F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming A World of Warcraft mount is available for $90 or £60.

A World of Warcraft mount is available for $90 or £60.

A World of Warcraft mount is available for $90 or £60.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
S
StormGaming
Junior Member
21
04-26-2023, 03:36 PM
#11
WoW seems similar to FFXIV in offering physical collector editions with exclusive merchandise, usually not found elsewhere. If you're interested, it makes sense. FFXIV also provides large figures of bosses within the game, each paired with an emote allowing your character to perform a move—just cosmetic. This has been a long-standing joke about receiving an expensive emote with a free figure.
S
StormGaming
04-26-2023, 03:36 PM #11

WoW seems similar to FFXIV in offering physical collector editions with exclusive merchandise, usually not found elsewhere. If you're interested, it makes sense. FFXIV also provides large figures of bosses within the game, each paired with an emote allowing your character to perform a move—just cosmetic. This has been a long-standing joke about receiving an expensive emote with a free figure.

G
152
04-26-2023, 05:12 PM
#12
Undoubtedly. I’m indifferent about excessive power-ups or overpriced cosmetics; what matters is transparency and value. Still, I don’t distinguish between loot boxes and gambling outright. The same rules and oversight should be in place. Issues become unclear with tactics like FOMO or time-limited events. It’s tough to define a clear boundary, but this is where regulators and experts should step in for careful review. Manipulative sales strategies, psychological manipulation, and framing purchases as gambling (“it’s not loot boxes, it’s surprise mechanics”) are far more troubling than any violence or explicit content in games.
G
GlennTheMaster
04-26-2023, 05:12 PM #12

Undoubtedly. I’m indifferent about excessive power-ups or overpriced cosmetics; what matters is transparency and value. Still, I don’t distinguish between loot boxes and gambling outright. The same rules and oversight should be in place. Issues become unclear with tactics like FOMO or time-limited events. It’s tough to define a clear boundary, but this is where regulators and experts should step in for careful review. Manipulative sales strategies, psychological manipulation, and framing purchases as gambling (“it’s not loot boxes, it’s surprise mechanics”) are far more troubling than any violence or explicit content in games.

M
MiniAlex7892
Junior Member
14
04-27-2023, 11:33 AM
#13
Each year these businesses experiment with what consumers are willing to spend on. When prices rise, it shows demand remains. If everyone decides together it's too costly and stops buying, prices should fall. It's straightforward. The existence of microtransactions and cosmetic purchases works because they generate revenue. I share this responsibility. I once spent a lot on these features, but around five years ago I recognized my role in the issue and stopped purchasing them. If you buy these items, you're directly contributing to the problem. Playing the game without buying such extras still counts as part of the issue. When a game has a substantial player base, big companies have more motivation to keep investing. Without players, there are no major investors. Only when people completely stop engaging in these practices and also support games that avoid them will consumers truly influence developers. We must demonstrate to creators that quality games can be profitable without relying on excessive spending. That way, they’ll prioritize crafting engaging experiences over extracting every penny. Yet here we are. To mark two decades of this title, you get the chance to purchase a mount. In fact, players over a certain age should receive it as a token of appreciation for their long-term subscription.
M
MiniAlex7892
04-27-2023, 11:33 AM #13

Each year these businesses experiment with what consumers are willing to spend on. When prices rise, it shows demand remains. If everyone decides together it's too costly and stops buying, prices should fall. It's straightforward. The existence of microtransactions and cosmetic purchases works because they generate revenue. I share this responsibility. I once spent a lot on these features, but around five years ago I recognized my role in the issue and stopped purchasing them. If you buy these items, you're directly contributing to the problem. Playing the game without buying such extras still counts as part of the issue. When a game has a substantial player base, big companies have more motivation to keep investing. Without players, there are no major investors. Only when people completely stop engaging in these practices and also support games that avoid them will consumers truly influence developers. We must demonstrate to creators that quality games can be profitable without relying on excessive spending. That way, they’ll prioritize crafting engaging experiences over extracting every penny. Yet here we are. To mark two decades of this title, you get the chance to purchase a mount. In fact, players over a certain age should receive it as a token of appreciation for their long-term subscription.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2