adjust fx8320 speed from 3.5ghz to 4ghz
adjust fx8320 speed from 3.5ghz to 4ghz
Elbert suggested waiting before running prime95 for an hour, unless you're trying to fix the thermal paste. Just about three minutes of prime95 will make sure 99.9% of games run smoothly. Since no game uses nearly all cores, 55°C is fine. Keep it under 55°C for three minutes. You might need to lower your NB voltage if you want higher temps. What's your heatsink? Do you think the CPU temperature stayed around 55°C? The minimum was 9°C according to Coretemp, and the temp didn't change by more than 1°C during the test. It's not about the highest temperature but about thermal throttling. Running it higher is unnecessary and wastes overclocking time. I believe HwMonitor is mistaken. Speedfan also confirmed this, but it mentioned his motherboard or another part was at -128°C, which Coretemp is also unsure about. AMD overdrive seems to be the right approach.
Elbert suggested waiting before running Prime95 for an hour, unless you're trying to fix the thermal paste. About three minutes is enough to make sure 99.9% of games run smoothly. Since no game uses nearly all cores, 55°C isn't too bad. Keep it under 55°C for three minutes. You might need to lower your NB voltage if you want higher temps. Do you know the heatsink temperature? Are the minimum and maximum CPU temps really 55°C? The test showed a drop from 9°C, not a big fluctuation. It's more about thermal throttling than max temp. I think HWMonitor might be wrong. Speedfan also confirmed this, but it mentioned the motherboard or another part was at -128°C. AMD overdrive seems to be the better option.
Richie1115: First, avoid running prime95 for an hour unless you're attempting to fix the thermal paste. Just about three minutes of prime95 will guarantee stable performance for 99.9% of your games. Since no game uses nearly all cores, a 55°C is acceptable. Keep it under 55°C for three minutes. You might need to lower your NB voltage if you want to go higher. Do you know the heatsink temperature? Are the minimum and maximum temperatures listed as 55°C? Did the temperature stay within 1°C during the test? Coretemp reports a minimum of 9°C, but that's not about the actual max—it's about thermal throttling. It's better to rely on AMD overdrive than to risk overheating. I'm wondering if HwMonitor is correct. Speedfan confirmed the same, but it also mentioned his motherboard or another component was at -128°C, and Coretemp is uncertain. I think it's best to use AMD overdrive. Should I run a test with prime95 for 5-10 minutes? That seems reasonable. Elbert's advice is valid too. His tests showed the CPU lasted under 15 minutes sometimes, but thermal margins mean it might take time to get used to overclocking. For more info, check:
The recommended approach is to avoid running Prime95 for an hour unless you're attempting to fix a thermal paste issue. Just about three minutes of Prime95 should be sufficient to ensure stable performance across 99.9% of games, as no game will use nearly all cores. Keeping the temperature below 55°C for three minutes is ideal; you might need to lower your NB voltage if you want to raise it further. Could you tell me what your heatsink is made of? Regarding the CPU temperatures, I was wondering if the minimum and maximum values were indeed 55°C, and whether the temperature stayed within a single degree during the test. Coretemp mentioned a minimum of 9°C—was that accurate? It seems more about thermal throttling than peak temperature. AMD overdrive might be the better option. Should I run Prime95 for 5 to 10 minutes, or is Elbert's advice just as reliable? His test showed it lasted up to 15 minutes, though sometimes it fluctuated. This could be due to thermal margins requiring some adjustment to Overdrive settings. For more details, you can check:
What kind of cooler are you using? The WeberDarren97 mentioned the CoolerMaster Hyper 212evo.
You might use a 120mm fan with a push-pull setup on the CM212 to assist in lowering temperatures.
Richie1115 :
which cooler are you running?
CoolerMaster Hyper 212evo
you'd get significantly improved cooling with the BeQuiet! Dark Rock 3. It's only a bit taller than the 212 EVO, so it should fit perfectly in your case.
I kept my setting as it was and now I notice something odd. When the CPU is idle or not loading much, the clock speed fluctuates between 1600 mhz and 4300 mhz. This is my first time overclocking, so I’m unsure if it’s normal or not (I haven’t changed the voltage, so everything is on stock voltage with auto settings).
I kept my setup like that and now I notice something odd. When the CPU is idle or not heavily loading, the clock speed fluctuates between 1600 mhz and 4300 mhz. This is my first experience with overclocking, so I’m unsure if it’s normal or not (I didn’t adjust the voltage, so everything is on stock settings). Here’s the image.
Everything seems fine. Intel has EIST, speedstep, and other features that let the CPU "slow down" when there’s little activity. Windows also contributes to this behavior.
The user can configure minimum and maximum processor states (read speed) if those features are available with the CPU. AMD offers similar options too. Even if the performance plan is set to High performance, advanced settings can still be adjusted. There’s no point in forcing a car to run at 7000 RPMs when it’s only going 15 mph—CPUs behave the same way. Same goes for CPUs: there’s no need to waste energy unnecessarily.