F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Alder Lake and two 3090 units seem extremely challenging.

Alder Lake and two 3090 units seem extremely challenging.

Alder Lake and two 3090 units seem extremely challenging.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
S
sacapatates
Posting Freak
843
05-07-2021, 06:49 AM
#11
Yes, both slots need to be x16 electrically. This ensures compatibility and proper functionality.
S
sacapatates
05-07-2021, 06:49 AM #11

Yes, both slots need to be x16 electrically. This ensures compatibility and proper functionality.

D
DjReindeer5
Member
123
05-07-2021, 07:30 AM
#12
Need a minimum of eight or more? I believe 3090 should work fine with that amount.
D
DjReindeer5
05-07-2021, 07:30 AM #12

Need a minimum of eight or more? I believe 3090 should work fine with that amount.

J
jmoorse
Member
62
05-25-2021, 12:17 AM
#13
It functions properly on X4. The problem seems to occur when trying to boot from a GPU in an X4 slot, which isn't an issue if you're using 2.
J
jmoorse
05-25-2021, 12:17 AM #13

It functions properly on X4. The problem seems to occur when trying to boot from a GPU in an X4 slot, which isn't an issue if you're using 2.

J
Juan2610
Posting Freak
875
05-25-2021, 02:36 AM
#14
Many racks support x8/x8 on Z690, but finding DDR4 options is rare. The most affordable choice is the MSI Z690 Carbon, though its spacing isn’t ideal for dual 3090s. The Gigabyte Z690 Aero D offers a better fit.
J
Juan2610
05-25-2021, 02:36 AM #14

Many racks support x8/x8 on Z690, but finding DDR4 options is rare. The most affordable choice is the MSI Z690 Carbon, though its spacing isn’t ideal for dual 3090s. The Gigabyte Z690 Aero D offers a better fit.

E
El_Chipo
Junior Member
44
05-25-2021, 09:24 AM
#15
Sure, I appreciated you bringing that up. The Gigabyte Z690 Aero D also seems appealing. Thanks!
E
El_Chipo
05-25-2021, 09:24 AM #15

Sure, I appreciated you bringing that up. The Gigabyte Z690 Aero D also seems appealing. Thanks!

S
StyleTrick
Senior Member
744
05-25-2021, 02:50 PM
#16
That's one test with one workload. I wouldn't presume without knowing for sure if the build is for a specific purpose. It is quite easy to do a general estimate by observing the bus utilisation in GPU-Z under load and you can extrapolate from there. Can't find details, as it is not something I was that deep into, but I recall folding is notably hindered if you run it x1 mining style. I'm pretty sure some other previous distributed computing GPU projects did have some significant bus utilisation during the PCIe 3.0 era.
S
StyleTrick
05-25-2021, 02:50 PM #16

That's one test with one workload. I wouldn't presume without knowing for sure if the build is for a specific purpose. It is quite easy to do a general estimate by observing the bus utilisation in GPU-Z under load and you can extrapolate from there. Can't find details, as it is not something I was that deep into, but I recall folding is notably hindered if you run it x1 mining style. I'm pretty sure some other previous distributed computing GPU projects did have some significant bus utilisation during the PCIe 3.0 era.

M
MaxKing2003
Junior Member
8
05-25-2021, 09:36 PM
#17
Z690 focuses heavily on M.2, which makes it seem like many didn’t prioritize proper electrical connections. It’s disappointing since I’d prefer PCIe slots over multiple M.2 ports. Who would be using so many M.2 drives?
M
MaxKing2003
05-25-2021, 09:36 PM #17

Z690 focuses heavily on M.2, which makes it seem like many didn’t prioritize proper electrical connections. It’s disappointing since I’d prefer PCIe slots over multiple M.2 ports. Who would be using so many M.2 drives?

E
ErennnE
Junior Member
41
05-26-2021, 11:53 PM
#18
It's mainly due to the high cost of PCIe Gen 5 switches. Gen 4 ones were already costly (hence only half of X570 and B550 boards support x8/x8), and Gen 5 adds more. Z690 boards start around $500 and include x8/x8, while cheaper options lack it because PCIe Gen 5 demands more advanced PCB layers and the Z690 chipset is expensive on its own.
E
ErennnE
05-26-2021, 11:53 PM #18

It's mainly due to the high cost of PCIe Gen 5 switches. Gen 4 ones were already costly (hence only half of X570 and B550 boards support x8/x8), and Gen 5 adds more. Z690 boards start around $500 and include x8/x8, while cheaper options lack it because PCIe Gen 5 demands more advanced PCB layers and the Z690 chipset is expensive on its own.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2