F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Adjusting performance beyond limits for the I9-9900K and monitoring heat levels

Adjusting performance beyond limits for the I9-9900K and monitoring heat levels

Adjusting performance beyond limits for the I9-9900K and monitoring heat levels

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
T
techiseasy
Senior Member
688
11-07-2018, 04:46 AM
#1
Hello everyone. I've assembled my first rig about a month ago and have been searching for the best overclocking configurations for the 9900k with Corsair H115i PRO cooling. It seems my progress hasn't been as promising as I hoped, and I managed to hit a steady 4.9GHz at 1.29V using LLC Turbo. Reaching 5GHz is possible but temperatures become too high. I'm worried about the effects of these high temps during stress tests like Cinebench R15, R20, and the Intel XTU benchmark (which can hit 86°C). I've replaced the AIO multiple times and even used aftermarket thermal paste, which helped a bit, but it's still insufficient. I also checked the case airflow, and reviews suggest others can achieve lower temps at higher voltages with the same cooler. What might be causing this difference? Also, are these temperatures safe to maintain?
T
techiseasy
11-07-2018, 04:46 AM #1

Hello everyone. I've assembled my first rig about a month ago and have been searching for the best overclocking configurations for the 9900k with Corsair H115i PRO cooling. It seems my progress hasn't been as promising as I hoped, and I managed to hit a steady 4.9GHz at 1.29V using LLC Turbo. Reaching 5GHz is possible but temperatures become too high. I'm worried about the effects of these high temps during stress tests like Cinebench R15, R20, and the Intel XTU benchmark (which can hit 86°C). I've replaced the AIO multiple times and even used aftermarket thermal paste, which helped a bit, but it's still insufficient. I also checked the case airflow, and reviews suggest others can achieve lower temps at higher voltages with the same cooler. What might be causing this difference? Also, are these temperatures safe to maintain?

B
blackceaser
Member
119
11-07-2018, 01:41 PM
#2
What are the maximum fan and pump speeds?
B
blackceaser
11-07-2018, 01:41 PM #2

What are the maximum fan and pump speeds?

C
Cpt_Cookies
Junior Member
4
11-13-2018, 07:12 AM
#3
In ICUE the settings are set to "Extreme," which reduces temperatures by just 2-3°C.
C
Cpt_Cookies
11-13-2018, 07:12 AM #3

In ICUE the settings are set to "Extreme," which reduces temperatures by just 2-3°C.

P
Pierot_BR
Junior Member
25
11-15-2018, 01:37 AM
#4
It's a powerful processor, particularly when pushed to higher speeds
P
Pierot_BR
11-15-2018, 01:37 AM #4

It's a powerful processor, particularly when pushed to higher speeds

M
mmillaa
Member
197
11-16-2018, 04:41 AM
#5
I don't see information on the H115i Pro, except for comparisons with H115i Platinum and other similar 280mm rad coolers. The H118i Pro has the lowest fan speed (1200 RPM), while the Platinum runs at 2000 RPM and the EVGA CLC 280 uses 2800 RPM fans. Slower fans generally mean reduced performance, which makes sense.
M
mmillaa
11-16-2018, 04:41 AM #5

I don't see information on the H115i Pro, except for comparisons with H115i Platinum and other similar 280mm rad coolers. The H118i Pro has the lowest fan speed (1200 RPM), while the Platinum runs at 2000 RPM and the EVGA CLC 280 uses 2800 RPM fans. Slower fans generally mean reduced performance, which makes sense.

A
ActiveHyper
Member
62
11-16-2018, 08:04 AM
#6
The 9900K generates a lot of heat, so pairing it with a high-end Noctua cooler or a larger AIO would be ideal.
A
ActiveHyper
11-16-2018, 08:04 AM #6

The 9900K generates a lot of heat, so pairing it with a high-end Noctua cooler or a larger AIO would be ideal.

D
DaWay
Junior Member
11
11-24-2018, 12:32 AM
#7
It looks like you're questioning why others with similar preferences still manage to get lower temperatures under higher voltages. This might seem odd. As for safety, those readings should be checked to ensure they won't lead to issues later.
D
DaWay
11-24-2018, 12:32 AM #7

It looks like you're questioning why others with similar preferences still manage to get lower temperatures under higher voltages. This might seem odd. As for safety, those readings should be checked to ensure they won't lead to issues later.

K
Kraakka2005
Member
109
12-07-2018, 04:18 PM
#8
1.3v tends to be on the higher side; usually you'd see around 5.2GHz at that level. Lowering it to 1.2v brings you to about 4.9GHz.
K
Kraakka2005
12-07-2018, 04:18 PM #8

1.3v tends to be on the higher side; usually you'd see around 5.2GHz at that level. Lowering it to 1.2v brings you to about 4.9GHz.

N
Nird_Bird
Member
165
12-12-2018, 12:54 AM
#9
I've tried before without success; 1.29V is the only reliable voltage. At 5.0GHz it needs 1.330V, but testing has been limited because of high temperatures. As mentioned, the silicon selection wasn't ideal. By the way, could high temperatures stem from the CPU itself (possibly a bad silicon choice)?
N
Nird_Bird
12-12-2018, 12:54 AM #9

I've tried before without success; 1.29V is the only reliable voltage. At 5.0GHz it needs 1.330V, but testing has been limited because of high temperatures. As mentioned, the silicon selection wasn't ideal. By the way, could high temperatures stem from the CPU itself (possibly a bad silicon choice)?

F
Finn_McCoul
Junior Member
4
12-12-2018, 12:08 PM
#10
Here are some references you might find useful:
- Check the datasheet for your component to confirm operating parameters.
- Look up specifications for 5.2GHz at 1.3V conditions.
- Consult reliability studies on high-temperature performance.
- Review documentation about degradation rates near 90°C.
F
Finn_McCoul
12-12-2018, 12:08 PM #10

Here are some references you might find useful:
- Check the datasheet for your component to confirm operating parameters.
- Look up specifications for 5.2GHz at 1.3V conditions.
- Consult reliability studies on high-temperature performance.
- Review documentation about degradation rates near 90°C.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next