F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking 980 Ti overclock - What's the limit for a 65.5% ASIC?

980 Ti overclock - What's the limit for a 65.5% ASIC?

980 Ti overclock - What's the limit for a 65.5% ASIC?

B
BlueBackChart
Member
84
12-31-2016, 04:03 AM
#1
I tried to exceed the original specifications by increasing the base and memory overclocks by 200 MHz. After doing this, the Nvidia driver stopped working and later recovered. The event ID was 4101. I kept letting the computer fold without further crashes, but I'm unsure if one crash was directly linked to the overclock increase. I haven't played any games since then.
B
BlueBackChart
12-31-2016, 04:03 AM #1

I tried to exceed the original specifications by increasing the base and memory overclocks by 200 MHz. After doing this, the Nvidia driver stopped working and later recovered. The event ID was 4101. I kept letting the computer fold without further crashes, but I'm unsure if one crash was directly linked to the overclock increase. I haven't played any games since then.

D
DatBoii
Member
144
01-02-2017, 03:02 AM
#2
It seems like the current setup is primarily driven by GPU performance. The base clock isn't as crucial as the boost clock, which Precision X will display when GPUs operate under specific conditions. At 1406, your maximum boost clock is reached with the overclocking (OC) applied.

For best results, begin by tuning your core clock first and achieving a consistent OC before addressing memory. This approach prevents overloading both components, ensuring stability. Monitor temperatures closely, as GPUs tend to throttle slightly with rising heat. Adjust core clocks gradually in steps of +20-25Mhz until you reach optimal performance.
D
DatBoii
01-02-2017, 03:02 AM #2

It seems like the current setup is primarily driven by GPU performance. The base clock isn't as crucial as the boost clock, which Precision X will display when GPUs operate under specific conditions. At 1406, your maximum boost clock is reached with the overclocking (OC) applied.

For best results, begin by tuning your core clock first and achieving a consistent OC before addressing memory. This approach prevents overloading both components, ensuring stability. Monitor temperatures closely, as GPUs tend to throttle slightly with rising heat. Adjust core clocks gradually in steps of +20-25Mhz until you reach optimal performance.

F
floundershy
Member
191
01-02-2017, 07:13 AM
#3
Also, based on GPU-Z:
GPU Core Clock: 1253 MHz
GPU Memory Clock: 1652.4 MHz
Let me know if you need more details.
F
floundershy
01-02-2017, 07:13 AM #3

Also, based on GPU-Z:
GPU Core Clock: 1253 MHz
GPU Memory Clock: 1652.4 MHz
Let me know if you need more details.

S
Shukokai
Member
231
01-02-2017, 08:56 AM
#4
I increased the core by +200 right away... that's a lot, right? If it's already at 1253, pushing it over 1550mhz is possible. On my 970 I'm getting around 1554mhz, which is the maximum and at 74% ASIC performance. I think it's best to increase in steps of about 50mhz. I believe you could reach around 1500mhz. For memory, I can handle an extra +500 without issues, but overclocking memory doesn't help much. And yes, if it crashes even once, it's likely to happen again, especially during games.
S
Shukokai
01-02-2017, 08:56 AM #4

I increased the core by +200 right away... that's a lot, right? If it's already at 1253, pushing it over 1550mhz is possible. On my 970 I'm getting around 1554mhz, which is the maximum and at 74% ASIC performance. I think it's best to increase in steps of about 50mhz. I believe you could reach around 1500mhz. For memory, I can handle an extra +500 without issues, but overclocking memory doesn't help much. And yes, if it crashes even once, it's likely to happen again, especially during games.

O
OwnageHosting
Member
60
01-02-2017, 10:21 AM
#5
You need to monitor overclocking closely on the CPU and GPU for folding. Occasionally it might lead to your work units being rejected due to excessive errors.
O
OwnageHosting
01-02-2017, 10:21 AM #5

You need to monitor overclocking closely on the CPU and GPU for folding. Occasionally it might lead to your work units being rejected due to excessive errors.

J
joshmcm10
Junior Member
49
01-02-2017, 11:30 AM
#6
The original post mentions specific clock speeds and overclocking considerations. To achieve a stable overclock with the goal of folding, one could explore advanced BIOS settings and power management techniques.
J
joshmcm10
01-02-2017, 11:30 AM #6

The original post mentions specific clock speeds and overclocking considerations. To achieve a stable overclock with the goal of folding, one could explore advanced BIOS settings and power management techniques.

N
nickiseenminer
Junior Member
38
01-02-2017, 04:28 PM
#7
the core is 1253 after overclocking? that's not that high, you likely increased the memory clock too much.
N
nickiseenminer
01-02-2017, 04:28 PM #7

the core is 1253 after overclocking? that's not that high, you likely increased the memory clock too much.

I
IlllllIll
Junior Member
20
01-09-2017, 02:12 PM
#8
You slowly increase your overclocks while monitoring for any issues with the work units. I experienced WU errors on an old i7 920 folding rig when pushed to the highest MHz.
I
IlllllIll
01-09-2017, 02:12 PM #8

You slowly increase your overclocks while monitoring for any issues with the work units. I experienced WU errors on an old i7 920 folding rig when pushed to the highest MHz.

R
RoseJr
Member
244
01-09-2017, 07:54 PM
#9
I increased the core and memory clock speeds by +150 MHz. The Precision X reported GPU clocks at 1406 Mhz, then decreased to 1392 and finally 1372. Is this typical behavior or does it suggest thermal throttling or instability? The GPU temperature target is set to the default of 83°C.
R
RoseJr
01-09-2017, 07:54 PM #9

I increased the core and memory clock speeds by +150 MHz. The Precision X reported GPU clocks at 1406 Mhz, then decreased to 1392 and finally 1372. Is this typical behavior or does it suggest thermal throttling or instability? The GPU temperature target is set to the default of 83°C.

D
Duilder28
Junior Member
24
01-10-2017, 06:01 PM
#10
It seems like you're just noticing the usual performance boost from your GPU. The base clock isn't as crucial as the boost clock, which is what Precision X will report when your GPUs are operating under certain conditions. At 1406, you reach the peak boost clock with your overclocking settings.

Here are some tips: begin by tuning your core clock first and achieving a consistent overclock before moving on to memory. This approach prevents you from compromising stability by adjusting both at once. Once you have a stable core, you can proceed with memory tuning. Keep an eye on temperatures since GPUs tend to throttle slightly as temperatures rise. You should increase your core clocks in small steps of +20-25Mhz until you find the optimal balance. For memory, you can raise it in +50Mhz increments and see what the maximum performance is.

My original kingpins were set at 1443Mhz core/7092Mhz memory, while with my current overclock I'm running 1500Mhz core/8000Memory.
D
Duilder28
01-10-2017, 06:01 PM #10

It seems like you're just noticing the usual performance boost from your GPU. The base clock isn't as crucial as the boost clock, which is what Precision X will report when your GPUs are operating under certain conditions. At 1406, you reach the peak boost clock with your overclocking settings.

Here are some tips: begin by tuning your core clock first and achieving a consistent overclock before moving on to memory. This approach prevents you from compromising stability by adjusting both at once. Once you have a stable core, you can proceed with memory tuning. Keep an eye on temperatures since GPUs tend to throttle slightly as temperatures rise. You should increase your core clocks in small steps of +20-25Mhz until you find the optimal balance. For memory, you can raise it in +50Mhz increments and see what the maximum performance is.

My original kingpins were set at 1443Mhz core/7092Mhz memory, while with my current overclock I'm running 1500Mhz core/8000Memory.