus shared a video explaining why the 7500F remains the top budget CPU today, outperforming Intel in many aspects. Review the data and consider pairing it with a 2x 16GB DDR5 6000MHz CL30 memory kit. AMD’s B650 boards are recommended for optimal gaming, offering strong performance at a reasonable price. Keep in mind that Asus boards often underperform until you upgrade to higher-end models, which can be disappointing given your existing Intel K chips. In contrast, AsRock boards tend to run hotter, such as the 84°C on the Prime Plus B650, while the 117C PCB setup with the B650 maintains better thermal stability compared to cheaper alternatives. For AMD users, the B650 remains an ideal balance. The market is full of choices—be mindful of significant differences when selecting components today.
R
Ravi
10-20-2023, 11:02 AM #6

E-Cores are not designed for gaming purposes. They manage background operations and boost multi-core efficiency for overall productivity. You can observe performance trends since the 14400 offers similar results to the 13400, albeit with marginally higher power usage. The 13400 remains a superior option when considering performance per watt or cost. If you have access to a 13400F model in your region, it could provide a more economical choice, allowing you to allocate savings toward a better motherboard or a dual 16GB memory package. Don’t overlook the opportunity to invest in a high-quality tower cooler—around 20 to 30 dollars is reasonable. For instance, the Thermalright Assassin X 120 R SE delivers solid performance at an affordable price. Tom’s review highlighted the Core i5-13400 as a strong contender on gaming CPU lists thanks to its excellent value compared to Ryzen 5 chips. While the newer $225 Core i5-14400 offers similar silicon, it doesn’t provide substantial real-world gains over its predecessor. Both the 13th and 14th generation models faced stability challenges. The 13400 and 14400 chips lag behind K-series but still perform adequately. Intel claims fixes are available via BIOS updates, but confidence in those changes is questionable. LGA1700 platforms are outdated, whereas AM5 continues to evolve through 2027. The R5 7500F also delivers competitive gaming results, nearing the performance of the 7600 series. Check the charts linked for a detailed comparison. Linus shared a video explaining why the 7500F remains the top budget CPU today, outperforming Intel in many aspects. Review the data and consider pairing it with a 2x 16GB DDR5 6000MHz CL30 memory kit. AMD’s B650 boards are recommended for optimal gaming, offering strong performance at a reasonable price. Keep in mind that Asus boards often underperform until you upgrade to higher-end models, which can be disappointing given your existing Intel K chips. In contrast, AsRock boards tend to run hotter, such as the 84°C on the Prime Plus B650, while the 117C PCB setup with the B650 maintains better thermal stability compared to cheaper alternatives. For AMD users, the B650 remains an ideal balance. The market is full of choices—be mindful of significant differences when selecting components today.

I
Ipod984
Senior Member
707
10-22-2023, 09:04 AM
#7
Thanks for the responses, everyone. It seems I might need to explore further to discover better choices.
I
Ipod984
10-22-2023, 09:04 AM #7

Thanks for the responses, everyone. It seems I might need to explore further to discover better choices.