F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop AM4 Mobo VRMs paired with 5950X for enhanced performance

AM4 Mobo VRMs paired with 5950X for enhanced performance

AM4 Mobo VRMs paired with 5950X for enhanced performance

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
I
iKegreenS_
Posting Freak
878
12-01-2018, 01:19 PM
#11
NR200 is a great build—helped a friend install an ITX system there last year. You were amazed at fitting two 240mm radiators inside. With that cooling setup, things should perform well. Try the Ryzen 5900XT; if its VRMs get hot, consider upgrading to a new ITX motherboard. I'm interested in hearing how it goes. Stay updated!
I
iKegreenS_
12-01-2018, 01:19 PM #11

NR200 is a great build—helped a friend install an ITX system there last year. You were amazed at fitting two 240mm radiators inside. With that cooling setup, things should perform well. Try the Ryzen 5900XT; if its VRMs get hot, consider upgrading to a new ITX motherboard. I'm interested in hearing how it goes. Stay updated!

S
Sandaletto01
Member
165
12-01-2018, 01:19 PM
#12
Recent notes indicate strong AVX all-core performance with around 145 watts consumed and VRM temperatures hovering near 80°C. The boost frequency reached 3.9GHz, suggesting power constraints rather than thermal throttling. While the stress test lasted only ten minutes, it showed stable operation compared to a reference benchmark for the 5950X, indicating overall health. A minor drawback was the lack of MX5 cooling, which contributed to the higher temperatures. The issue may stem from using an older XSPC K2 board, causing peak temps to rise to about 74°C.
S
Sandaletto01
12-01-2018, 01:19 PM #12

Recent notes indicate strong AVX all-core performance with around 145 watts consumed and VRM temperatures hovering near 80°C. The boost frequency reached 3.9GHz, suggesting power constraints rather than thermal throttling. While the stress test lasted only ten minutes, it showed stable operation compared to a reference benchmark for the 5950X, indicating overall health. A minor drawback was the lack of MX5 cooling, which contributed to the higher temperatures. The issue may stem from using an older XSPC K2 board, causing peak temps to rise to about 74°C.

T
TosTeReKKK
Member
106
12-01-2018, 01:19 PM
#13
Stock clocks are perfectly normal. My 5900X handles 260W with PBO, and the 9900X reaches 300W. The 5950X should manage around 300W if you maintain proper cooling—though it demands significant cooling power, not quiet operation at that level. That would be insufficient cooling. At stock, my 5900X struggles to exceed 60°C.
T
TosTeReKKK
12-01-2018, 01:19 PM #13

Stock clocks are perfectly normal. My 5900X handles 260W with PBO, and the 9900X reaches 300W. The 5950X should manage around 300W if you maintain proper cooling—though it demands significant cooling power, not quiet operation at that level. That would be insufficient cooling. At stock, my 5900X struggles to exceed 60°C.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2