F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Adjusting an I5-3570k processor from 3.4GHz to 4.4GHz requires careful consideration of stability and compatibility.

Adjusting an I5-3570k processor from 3.4GHz to 4.4GHz requires careful consideration of stability and compatibility.

Adjusting an I5-3570k processor from 3.4GHz to 4.4GHz requires careful consideration of stability and compatibility.

J
JBeast2014
Member
169
10-27-2016, 06:11 PM
#1
Hello , Just wanted some advice
i recently started my first overclock after days of researching tutorials and forums
My question is there are a
lot
of posts with variable Voltage Instructions.
For example, I managed to get my CPU to run at 4.4GHZ at 1.16V , ran prime for 12 hours with no errors and max temp of 77c (I'm running a Arctic Bionix with fans on both sides of the radiator), but I've seen a lot of people giving their CPU's 2.75V for 4.4GHZ and am thinking why is their such a huge difference ?
no blue screens as of yet and have defiantly noticed a improvement in Football manager 21 speeds
My set up is 3.4ghz i5-3570k (oc to 4.4ghz)
MoBo is GIGABYTE Z77X-D3H
32gb of corsair 1600mhz ram (4 x 8gb)
Nvidia 970 4gb GPU
J
JBeast2014
10-27-2016, 06:11 PM #1

Hello , Just wanted some advice
i recently started my first overclock after days of researching tutorials and forums
My question is there are a
lot
of posts with variable Voltage Instructions.
For example, I managed to get my CPU to run at 4.4GHZ at 1.16V , ran prime for 12 hours with no errors and max temp of 77c (I'm running a Arctic Bionix with fans on both sides of the radiator), but I've seen a lot of people giving their CPU's 2.75V for 4.4GHZ and am thinking why is their such a huge difference ?
no blue screens as of yet and have defiantly noticed a improvement in Football manager 21 speeds
My set up is 3.4ghz i5-3570k (oc to 4.4ghz)
MoBo is GIGABYTE Z77X-D3H
32gb of corsair 1600mhz ram (4 x 8gb)
Nvidia 970 4gb GPU

K
KlayDog1
Senior Member
685
11-04-2016, 01:29 AM
#2
For the advantage of all users:
Each Microarchitecture, measured in nanometers, comes with a “Maximum Recommended Vcore”. It’s crucial to note that 22 nanometer 3rd and 4th Generation processors will not handle the increased core voltages of other Microarchitectures.
Below is the Maximum Recommended Vcore range per Microarchitecture from 14 to 65 nanometers since 2006:
K
KlayDog1
11-04-2016, 01:29 AM #2

For the advantage of all users:
Each Microarchitecture, measured in nanometers, comes with a “Maximum Recommended Vcore”. It’s crucial to note that 22 nanometer 3rd and 4th Generation processors will not handle the increased core voltages of other Microarchitectures.
Below is the Maximum Recommended Vcore range per Microarchitecture from 14 to 65 nanometers since 2006:

G
62
11-09-2016, 04:18 AM
#3
2.75 volts would cause the CPU to fail...Even liquid nitrogen wouldn't be enough. The input voltage to the CPU VRMs can reach up to 2+ volts, but that's not the core voltage. 1.4 is regarded as the safe limit for Ivy Bridge, and remains a solid guideline with Intel, though it has slightly decreased and usually 1.35 is seen as the maximum for regular use.
G
greatcanada123
11-09-2016, 04:18 AM #3

2.75 volts would cause the CPU to fail...Even liquid nitrogen wouldn't be enough. The input voltage to the CPU VRMs can reach up to 2+ volts, but that's not the core voltage. 1.4 is regarded as the safe limit for Ivy Bridge, and remains a solid guideline with Intel, though it has slightly decreased and usually 1.35 is seen as the maximum for regular use.

B
betomblok
Member
196
11-15-2016, 05:30 PM
#4
As mentioned before, these voltages don't seem correct, which suggests there might be an error. The variation in voltages comes from each processor's unique manufacturing quality, meaning many won't reach 4.4ghz.
B
betomblok
11-15-2016, 05:30 PM #4

As mentioned before, these voltages don't seem correct, which suggests there might be an error. The variation in voltages comes from each processor's unique manufacturing quality, meaning many won't reach 4.4ghz.

D
dani2401
Member
226
11-17-2016, 01:16 PM
#5
Think you're meaning 1.275v
D
dani2401
11-17-2016, 01:16 PM #5

Think you're meaning 1.275v

R
RentoxGHG
Member
54
11-23-2016, 06:53 AM
#6
My 3570k ran smoothly at 1.114v and 4.3GHz, feeling perfectly content throughout; it never experienced any BSODs or temperature problems. Even when pushing to 4.4GHz with a voltage of 1.55v, it stayed stable, and I tested various configurations—changing PLL to 1.7v, adjusting LLC settings, trying different frequencies. It was all part of the silicon lottery.

My i7-3770K, which shares the same CPU architecture as the i5-3570k with hyperthreading, would reach 5.0GHz at 1.42v but I preferred a steadier 4.9GHz at 1.308v. Once again, it was a matter of chance.

CPUs are crafted from silicon. Each batch contains varying impurities—some may have tiny traces of gold, others lead, copper, or carbon. These levels shift during manufacturing, with the center of the wafer being purer and the edges more contaminated. This means no two CPUs are exactly alike. Even if they seem similar, at nanometer scales, differences matter significantly.

Each CPU can vary slightly in voltage or current output, which directly affects stability across frequencies. Instability is something you can observe.

For reliable results, run tests like Asus RealBench or Cinebench R20 for 10 minutes, then repeat for at least 4 hours—ideally 8. If it passes, you’ve achieved a successful overclock. Don’t stress about temperatures.

Temperatures can be managed with tools like Prime95 Small FFT, an air cooler for 10 minutes, or liquid cooling for 30 minutes. Since Ivy-Bridge supports AVX, consider disabling or turning it off.

If your system remains stable and temperatures are manageable, you’re good to go. The key is consistency across all measurements.

Batch differences also play a role. CPUs produced in Oregon (22nm) were manufactured in places like Costa Rica or Malaysia before final assembly. Some ran hotter at lower voltages, others handled higher voltages better depending on the TIM (Sandy-Bridge soldered vs Ivy-Bridge with paste) and the base material used.

So, variations in voltage, overclock potential, and temperatures will depend on the batch. It’s the difference between a Wednesday-built CPU and a Monday-built one that matters.
R
RentoxGHG
11-23-2016, 06:53 AM #6

My 3570k ran smoothly at 1.114v and 4.3GHz, feeling perfectly content throughout; it never experienced any BSODs or temperature problems. Even when pushing to 4.4GHz with a voltage of 1.55v, it stayed stable, and I tested various configurations—changing PLL to 1.7v, adjusting LLC settings, trying different frequencies. It was all part of the silicon lottery.

My i7-3770K, which shares the same CPU architecture as the i5-3570k with hyperthreading, would reach 5.0GHz at 1.42v but I preferred a steadier 4.9GHz at 1.308v. Once again, it was a matter of chance.

CPUs are crafted from silicon. Each batch contains varying impurities—some may have tiny traces of gold, others lead, copper, or carbon. These levels shift during manufacturing, with the center of the wafer being purer and the edges more contaminated. This means no two CPUs are exactly alike. Even if they seem similar, at nanometer scales, differences matter significantly.

Each CPU can vary slightly in voltage or current output, which directly affects stability across frequencies. Instability is something you can observe.

For reliable results, run tests like Asus RealBench or Cinebench R20 for 10 minutes, then repeat for at least 4 hours—ideally 8. If it passes, you’ve achieved a successful overclock. Don’t stress about temperatures.

Temperatures can be managed with tools like Prime95 Small FFT, an air cooler for 10 minutes, or liquid cooling for 30 minutes. Since Ivy-Bridge supports AVX, consider disabling or turning it off.

If your system remains stable and temperatures are manageable, you’re good to go. The key is consistency across all measurements.

Batch differences also play a role. CPUs produced in Oregon (22nm) were manufactured in places like Costa Rica or Malaysia before final assembly. Some ran hotter at lower voltages, others handled higher voltages better depending on the TIM (Sandy-Bridge soldered vs Ivy-Bridge with paste) and the base material used.

So, variations in voltage, overclock potential, and temperatures will depend on the batch. It’s the difference between a Wednesday-built CPU and a Monday-built one that matters.

T
tommykos
Junior Member
9
11-23-2016, 07:44 AM
#7
For everyone's benefit:
Each Microarchitecture, which is expressed in "nanometers" (nm), has a “Maximum Recommended Vcore”. For example, it’s important to point out that 22 nanometer 3rd and 4th Generation processors will
not
tolerate the higher Core voltages of other Microarchitectures.
Here's the Maximum Recommended Vcore per Microarchitecture from 14 to 65 nanometers since 2006:
We know that over time, excessive voltage and heat damages electronics, so when using manual Vcore settings in BIOS, excessive Core voltage and Core temperature can cause accelerated "
Electromigration
". Processors have multiple layers of hundreds of millions of microscopic
nanometer
scale components. Electromigration erodes fragile circuit pathways and transistor junctions which results in the
degradation
of overclock stability, and thus performance.
Although your initial overclock may be stable, degradation doesn't appear until later, when increasingly frequent blue-screen crashes indicate a progressive loss of stability. The more excessive the levels of voltage and heat and the longer they're sustained determines how long until transistor degradation destabilizes your overclock. Decreasing overclock and Vcore may temporarily restore stability and slow the rate of degradation.
Extreme
overvolting can cause degradation in minutes, but a sensible overclock remains stable for years.
Each Microarchitecture also has a "
Degradation Curve
". As a rule, CPUs are more susceptible to electromigration and degradation with each Die-shrink. However, the exception to the rule is 14 nanometer (nm) Microarchitecture, where advances in
FinFET
transistor technology have improved voltage tolerance.
Here's how the Degradation Curves correspond to Maximum Recommended Vcore for 22 nanometer 3rd and 4th Generation, which differs from 14 nanometer 5th through 10th Generation:
Degradation Curves are relative to the term “
Vt
(
Voltage threshold
)
Shift
” which is expressed in millivolts (mv). Users can not monitor Vt Shift. With respect to overclocking and overvolting, Vt Shift basically represents the potential for
permanent
loss of normal transistor performance. Excessively high Core voltage drives excessively high Power consumption and Core temperatures, all of which contribute to gradual Vt Shift over time. Core voltages that impose high Vt Shift values are
not
recommended.
To achieve the highest overclock, keep in mind that for your final 100 MHz increase, a corresponding increase in Core voltage of about 50 millivolts (0.050) is needed to maintain stability. If 70 millivolts (0.070) or more is needed for the next stable 100 MHz increase, it means you're attempting to overclock your processor beyond its capability. All processors reach a limit where an additional increase in Core voltage will
not
stabilize another 100 MHz increase in Frequency.
Here's an example of a Core Voltage / Frequency Curve:
With high-end cooling you might reach your Maximum Recommended Vcore limit before you reach the ideal Core temperature limit at
80
°C. With low-end cooling you’ll reach
80
°C before your Vcore limit. Regardless, whichever overclocking limit you reach first is where you should stop.
Remember to keep overclocking in perspective. For example, the difference between 4.5 and 4.6 GHz is less than 2.3%, which has no noticeable impact on overall system performance. It simply isn’t worth pushing your processor beyond recommended Core voltage and Core temperature limits just to squeeze out another 100 MHz.

CPU Overclocking Guide and Tutorial for Beginners
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
Intel Performance Maximizer
For everyone's benefit:
Advanced Vector Extension (AVX) Instruction Sets were introduced with Core i 2nd Generation, then AVX2 with 4th Generation and AVX-512 with later Generations of certain High End Desktop (HEDT) X-Series, Extreme, i9s and i7s
. Each AVX Instruction Set is progressively faster in calculation workloads,
if
you run software that uses AVX codes. Unfortunately, AVX can
adversely affect stability
by
overloading your CPU
, which will
dramatically increase Power consumption and Core temperatures
.
2nd Generation Sandy Bridge processors and 3rd Generation Ivy Bridge processors both have the original AVX Instruction Set, but not the later AVX2 Instruction Set. This is in the Product Specifications website as well as in the Datasheets.
kappsta87
,
Here's the nominal operating range for Core temperature:
Core temperatures above
85
°C are not recommended
.
Core temperatures below
80
°C are ideal
.
For testing thermal performance, run Prime95 Small FFTs, but to conform with Intel's Datasheets, be certain to disable AVX for valid results.
CT
T
tommykos
11-23-2016, 07:44 AM #7

For everyone's benefit:
Each Microarchitecture, which is expressed in "nanometers" (nm), has a “Maximum Recommended Vcore”. For example, it’s important to point out that 22 nanometer 3rd and 4th Generation processors will
not
tolerate the higher Core voltages of other Microarchitectures.
Here's the Maximum Recommended Vcore per Microarchitecture from 14 to 65 nanometers since 2006:
We know that over time, excessive voltage and heat damages electronics, so when using manual Vcore settings in BIOS, excessive Core voltage and Core temperature can cause accelerated "
Electromigration
". Processors have multiple layers of hundreds of millions of microscopic
nanometer
scale components. Electromigration erodes fragile circuit pathways and transistor junctions which results in the
degradation
of overclock stability, and thus performance.
Although your initial overclock may be stable, degradation doesn't appear until later, when increasingly frequent blue-screen crashes indicate a progressive loss of stability. The more excessive the levels of voltage and heat and the longer they're sustained determines how long until transistor degradation destabilizes your overclock. Decreasing overclock and Vcore may temporarily restore stability and slow the rate of degradation.
Extreme
overvolting can cause degradation in minutes, but a sensible overclock remains stable for years.
Each Microarchitecture also has a "
Degradation Curve
". As a rule, CPUs are more susceptible to electromigration and degradation with each Die-shrink. However, the exception to the rule is 14 nanometer (nm) Microarchitecture, where advances in
FinFET
transistor technology have improved voltage tolerance.
Here's how the Degradation Curves correspond to Maximum Recommended Vcore for 22 nanometer 3rd and 4th Generation, which differs from 14 nanometer 5th through 10th Generation:
Degradation Curves are relative to the term “
Vt
(
Voltage threshold
)
Shift
” which is expressed in millivolts (mv). Users can not monitor Vt Shift. With respect to overclocking and overvolting, Vt Shift basically represents the potential for
permanent
loss of normal transistor performance. Excessively high Core voltage drives excessively high Power consumption and Core temperatures, all of which contribute to gradual Vt Shift over time. Core voltages that impose high Vt Shift values are
not
recommended.
To achieve the highest overclock, keep in mind that for your final 100 MHz increase, a corresponding increase in Core voltage of about 50 millivolts (0.050) is needed to maintain stability. If 70 millivolts (0.070) or more is needed for the next stable 100 MHz increase, it means you're attempting to overclock your processor beyond its capability. All processors reach a limit where an additional increase in Core voltage will
not
stabilize another 100 MHz increase in Frequency.
Here's an example of a Core Voltage / Frequency Curve:
With high-end cooling you might reach your Maximum Recommended Vcore limit before you reach the ideal Core temperature limit at
80
°C. With low-end cooling you’ll reach
80
°C before your Vcore limit. Regardless, whichever overclocking limit you reach first is where you should stop.
Remember to keep overclocking in perspective. For example, the difference between 4.5 and 4.6 GHz is less than 2.3%, which has no noticeable impact on overall system performance. It simply isn’t worth pushing your processor beyond recommended Core voltage and Core temperature limits just to squeeze out another 100 MHz.

CPU Overclocking Guide and Tutorial for Beginners
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
Intel Performance Maximizer
For everyone's benefit:
Advanced Vector Extension (AVX) Instruction Sets were introduced with Core i 2nd Generation, then AVX2 with 4th Generation and AVX-512 with later Generations of certain High End Desktop (HEDT) X-Series, Extreme, i9s and i7s
. Each AVX Instruction Set is progressively faster in calculation workloads,
if
you run software that uses AVX codes. Unfortunately, AVX can
adversely affect stability
by
overloading your CPU
, which will
dramatically increase Power consumption and Core temperatures
.
2nd Generation Sandy Bridge processors and 3rd Generation Ivy Bridge processors both have the original AVX Instruction Set, but not the later AVX2 Instruction Set. This is in the Product Specifications website as well as in the Datasheets.
kappsta87
,
Here's the nominal operating range for Core temperature:
Core temperatures above
85
°C are not recommended
.
Core temperatures below
80
°C are ideal
.
For testing thermal performance, run Prime95 Small FFTs, but to conform with Intel's Datasheets, be certain to disable AVX for valid results.
CT

C
CyberThief
Junior Member
26
11-23-2016, 11:00 AM
#8
Great details there—thanks for sharing.
C
CyberThief
11-23-2016, 11:00 AM #8

Great details there—thanks for sharing.

M
116
11-24-2016, 10:54 AM
#9
He's awesome lol.
M
mrwalrusman100
11-24-2016, 10:54 AM #9

He's awesome lol.

A
august1005
Member
61
11-24-2016, 12:11 PM
#10
Yes, 1.275v is the reason we need to proofread, right?
A
august1005
11-24-2016, 12:11 PM #10

Yes, 1.275v is the reason we need to proofread, right?