F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Adjusting 7820x OC using NH-D15S

Adjusting 7820x OC using NH-D15S

Adjusting 7820x OC using NH-D15S

P
Pollochon33
Junior Member
33
01-05-2016, 10:24 AM
#1
I already understand I would achieve better results on water, but I'm hesitant about trying it.
I still aim to extract the maximum performance from this unit using one of the most powerful air coolers available.
Which configuration would provide the greater improvement, though smaller in size?
A) 4.5Ghz with cache set to stock 2.4Ghz
B) 4.0Ghz with cache increased to 3.0-3.2Ghz
I've noticed that cache overclocking typically delivers solid benchmark scores, but it may not translate much to everyday use.
Testing was conducted using Intel XTU.
P
Pollochon33
01-05-2016, 10:24 AM #1

I already understand I would achieve better results on water, but I'm hesitant about trying it.
I still aim to extract the maximum performance from this unit using one of the most powerful air coolers available.
Which configuration would provide the greater improvement, though smaller in size?
A) 4.5Ghz with cache set to stock 2.4Ghz
B) 4.0Ghz with cache increased to 3.0-3.2Ghz
I've noticed that cache overclocking typically delivers solid benchmark scores, but it may not translate much to everyday use.
Testing was conducted using Intel XTU.

G
Gravewalker21
Member
64
01-05-2016, 06:02 PM
#2
Usually, you notice a significantly larger improvement from changing the CPU frequency than adjusting the cache frequency. I’m sure there are a few cases where increasing the cache frequency helps, but those seem to be rare. I’d stick with option A consistently.
G
Gravewalker21
01-05-2016, 06:02 PM #2

Usually, you notice a significantly larger improvement from changing the CPU frequency than adjusting the cache frequency. I’m sure there are a few cases where increasing the cache frequency helps, but those seem to be rare. I’d stick with option A consistently.

M
mcDavoz
Senior Member
544
01-05-2016, 09:22 PM
#3
Usually, you notice a more significant improvement from changing the CPU frequency than the cache frequency. I’m confident that only a few applications benefit from a higher cache speed, but I doubt most will. I’d stick with option A consistently.
M
mcDavoz
01-05-2016, 09:22 PM #3

Usually, you notice a more significant improvement from changing the CPU frequency than the cache frequency. I’m confident that only a few applications benefit from a higher cache speed, but I doubt most will. I’d stick with option A consistently.

F
FlamingTiger9
Member
235
01-06-2016, 01:51 PM
#4
If the benefits from cache speed are minimal, I'll just keep it as is and concentrate on CPU speed. 4.7 (possibly 4.8) should work with my present cooler. Thanks for the advice!
F
FlamingTiger9
01-06-2016, 01:51 PM #4

If the benefits from cache speed are minimal, I'll just keep it as is and concentrate on CPU speed. 4.7 (possibly 4.8) should work with my present cooler. Thanks for the advice!

X
xCattyx
Member
196
01-14-2016, 12:19 PM
#5
Is the chip being overclocked via XTU? If yes, consider adjusting it through the BIOS. Third-party overclocking tools aren't as dependable as the built-in hardware BIOS, even with Intel's XTU.
X
xCattyx
01-14-2016, 12:19 PM #5

Is the chip being overclocked via XTU? If yes, consider adjusting it through the BIOS. Third-party overclocking tools aren't as dependable as the built-in hardware BIOS, even with Intel's XTU.

T
Th3G4merX
Senior Member
700
01-19-2016, 12:18 AM
#6
Are you adjusting the chip via XTU? If yes, I suggest using the BIOS for overclocking. Third-party tools aren't as stable as the built-in hardware BIOS, even with Intel's XTU.
T
Th3G4merX
01-19-2016, 12:18 AM #6

Are you adjusting the chip via XTU? If yes, I suggest using the BIOS for overclocking. Third-party tools aren't as stable as the built-in hardware BIOS, even with Intel's XTU.

L
Lost_Fat_Kid
Junior Member
9
01-19-2016, 01:20 AM
#7
I enjoy XTU and use it on my Intel processors, but it isn't the most intense stress test. If you're checking for stability, you might want to try something different. I don't really support Prime95 a lot because it puts more strain on your system than real-world tasks would. Aida 64 is another solid option that can improve stability.

In any case, if your system runs smoothly in one Cinebench run, it's likely okay. I've only seen a few cases where an overclocked system crashed after completing Cinebench and then crashed again in another program.
L
Lost_Fat_Kid
01-19-2016, 01:20 AM #7

I enjoy XTU and use it on my Intel processors, but it isn't the most intense stress test. If you're checking for stability, you might want to try something different. I don't really support Prime95 a lot because it puts more strain on your system than real-world tasks would. Aida 64 is another solid option that can improve stability.

In any case, if your system runs smoothly in one Cinebench run, it's likely okay. I've only seen a few cases where an overclocked system crashed after completing Cinebench and then crashed again in another program.

J
jd_rv
Junior Member
26
01-19-2016, 06:20 AM
#8
Cinebench, eh? I'll remember that. For Prime95, it's the same reason I avoid it; it's a widely used test, though a bit too much.
J
jd_rv
01-19-2016, 06:20 AM #8

Cinebench, eh? I'll remember that. For Prime95, it's the same reason I avoid it; it's a widely used test, though a bit too much.