F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Aida 64 benchmark for high-speed cache and memory performance

Aida 64 benchmark for high-speed cache and memory performance

Aida 64 benchmark for high-speed cache and memory performance

C
ColaSis264
Junior Member
12
07-01-2021, 06:24 PM
#1
The outcomes appear satisfactory. The CPU is an Intel i7 11700f with power limits disabled and a short time limit capped at 128 seconds. RAM specifications include 24GB DDR4 (ADATA XPG Mix D30, 16GB, 3200MHz) and 8GB LPDDR4X (Corsair Vengeance LPX, 3200MHz). GPU is an AMD RX 6700 XT. AIDA64 Extreme Cache and memory benchmarks yield varying results each time. Trfc:880 Gear mode 1 – Edited November 4, 2023 by Anjani
C
ColaSis264
07-01-2021, 06:24 PM #1

The outcomes appear satisfactory. The CPU is an Intel i7 11700f with power limits disabled and a short time limit capped at 128 seconds. RAM specifications include 24GB DDR4 (ADATA XPG Mix D30, 16GB, 3200MHz) and 8GB LPDDR4X (Corsair Vengeance LPX, 3200MHz). GPU is an AMD RX 6700 XT. AIDA64 Extreme Cache and memory benchmarks yield varying results each time. Trfc:880 Gear mode 1 – Edited November 4, 2023 by Anjani

A
Ay_TeX
Junior Member
42
07-02-2021, 02:31 AM
#2
First result looks ball park within expectations. 2nd one lower. Made sure nothing else was running at the time? Windows has a nasty habit of doing that. For comparison here's my 11700k, turbo disabled, 3200 2Rx8 ram. Especially since my ram is 2R it helps a lot with effective bandwidth compared to 1R modules that are more common. Beware my copy of Aida64 is old and before it supported Rocket Lake.
A
Ay_TeX
07-02-2021, 02:31 AM #2

First result looks ball park within expectations. 2nd one lower. Made sure nothing else was running at the time? Windows has a nasty habit of doing that. For comparison here's my 11700k, turbo disabled, 3200 2Rx8 ram. Especially since my ram is 2R it helps a lot with effective bandwidth compared to 1R modules that are more common. Beware my copy of Aida64 is old and before it supported Rocket Lake.

S
ST33L_REFL3X
Junior Member
13
07-03-2021, 04:40 PM
#3
I've just upgraded to the latest version. Aida 64 is now considered outdated and not up-to-date with modern tools like Passmark or OCCT. It struggles to keep up with mainstream benchmarking software. The Extreme version doesn't perform very well in terms of speed. Also, I wonder if you see different results each time. How can I achieve a read/write speed of 48,000 MB/s? What is your TRFC value?
S
ST33L_REFL3X
07-03-2021, 04:40 PM #3

I've just upgraded to the latest version. Aida 64 is now considered outdated and not up-to-date with modern tools like Passmark or OCCT. It struggles to keep up with mainstream benchmarking software. The Extreme version doesn't perform very well in terms of speed. Also, I wonder if you see different results each time. How can I achieve a read/write speed of 48,000 MB/s? What is your TRFC value?

R
142
07-07-2021, 10:01 PM
#4
Aida64 was once popular among overclockers. Its tests are mainly made up. OCCT is something I haven’t used much lately, just think of it as a stability checker. I don’t really care about Passmark scores. Ultimately, it comes down to what you’re trying to verify. For CPUs I mostly rely on Prime95 (it also has benchmarks, but they can be confusing unless you dive in), and Y-cruncher. Cinebench is still seen as a bit of a joke, though 2024 seems to be getting a bit more interesting. I expect some variation between runs, but the differences shown in your screenshots probably aren’t that big. My RAM is 2GB, which really boosts real-world speed. I’d guess yours is 1GB. You can check with CPU-Z (look at the single/double ranks), or try Thaiphoon Burner if you need it. Alternatively, you could run 2DPC for similar results—like I do, running eight single-rank modules on my X299. It’s possible to get better performance by adjusting RAM timings manually, but that’s a complicated process with risks of instability and data loss. I’d rather not try it again. No idea. Just enable XMP and let it handle itself. I haven’t changed RAM settings in ages.
R
RM_55_BlackRoi
07-07-2021, 10:01 PM #4

Aida64 was once popular among overclockers. Its tests are mainly made up. OCCT is something I haven’t used much lately, just think of it as a stability checker. I don’t really care about Passmark scores. Ultimately, it comes down to what you’re trying to verify. For CPUs I mostly rely on Prime95 (it also has benchmarks, but they can be confusing unless you dive in), and Y-cruncher. Cinebench is still seen as a bit of a joke, though 2024 seems to be getting a bit more interesting. I expect some variation between runs, but the differences shown in your screenshots probably aren’t that big. My RAM is 2GB, which really boosts real-world speed. I’d guess yours is 1GB. You can check with CPU-Z (look at the single/double ranks), or try Thaiphoon Burner if you need it. Alternatively, you could run 2DPC for similar results—like I do, running eight single-rank modules on my X299. It’s possible to get better performance by adjusting RAM timings manually, but that’s a complicated process with risks of instability and data loss. I’d rather not try it again. No idea. Just enable XMP and let it handle itself. I haven’t changed RAM settings in ages.

L
Lord_Phoenix77
Junior Member
3
07-08-2021, 06:24 AM
#5
The game is Minecraft: Bedrock Edition. For the latest benchmarking tools, consider using popular platforms like Newbench or Geekbench to compare performance across different versions.
L
Lord_Phoenix77
07-08-2021, 06:24 AM #5

The game is Minecraft: Bedrock Edition. For the latest benchmarking tools, consider using popular platforms like Newbench or Geekbench to compare performance across different versions.

M
MegaBUFFALO
Member
161
07-11-2021, 11:52 PM
#6
You aim to assess performance in a specific area. Benchmarks provide a way to quantify how something performs. You're looking for insights into what matters most, such as Cinebench, which may not always reflect your needs.
M
MegaBUFFALO
07-11-2021, 11:52 PM #6

You aim to assess performance in a specific area. Benchmarks provide a way to quantify how something performs. You're looking for insights into what matters most, such as Cinebench, which may not always reflect your needs.

T
TrilogyXO
Member
154
07-12-2021, 01:36 AM
#7
Here you go... Everything is fine while I'm here.
T
TrilogyXO
07-12-2021, 01:36 AM #7

Here you go... Everything is fine while I'm here.

E
ElitexWizard
Member
210
07-12-2021, 06:25 AM
#8
You are using cl 14 timing plus it is running at 3600mhz.. More you have better processor means higher memory bandwidth.. So more speed, there is no comparison between the two
E
ElitexWizard
07-12-2021, 06:25 AM #8

You are using cl 14 timing plus it is running at 3600mhz.. More you have better processor means higher memory bandwidth.. So more speed, there is no comparison between the two