F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming A modern game rig should have at least 16GB of RAM for smooth performance.

A modern game rig should have at least 16GB of RAM for smooth performance.

A modern game rig should have at least 16GB of RAM for smooth performance.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
A
AA_Esser
Member
181
05-04-2016, 08:48 PM
#1
I developed my setup in 2013 when 16 GB was more than enough for gaming. Over nearly a decade, upgrades have changed the landscape—now many people use 32 GB as the norm. Considering current trends, 16 GB still works but might feel limited. 32 GB could offer better performance and future-proofing.
A
AA_Esser
05-04-2016, 08:48 PM #1

I developed my setup in 2013 when 16 GB was more than enough for gaming. Over nearly a decade, upgrades have changed the landscape—now many people use 32 GB as the norm. Considering current trends, 16 GB still works but might feel limited. 32 GB could offer better performance and future-proofing.

T
70
05-14-2016, 10:52 AM
#2
16GB works well for most needs, but opting for 32GB is a better choice if you have the budget.
T
ToxicDragon134
05-14-2016, 10:52 AM #2

16GB works well for most needs, but opting for 32GB is a better choice if you have the budget.

U
UglyMuffinz
Member
167
05-14-2016, 12:29 PM
#3
This discussion has been repeated many times before. People often claim 16GB suffices, especially those using low to mid-range systems at 1080p. Others argue that high-end users needing 1440p or higher require at least 32GB. I personally use games that demand around 20GB of RAM and feel confident that 32GB is the ideal amount for modern high-performance machines.
U
UglyMuffinz
05-14-2016, 12:29 PM #3

This discussion has been repeated many times before. People often claim 16GB suffices, especially those using low to mid-range systems at 1080p. Others argue that high-end users needing 1440p or higher require at least 32GB. I personally use games that demand around 20GB of RAM and feel confident that 32GB is the ideal amount for modern high-performance machines.

R
Realm_Master17
Junior Member
1
05-21-2016, 03:12 AM
#4
For most games, 16GB suffices. It reaches the maximum practical amount, though it still works well if you don’t have a lot of background tasks or multiple Chrome tabs open (which is why I’m choosing 32GB). The situation isn’t straightforward. If staying within your budget makes sense, going down to 16GB could let you upgrade components like the GPU, CPU, or storage for better performance. You can always switch to 32GB a few years later if needed. Adding more RAM wouldn’t hurt and would give you more flexibility in managing memory. (This applies only to DDR4 systems; DDR5 chips perform worse with 8GB compared to 16GB due to narrower buses.)
R
Realm_Master17
05-21-2016, 03:12 AM #4

For most games, 16GB suffices. It reaches the maximum practical amount, though it still works well if you don’t have a lot of background tasks or multiple Chrome tabs open (which is why I’m choosing 32GB). The situation isn’t straightforward. If staying within your budget makes sense, going down to 16GB could let you upgrade components like the GPU, CPU, or storage for better performance. You can always switch to 32GB a few years later if needed. Adding more RAM wouldn’t hurt and would give you more flexibility in managing memory. (This applies only to DDR4 systems; DDR5 chips perform worse with 8GB compared to 16GB due to narrower buses.)

A
Aragone
Member
224
05-22-2016, 05:35 AM
#5
16GB is enough, and with a 2013 rig you certainly use DDR3, it's not worth buying some more now that even DDR4 is becoming obsolete soon
A
Aragone
05-22-2016, 05:35 AM #5

16GB is enough, and with a 2013 rig you certainly use DDR3, it's not worth buying some more now that even DDR4 is becoming obsolete soon

_
75
05-24-2016, 03:04 AM
#6
Billy G mentioned 640k, I agree... That's what I'll use.
_
_victorplayer_
05-24-2016, 03:04 AM #6

Billy G mentioned 640k, I agree... That's what I'll use.

D
Deneth_
Member
175
05-24-2016, 06:14 AM
#7
I understand your perspective. 16gb works well when you're not juggling many background processes. For heavier workloads, 32gb tends to be more reliable. If you're planning an upgrade, there are some great offers on eBay. A 32gb option usually costs between $50 and $100 without the extra features. DDR3 is nearing its end of production, having been available for about 8 years since its release, while DDR4 has been around for roughly 15 years.
D
Deneth_
05-24-2016, 06:14 AM #7

I understand your perspective. 16gb works well when you're not juggling many background processes. For heavier workloads, 32gb tends to be more reliable. If you're planning an upgrade, there are some great offers on eBay. A 32gb option usually costs between $50 and $100 without the extra features. DDR3 is nearing its end of production, having been available for about 8 years since its release, while DDR4 has been around for roughly 15 years.

G
Guson
Junior Member
46
05-24-2016, 09:49 AM
#8
DDR4 is set to become outdated quickly because most systems continue to rely on it. While newer tech emerges, a significant number of users—including myself—keep supporting DDR3 setups. It will remain useful for a few more years.
G
Guson
05-24-2016, 09:49 AM #8

DDR4 is set to become outdated quickly because most systems continue to rely on it. While newer tech emerges, a significant number of users—including myself—keep supporting DDR3 setups. It will remain useful for a few more years.

M
Math5612
Junior Member
3
05-26-2016, 04:39 AM
#9
In a year or so I believe the situation will be such that no one will still use DDR4 since all new CPUs will switch to DDR5. Still, the main point remains upgrading a nine-year-old system by adding two more RAM modules isn't really worth it, because most of it will need updates soon—possibly even now.
M
Math5612
05-26-2016, 04:39 AM #9

In a year or so I believe the situation will be such that no one will still use DDR4 since all new CPUs will switch to DDR5. Still, the main point remains upgrading a nine-year-old system by adding two more RAM modules isn't really worth it, because most of it will need updates soon—possibly even now.

C
cosmicic
Junior Member
35
05-26-2016, 10:08 AM
#10
I've also pondered this a bit. My old 1700 rig and my new 5900X both have 32GB, though. Sometimes I question whether upgrading to 64GB would have helped, but it seems the main problems are more about the GPU (RTX3060ti) than anything else.
C
cosmicic
05-26-2016, 10:08 AM #10

I've also pondered this a bit. My old 1700 rig and my new 5900X both have 32GB, though. Sometimes I question whether upgrading to 64GB would have helped, but it seems the main problems are more about the GPU (RTX3060ti) than anything else.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next