F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Adjust the BIOS settings for your AMD 7 2700X and ROG Strix X470-F gaming graphics card.

Adjust the BIOS settings for your AMD 7 2700X and ROG Strix X470-F gaming graphics card.

Adjust the BIOS settings for your AMD 7 2700X and ROG Strix X470-F gaming graphics card.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
R
RobloxKid69
Member
102
01-08-2020, 02:52 AM
#11
I fully support this.
Excellent work, Redneck5439.
Such detailed content will help many people who want to customize a 2700x on an ROG Strix X470-F MB.
R
RobloxKid69
01-08-2020, 02:52 AM #11

I fully support this.
Excellent work, Redneck5439.
Such detailed content will help many people who want to customize a 2700x on an ROG Strix X470-F MB.

J
JesseSSinger
Member
169
01-11-2020, 01:21 AM
#12
I tried to boost my OC but the Prime-x470 4602 BIOS isn't compatible. It lacks the "Performance Enhancer" feature.
J
JesseSSinger
01-11-2020, 01:21 AM #12

I tried to boost my OC but the Prime-x470 4602 BIOS isn't compatible. It lacks the "Performance Enhancer" feature.

F
Fluffycakes123
Senior Member
696
01-11-2020, 08:57 AM
#13
It's crucial to study a BIOS for your MB prior to updating. I'm currently using a version three ahead of the latest one, as it offers the best stability with my CPU and RAM setup.
F
Fluffycakes123
01-11-2020, 08:57 AM #13

It's crucial to study a BIOS for your MB prior to updating. I'm currently using a version three ahead of the latest one, as it offers the best stability with my CPU and RAM setup.

K
Kirman16
Junior Member
3
01-25-2020, 02:59 PM
#14
I exchanged positions multiple times between the Prime X470 and the ROG Strix X470-F until I decided to buy the Strix. The motherboards are quite alike, but the Strix offered superior VRMs—6+2+2 phases—and I think the Prime X470 has a 4+2 phase setup, whereas the Strix’s BIOS is essentially a limited version of the Hero VII’s. At the time, I was planning to upgrade to a Ryzen+ after moving from an FX 8370, so I assumed I wouldn’t need to overclock. The Hero VII seemed too advanced for my needs, but I should have realized my OCD would drive me to push beyond what my 2700X could handle.

I think the Strix board can still perform well with upgrades to a 3700X, 3800X, maybe even the 3900X and beyond, potentially reaching 2020. However, after experimenting with a friend’s setup using a Hero VII, I’d have preferred the Hero VII if I had to start over. The Hero VII’s BIOS enabled us to push his rig to 4.4Ghz all-core on a NH-D15 cooler (with two 140mm fans), and I’m confident his processor could hit 4.5Ghz on a custom loop. Although I might have pushed my CPU further due to thermal limits, the Strix’s BIOS simply didn’t support that level of fine-tuning.
K
Kirman16
01-25-2020, 02:59 PM #14

I exchanged positions multiple times between the Prime X470 and the ROG Strix X470-F until I decided to buy the Strix. The motherboards are quite alike, but the Strix offered superior VRMs—6+2+2 phases—and I think the Prime X470 has a 4+2 phase setup, whereas the Strix’s BIOS is essentially a limited version of the Hero VII’s. At the time, I was planning to upgrade to a Ryzen+ after moving from an FX 8370, so I assumed I wouldn’t need to overclock. The Hero VII seemed too advanced for my needs, but I should have realized my OCD would drive me to push beyond what my 2700X could handle.

I think the Strix board can still perform well with upgrades to a 3700X, 3800X, maybe even the 3900X and beyond, potentially reaching 2020. However, after experimenting with a friend’s setup using a Hero VII, I’d have preferred the Hero VII if I had to start over. The Hero VII’s BIOS enabled us to push his rig to 4.4Ghz all-core on a NH-D15 cooler (with two 140mm fans), and I’m confident his processor could hit 4.5Ghz on a custom loop. Although I might have pushed my CPU further due to thermal limits, the Strix’s BIOS simply didn’t support that level of fine-tuning.

S
Scriflyy
Member
63
01-26-2020, 09:16 AM
#15
I also struggled with choosing between the two options. I selected the Prime because of its more mature look. I just wish they can deliver a top-tier X570 board that doesn’t seem like it was made by a 12-year-old Fortnite gamer.
S
Scriflyy
01-26-2020, 09:16 AM #15

I also struggled with choosing between the two options. I selected the Prime because of its more mature look. I just wish they can deliver a top-tier X570 board that doesn’t seem like it was made by a 12-year-old Fortnite gamer.

S
Schocko1
Junior Member
46
01-27-2020, 06:04 PM
#16
I appreciate the appearance of the asrock taichi boards. Straightforward grey, yet premium parts.
The msi pro carbon boards also seem interesting, though a bit more casual (remember we were all kids at the time 😂)
S
Schocko1
01-27-2020, 06:04 PM #16

I appreciate the appearance of the asrock taichi boards. Straightforward grey, yet premium parts.
The msi pro carbon boards also seem interesting, though a bit more casual (remember we were all kids at the time 😂)

M
MattMan315
Junior Member
7
02-11-2020, 08:17 AM
#17
Thanks for the thorough instructions. I’ve been having a few stressful days at work and plan to review this tonight. I’m trying to determine if the Noctua components will fit without opening the case or using a tape measure. Since the board is identical, it should work fine—just check the height. I own an EVGA DG-77 case; I was initially considering the D15 but think it’s unnecessary even if it fits. The concern about the +offset and V on cores makes me cautious, but I’ll follow your advice. The only other thing is a BIOS update, which I assume is my starting point. I thought about it during setup but saw some FAQs that discouraged it. I’ll wait until there’s a solid reason to proceed. Now I’m deciding.

Keep up the great support!
Mike
M
MattMan315
02-11-2020, 08:17 AM #17

Thanks for the thorough instructions. I’ve been having a few stressful days at work and plan to review this tonight. I’m trying to determine if the Noctua components will fit without opening the case or using a tape measure. Since the board is identical, it should work fine—just check the height. I own an EVGA DG-77 case; I was initially considering the D15 but think it’s unnecessary even if it fits. The concern about the +offset and V on cores makes me cautious, but I’ll follow your advice. The only other thing is a BIOS update, which I assume is my starting point. I thought about it during setup but saw some FAQs that discouraged it. I’ll wait until there’s a solid reason to proceed. Now I’m deciding.

Keep up the great support!
Mike

L
LegacyUnited
Junior Member
5
02-11-2020, 04:54 PM
#18
Chipset and bios updated.
Current settings restored to previous ones.
CB20(4029) HWMonitor data available at the provided link.
I’m planning to proceed... setting at PE level 2, skipping +offset unless I encounter boot issues or other problems.
Hope it works... still need to order a cooler. It seems it should fit, as the Prism is 6.3 inches and the 14S is 6.5, leaving about 3 or more inches of space above the prism in my case.
L
LegacyUnited
02-11-2020, 04:54 PM #18

Chipset and bios updated.
Current settings restored to previous ones.
CB20(4029) HWMonitor data available at the provided link.
I’m planning to proceed... setting at PE level 2, skipping +offset unless I encounter boot issues or other problems.
Hope it works... still need to order a cooler. It seems it should fit, as the Prism is 6.3 inches and the 14S is 6.5, leaving about 3 or more inches of space above the prism in my case.

K
KawiianMili
Posting Freak
786
02-12-2020, 10:38 PM
#19
I followed all the configurations (without adding an offset, just letting it be but Max V seen in HWM is 1.531V that's safe??). I ran CB20 (3919) but only reached 83°C instead of 85°C... I'll download one of the programs to test stability and report back. Cheers.
K
KawiianMili
02-12-2020, 10:38 PM #19

I followed all the configurations (without adding an offset, just letting it be but Max V seen in HWM is 1.531V that's safe??). I ran CB20 (3919) but only reached 83°C instead of 85°C... I'll download one of the programs to test stability and report back. Cheers.

A
AzmiCraft
Member
177
02-28-2020, 12:38 PM
#20
I've experienced success with the NH-U14S, but be sure to contact Nocuta right after placing your order and obtain the AM4 mounting kit. Only mounts compatible with Intel and AM3 sockets are included in this model. I previously used the NH-D15S on an older build (AM3+ FX 8370), but during cleaning I discovered the cooler had cracked my board (Asus Sabertooth). Although it might have been a coincidence, the cooler was heavier than the 14S, so I chose the safer option of selecting the 14S.

I've completed full rendering projects with all cores at 4.35Ghz and haven't encountered temperatures above 74°C yet. At my standard 4.25Ghz during daily content creation, temperatures never surpassed 70°C, and gaming sessions stayed under 55°C. This cooler performs exceptionally well, particularly when paired with two 140mm fans in a push-pull configuration.

At level 2, you might not need a voltage offset, as I'm unsure when I first started adding extra voltage. Running PE level 4 initially required increasing the voltage to 0.05000, which initially seemed risky but provided stability and kept voltages within safe limits. Before upgrading to the 14S, I managed to use PE level 3 with a positive voltage offset of 0.03000 on the original Prism cooler. However, during that time it was winter outside, possibly offering a helpful breeze for cooling, and as always, I'm quite sensitive to temperature control—hence my reliance on six 140mm case fans.

Over the years, I've learned that maintaining a reliable cooler extends component lifespan and enhances performance.
A
AzmiCraft
02-28-2020, 12:38 PM #20

I've experienced success with the NH-U14S, but be sure to contact Nocuta right after placing your order and obtain the AM4 mounting kit. Only mounts compatible with Intel and AM3 sockets are included in this model. I previously used the NH-D15S on an older build (AM3+ FX 8370), but during cleaning I discovered the cooler had cracked my board (Asus Sabertooth). Although it might have been a coincidence, the cooler was heavier than the 14S, so I chose the safer option of selecting the 14S.

I've completed full rendering projects with all cores at 4.35Ghz and haven't encountered temperatures above 74°C yet. At my standard 4.25Ghz during daily content creation, temperatures never surpassed 70°C, and gaming sessions stayed under 55°C. This cooler performs exceptionally well, particularly when paired with two 140mm fans in a push-pull configuration.

At level 2, you might not need a voltage offset, as I'm unsure when I first started adding extra voltage. Running PE level 4 initially required increasing the voltage to 0.05000, which initially seemed risky but provided stability and kept voltages within safe limits. Before upgrading to the 14S, I managed to use PE level 3 with a positive voltage offset of 0.03000 on the original Prism cooler. However, during that time it was winter outside, possibly offering a helpful breeze for cooling, and as always, I'm quite sensitive to temperature control—hence my reliance on six 140mm case fans.

Over the years, I've learned that maintaining a reliable cooler extends component lifespan and enhances performance.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next