F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming A comparison between Witcher 3 and Crysis 3.

A comparison between Witcher 3 and Crysis 3.

A comparison between Witcher 3 and Crysis 3.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
L
Laminate_
Member
55
04-14-2016, 07:07 PM
#11
Looking at the thread on Neogaf's forum, it discusses a specific issue or conversation from that page.
L
Laminate_
04-14-2016, 07:07 PM #11

Looking at the thread on Neogaf's forum, it discusses a specific issue or conversation from that page.

P
Pixel_Pixie_
Junior Member
17
04-14-2016, 09:04 PM
#12
Crysis 1 runs extremely demanding on the processor, barely utilizing multiple cores. It assigns full processing power to one core while using only half to half the capacity on the other.
P
Pixel_Pixie_
04-14-2016, 09:04 PM #12

Crysis 1 runs extremely demanding on the processor, barely utilizing multiple cores. It assigns full processing power to one core while using only half to half the capacity on the other.

J
JaMaBoys
Junior Member
1
04-14-2016, 09:53 PM
#13
It was tough to hit 60 fps in Crysis 1 with those specs—especially on a GTX 970 and a 4.4 GHz Pentium G3258 running at full settings. The performance was limited mainly by the CPU, not the graphics. It’s surprising how outdated the game felt despite its age.
J
JaMaBoys
04-14-2016, 09:53 PM #13

It was tough to hit 60 fps in Crysis 1 with those specs—especially on a GTX 970 and a 4.4 GHz Pentium G3258 running at full settings. The performance was limited mainly by the CPU, not the graphics. It’s surprising how outdated the game felt despite its age.

C
Citareus
Junior Member
2
04-14-2016, 10:36 PM
#14
Crysis 3 handles parallel tasks efficiently. It achieves strong performance across all eight Xeon cores. The wind visuals in the early game are impressive.
C
Citareus
04-14-2016, 10:36 PM #14

Crysis 3 handles parallel tasks efficiently. It achieves strong performance across all eight Xeon cores. The wind visuals in the early game are impressive.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2