F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Adjusting performance of i7 7700k on a GIGABYTE Z170X-GAMING 3

Adjusting performance of i7 7700k on a GIGABYTE Z170X-GAMING 3

Adjusting performance of i7 7700k on a GIGABYTE Z170X-GAMING 3

0
05x
Junior Member
12
10-29-2017, 04:04 AM
#1
I've had an overclocked 6600k in my system. I just got a 7700k at a good price. I've already flashed and updated the bios to the latest version that supports the new CPU...
Can I still try to overclock the CPU on this board? More info: overclocking 7700k gigabyte z170x gaming
0
05x
10-29-2017, 04:04 AM #1

I've had an overclocked 6600k in my system. I just got a 7700k at a good price. I've already flashed and updated the bios to the latest version that supports the new CPU...
Can I still try to overclock the CPU on this board? More info: overclocking 7700k gigabyte z170x gaming

M
masonight
Member
175
10-29-2017, 05:31 AM
#2
Sure, I can help with that. Let me rephrase it for you.
M
masonight
10-29-2017, 05:31 AM #2

Sure, I can help with that. Let me rephrase it for you.

T
TryHardPro1
Member
114
10-29-2017, 06:44 AM
#3
The claim that Prime95 beyond v266 will yield temperatures higher than accurate is being questioned. Your observations from running tests with different versions suggest otherwise. You noted lower readings on v266 compared to earlier versions. For stress testing stable CPUs and capturing realistic gaming performance, you’re considering alternatives. Xtreme Tuning Utility or RealBench may offer better results. Your recent findings with Prime95, Xtreme Tuning, and RealBench show stable operation without crashes. The temperatures recorded during short tests were within acceptable ranges. You’re leaning toward Realbench for more realistic stability assessments. Cache Frequency hasn’t been tested yet—worth considering if you plan deeper analysis.
T
TryHardPro1
10-29-2017, 06:44 AM #3

The claim that Prime95 beyond v266 will yield temperatures higher than accurate is being questioned. Your observations from running tests with different versions suggest otherwise. You noted lower readings on v266 compared to earlier versions. For stress testing stable CPUs and capturing realistic gaming performance, you’re considering alternatives. Xtreme Tuning Utility or RealBench may offer better results. Your recent findings with Prime95, Xtreme Tuning, and RealBench show stable operation without crashes. The temperatures recorded during short tests were within acceptable ranges. You’re leaning toward Realbench for more realistic stability assessments. Cache Frequency hasn’t been tested yet—worth considering if you plan deeper analysis.

D
DJCOOL2008
Member
64
10-29-2017, 08:43 AM
#4
Most probably, only time will reveal if these are genuine tests and not identical to actual stress conditions. Considering your description, it seems like you're confident about your setup, right? What cooling method are you employing for the CPU?
D
DJCOOL2008
10-29-2017, 08:43 AM #4

Most probably, only time will reveal if these are genuine tests and not identical to actual stress conditions. Considering your description, it seems like you're confident about your setup, right? What cooling method are you employing for the CPU?

H
Hoewls
Member
145
10-31-2017, 09:48 PM
#5
Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO Direct Touch 4 Heatpipe Heatsink with thermal paste included. The removal process was challenging, especially when installing it on the new CPU. Would increasing the Cache/Uncore Frequency above 4.2 necessitate a higher voltage?

Latest testing raised Uncore/Cache Frequency to 4.6 without changing voltage. All bench tests passed: 2-hour real-world test and hour-long Prime95 and Xtreme Tuning runs completed successfully. The current settings show a stable performance with temperatures staying within safe limits (85°C for Prime95, 80°C for Realbench).
H
Hoewls
10-31-2017, 09:48 PM #5

Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO Direct Touch 4 Heatpipe Heatsink with thermal paste included. The removal process was challenging, especially when installing it on the new CPU. Would increasing the Cache/Uncore Frequency above 4.2 necessitate a higher voltage?

Latest testing raised Uncore/Cache Frequency to 4.6 without changing voltage. All bench tests passed: 2-hour real-world test and hour-long Prime95 and Xtreme Tuning runs completed successfully. The current settings show a stable performance with temperatures staying within safe limits (85°C for Prime95, 80°C for Realbench).