F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking 9900K 5.4 ghz question

9900K 5.4 ghz question

9900K 5.4 ghz question

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
R
Rubicube59
Member
192
11-27-2018, 04:31 PM
#1
I managed to stabilize my 9900k at a consistent 5.3 GHZ @ 86 C using RealBench with an Auros Master, suggesting there’s still some flexibility for 5.4 GHZ. I can handle daily activities and gaming smoothly at that frequency. My configuration settings are:

CPU v.core 1.430
vcore calibration @ UltraExtreme (last in the hierarchy)
hyperthreading off
CPU internal ac/dc load line to Performance
Enhanced Multi-Core Performance On

I tested both InterBurn and RealBench at 5.4, but experienced freezing with my mouse cursor for 7–10 seconds before a blue screen appeared. I’ve increased the voltage several times, yet the screen still freezes. What additional factor might be affecting stability?
R
Rubicube59
11-27-2018, 04:31 PM #1

I managed to stabilize my 9900k at a consistent 5.3 GHZ @ 86 C using RealBench with an Auros Master, suggesting there’s still some flexibility for 5.4 GHZ. I can handle daily activities and gaming smoothly at that frequency. My configuration settings are:

CPU v.core 1.430
vcore calibration @ UltraExtreme (last in the hierarchy)
hyperthreading off
CPU internal ac/dc load line to Performance
Enhanced Multi-Core Performance On

I tested both InterBurn and RealBench at 5.4, but experienced freezing with my mouse cursor for 7–10 seconds before a blue screen appeared. I’ve increased the voltage several times, yet the screen still freezes. What additional factor might be affecting stability?

P
Pickmaster12
Senior Member
710
11-27-2018, 05:37 PM
#2
Hmm, it seems the silicon isn't working properly. This could be a real constraint.
P
Pickmaster12
11-27-2018, 05:37 PM #2

Hmm, it seems the silicon isn't working properly. This could be a real constraint.

T
Tyazoyd
Member
71
12-04-2018, 06:33 AM
#3
I've seen the opposite there before. What do you think about all of them then?
T
Tyazoyd
12-04-2018, 06:33 AM #3

I've seen the opposite there before. What do you think about all of them then?

B
BlackAce456
Junior Member
3
12-11-2018, 09:35 AM
#4
What can you comment on about them?
🤣
They claim all 9900Ks can reach X frequency without changing settings, suggesting a fixed 'golden' configuration for each 9900K to achieve 5.4ghz.
In reality, this is only partially true. You might need improved cooling for the motherboard's VRMs or the processor die if you're not using direct die cooling, otherwise you risk damage.
The performance differences are real—User A can go up to 5.2ghz, User B up to 5.4ghz, User C down to 4.9ghz, and so on.
Silicon lottery is at play here.
B
BlackAce456
12-11-2018, 09:35 AM #4

What can you comment on about them?
🤣
They claim all 9900Ks can reach X frequency without changing settings, suggesting a fixed 'golden' configuration for each 9900K to achieve 5.4ghz.
In reality, this is only partially true. You might need improved cooling for the motherboard's VRMs or the processor die if you're not using direct die cooling, otherwise you risk damage.
The performance differences are real—User A can go up to 5.2ghz, User B up to 5.4ghz, User C down to 4.9ghz, and so on.
Silicon lottery is at play here.

A
103
12-11-2018, 11:50 AM
#5
Find links to sources confirming 5.4ghz compatibility across all chips.
A
Autobotforever
12-11-2018, 11:50 AM #5

Find links to sources confirming 5.4ghz compatibility across all chips.

M
meandmoreme
Member
188
12-13-2018, 06:24 AM
#6
I could connect to a direct forum, though I doubt the moderators would approve. I'm glad I might have a lucky chip. I interpreted his meaning as the 9900k being unable to succeed.
M
meandmoreme
12-13-2018, 06:24 AM #6

I could connect to a direct forum, though I doubt the moderators would approve. I'm glad I might have a lucky chip. I interpreted his meaning as the 9900k being unable to succeed.

S
SuperTurtle998
Junior Member
28
01-01-2019, 10:02 AM
#7
If not a direct link, then the name of the forum, and forum thread at least?
S
SuperTurtle998
01-01-2019, 10:02 AM #7

If not a direct link, then the name of the forum, and forum thread at least?

E
Erik22102006
Member
62
01-01-2019, 06:36 PM
#8
I answered your query beforehand. I believed he intended that 9900k wouldn't be able to achieve 5.4 GHZ.
E
Erik22102006
01-01-2019, 06:36 PM #8

I answered your query beforehand. I believed he intended that 9900k wouldn't be able to achieve 5.4 GHZ.

N
ninjakitty2
Member
132
01-01-2019, 11:15 PM
#9
I thought you were driving fast247 for a moment. It's a good chip.
N
ninjakitty2
01-01-2019, 11:15 PM #9

I thought you were driving fast247 for a moment. It's a good chip.

R
ryan2003usa
Junior Member
1
01-01-2019, 11:49 PM
#10
Oh! My mistake then.
R
ryan2003usa
01-01-2019, 11:49 PM #10

Oh! My mistake then.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next