9900KS or?
9900KS or?
The main opinion is that the 9900Ks are still a good choice. Upgrading to an Intel 10nm desktop feels like a big jump, but it’s worth considering if you’re ready for the change.
It's a better version of the 9900K. That's roughly all there is to it.
The 5820K isn't too poor. What upgrades are necessary for improvement?
Yep Gaming handles a bit of streaming and some graphics work. I like going overboard sometimes, so I’d set up a custom loop and merge it in.
Tired of the long startup times on x99 when I'm working on my tasks
I used the 5820k for a while before moving up to better components—switching to motherboards and CPUs, from an Asus x99 Sabertooth to a 6900k on the Rampage V Edition 10. The x99 still works fine, but I understand your point about wanting improvements. Right now, I’m being called an Intel enthusiast since my builds have always used Intel parts, starting with a Celeron 566 in 2000. If you’re more practical, the Ryzen 9 3950x looks strong, especially for non-gaming tasks. Its 16 cores/32 threads make it a solid choice for multitasking or general use. The 9900ks still edge out them at gaming performance, though they’re pricier. I’m planning a new gaming-focused rig, so I’ll likely stick with the Ryzen 9 3950x if you need top-tier gaming speed and want better value elsewhere. For anything else, the 9900ks remain a solid option. TLDR—opt for Ryzen 9 3950x when you need overall performance, or keep the 9900ks if you’re mainly into games.
The 3950x completely dismissed every Intel deal, making it seem like AMD was the only option until I noticed the numbers on it. My focus stayed on the 9900k since it stood out more. The way Intel grouped the 9900ks felt sloppy compared to AMD’s handling of the 3950x.
An i9 9900k would suit your 2080 Ti better at 1440p or lower. Swapping a 5GHz i7 8086k would be the right choice. It’s surprising how well the 2080 Ti supports 5GHz CPUs, especially when next-gen GPUs arrive.